In 1969 Apollo 12 placed a seismograph on the lunar surface then crashed a probe into it. The moon 'rang like a bell' for several hours. NASA is hard pressed to explain natural occuring hollow space objects. The number of lunar anomalies and coincidences are too numerous to list. Christopher Knight wrote a book called Who Built The Moon. While his final conclusions are a bit too much to accept, the info is incredible. You'll never look at the moon the same again.
The moon can't be hollow There can and must be another explanation as to why the siesmograpg recorded like that. Look at the moon. Its riddled with impact craters. No way its hollow. It would have collapsed. Perhaps its more like earth, but since its dead, there are empty lava tubes and cave complexes running through it. It has no molten core possibly. -yuri
The earth rings too. After the 2004 earthquake that caused the huge tsunami, graphs around the world reported resonance for a couple days.
Actually I just had a thought. A hollow object filled with liquid would ring in a similar way to.a hollow object filled with air. Furethermore the cave riddle crust surrounding the liquid interior should ressonate like a hollow ball. Perhaps the moon does in fact hava a molten core like earth. Just smaller. -yuri
It's pretty much established fact that the moon has a partially molten core. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_structure_of_the_Moon
food for thought - The moon has no atmosphere and therefore no buffer to wick away sound as thermal energy.
Haha op i think i saw the same show you saw that you heard this, maybe? I forgot what their conclusion was, i think it was its dry composition and hollowness from empty lava plumes. Lol like i said i dont remember
Forgive my pride, but I am fairly certain that I am correct. If the moon does in fact have an atmosphere, of what gases is it composed?
Yes it does, and a bit of water says nasa. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LADEE/news/lunar-atmosphere.html#.VXCGH1JHac0
Here is a link. By the way, when I said that "other than the fact that the moon has an atmosphere, you are completely right" I meant that you still might be right about the thermal energy part. I'm no expert and the moon's atmosphere is nowhere as thick as Earths. Reading back what I wrote, I could see where that would sound a little "dickish" but that wasn't my intent. Sorry for any confusion. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LADEE/news/lunar-atmosphere.html#.VXCQXc9Viko