A busty Canadian woman apparently abandoned modesty in the name of liberty. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/bill-c-51-sister-of-slain-soldier-patrice-vincent-testifies-as-committee-review-resumes-1.3005604 She crashed Parliament Hill topless with the words "C-51 State Terrorism" written in black marker on her sizable bust. This is just a sign of growing protests about Harper's new anti-terror bill that promises police and anti terror agencies sweeping new powers to arrest, interrogate and prevent suspected terrorists from leaving the country, sans evidence. I like her style lol! And not just because she has big tits. This bill is bullshit and more people should be aware of how it will affect them. Canadian border police are already Nazis, they don't need any more power IMO. She got away with just a ticket for public indecency and a year ban from Parliament Hill, which is open to the public.
About as idiotic and useful as the "Free Our Girls" Twitter campaign. People will now cower in fear of this protest.
C-51 seems like Canada's version of the AUMF/NDAA in the U.S. Congrats Canada, you are learning from the best!
It's all in knee jerk reaction to this crackhead dude who apparently visited a mosque once that shot up Parliament Hill and made Harper shit his pants. He got shot by the Seargent at Arms (double tap to the chest) and he did manage to kill one Canadian soldier outside Parliament. Now they're trying to say it's an indication of a huge terror threat and we need more police powers to deal with it, even though police don't use all the powers they have now. It's basically a really stupid, pathetic version of 9/11. 9/11 Lite Look up FEMEN, it's the radical feminist group she is a member of that is obsessed with whipping them out in public
Heh, the easiest way for Canada to stop any real or imagined terrorist threat is to disassociate itself from Washington. But then it wouldn't have a ready-made excuse to expand government power. Haha, there was a group like that in Rochester twenty or so years ago. They were ALL FUGLY. At least the dyke in thread looks maybe doable. I would have to see tits and ass to make an intelligent judgement though.
I know the honey that crashed the Hill at least is pretty sexy. I mean, you need a decent sized rack to fit big words like "state terrorism" on them But her being a radical feminist kind of kills my boner
I'm fairly certain I read on BBC maybe a week or so ago, that the attacker was motivated by Canada's involvement in the Middle East in recent years, particularly in backing the US. Basically, he was radicalized by Canada's support/involvement in military affairs orchestrated by the US, etc. So, you would think the answer would be to look at that, not the knee-jerk reaction to just increase military/government power. But yeah, Harper doesnt seem to run that game.
I mean it's pretty sad when the rantings of one random crackhead can influence Canadian law so profoundly. But fear is a powerful motivator for people it seems.
Wasn't it in Norway a few years ago, when that one person shot up a school event and killed some 50 little kids? I remember Norway's message was not to be intimidated by the attackers and give in to the fear, they didnt pass no reactionary bullshit and vowed to uphold their beliefs and constitution/laws.
Her boobs arnt that great. Let's Smoke About It.... -Adam Demamp My Organic Grow Journal http://forum.grasscity.com/index.php?/topic/1357687-Sade's-Solar-Adventures
Ah yes, the Femen movement. Nudity does certainly garner attention. Google image search " neda topaloski" if you want to see her tits. They're not that great.
Has anyone actually read the context of the bill? or are people just jumping on the libertarian left wing bandwagon to protest something they know nothing about?