Researcher controls colleagues motions in first human brain-to-brain interface

Discussion in 'Science and Nature' started by g0pher, Oct 30, 2014.

  1. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130827122713.htm
    [​IMG]
    University of Washington researchers have performed what they believe is the first noninvasive human-to-human brain interface, with one researcher able to send a brain signal via the Internet to control the hand motions of a fellow researcher.
    \nUsing electrical brain recordings and a form of magnetic stimulation, Rajesh Rao sent a brain signal to Andrea Stocco on the other side of the UW campus, causing Stocco's finger to move on a keyboard.
     
    While researchers at Duke University have demonstrated brain-to-brain communication between two rats, and Harvard researchers have demonstrated it between a human and a rat, Rao and Stocco believe this is the first demonstration of human-to-human brain interfacing.
     
    "The Internet was a way to connect computers, and now it can be a way to connect brains," Stocco said. "We want to take the knowledge of a brain and transmit it directly from brain to brain."
     
    The researchers captured the full demonstration on video recorded in both labs. The version available at the end of this story has been edited for length.
     
    Rao, a UW professor of computer science and engineering, has been working on brain-computer interfacing (BCI) in his lab for more than 10 years and just published a textbook on the subject. In 2011, spurred by the rapid advances in BCI technology, he believed he could demonstrate the concept of human brain-to-brain interfacing. So he partnered with Stocco, a UW research assistant professor in psychology at the UW's Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences.
     
    On Aug. 12, Rao sat in his lab wearing a cap with electrodes hooked up to an electroencephalography machine, which reads electrical activity in the brain. Stocco was in his lab across campus wearing a purple swim cap marked with the stimulation site for the transcranial magnetic stimulation coil that was placed directly over his left motor cortex, which controls hand movement.
     
    The team had a Skype connection set up so the two labs could coordinate, though neither Rao nor Stocco could see the Skype screens.
     
    Rao looked at a computer screen and played a simple video game with his mind. When he was supposed to fire a cannon at a target, he imagined moving his right hand (being careful not to actually move his hand), causing a cursor to hit the "fire" button. Almost instantaneously, Stocco, who wore noise-canceling earbuds and wasn't looking at a computer screen, involuntarily moved his right index finger to push the space bar on the keyboard in front of him, as if firing the cannon. Stocco compared the feeling of his hand moving involuntarily to that of a nervous tic.
     
    "It was both exciting and eerie to watch an imagined action from my brain get translated into actual action by another brain," Rao said. "This was basically a one-way flow of information from my brain to his. The next step is having a more equitable two-way conversation directly between the two brains."
     
    The technologies used by the researchers for recording and stimulating the brain are both well-known. Electroencephalography, or EEG, is routinely used by clinicians and researchers to record brain activity noninvasively from the scalp. Transcranial magnetic stimulation, or TMS, is a noninvasive way of delivering stimulation to the brain to elicit a response. Its effect depends on where the coil is placed; in this case, it was placed directly over the brain region that controls a person's right hand. By activating these neurons, the stimulation convinced the brain that it needed to move the right hand.
     
    Computer science and engineering undergraduates Matthew Bryan, Bryan Djunaedi, Joseph Wu and Alex Dadgar, along with bioengineering graduate student Dev Sarma, wrote the computer code for the project, translating Rao's brain signals into a command for Stocco's brain.
     
    "Brain-computer interface is something people have been talking about for a long, long time," said Chantel Prat, assistant professor in psychology at the UW's Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, and Stocco's wife and research partner who helped conduct the experiment. "We plugged a brain into the most complex computer anyone has ever studied, and that is another brain."
     
    At first blush, this breakthrough brings to mind all kinds of science fiction scenarios. Stocco jokingly referred to it as a "Vulcan mind meld." But Rao cautioned this technology only reads certain kinds of simple brain signals, not a person's thoughts. And it doesn't give anyone the ability to control your actions against your will.
     
    Both researchers were in the lab wearing highly specialized equipment and under ideal conditions. They also had to obtain and follow a stringent set of international human-subject testing rules to conduct the demonstration.
     
    "I think some people will be unnerved by this because they will overestimate the technology," Prat said. "There's no possible way the technology that we have could be used on a person unknowingly or without their willing participation."
     
    Stocco said years from now the technology could be used, for example, by someone on the ground to help a flight attendant or passenger land an airplane if the pilot becomes incapacitated. Or a person with disabilities could communicate his or her wish, say, for food or water. The brain signals from one person to another would work even if they didn't speak the same language.
     
    Rao and Stocco next plan to conduct an experiment that would transmit more complex information from one brain to the other. If that works, they then will conduct the experiment on a larger pool of subjects.
     
    Their research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation's Engineering Research Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering at the UW, the U.S. Army Research Office and the National Institutes of Health.
     

     
     
  2. For the swarm!

    -yuri
     
  3. Wow that is really interesting. I can only wonder how this sort of technology will be used in the future. It would be amazing if we could get two brains to speak to one another in a similar way. It'd be like a phone call where you never actually speak; you just think.
     
  4. A collective consciousness could be formed this way. We could become very intelligent just using the power of all of us thinking at once. Cool concept.


    Sent from my iPhone using Grasscity Forum
     
  5.  
    We have that, it is called the internet. 
     
  6. Yup

    Practically speaking humans already have a primitive hivemind.

    -yuri
     
  7.  
    What would be the applications of something like what is discussed in the article? I highly doubt people will ever be comfortable with communicating by thought for there are niceties and things we all think but do not say for various reasons. Is the intent to allow a surgeon in India to be as capable as one renowned and practicing in NYC? 
     
  8. Your views are shortsighted

    Have you seen the TV show dollhouse?

    This technology is in its infancy

    Have you thought about military applications?

    Squads of soldiers that can see through eachothers eyes, think and move as one?

    Fleets of jetfighters perfectly synchronized

    What about education? What if a teacher could communicate instantly to billions of students?

    This technology is amazing and terrifying

    -yuri
     
  9. #9 Alaric, Nov 8, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 8, 2014
     
    I doubt it will ever be used for anything you just mentioned. Unless it is in robotics, which is my point. Humans do not need to control the abilities of others unless it is for a very specific task, we do not need telepathy. It would not help us communicate at all, you cannot just implant memories or ideas in the human brain. That is why there is brain washing, you have to immerse the brain to get it to absorb information. With the exception of passing electrical signals(probably more like replicating) between areas of the brain this technology is useless and we have been doing it from human to robot for years. Which is where the real and smart money is.
     
  10. #10 yurigadaisukida, Nov 9, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 9, 2014
    So you deny the fact that sending a thought is faster and more.efficient than sending a vocal.command and waiting for a response?

    Sorry but you are wrong

    Fact is its much much much faster and more efficient to send a thought and control an action then to communicate a command to another human

    -yuri
     

Share This Page