Proving you are a covert agent is easy when you do not even try to be accountable. Just try and find the root meaning of the word idiot. I dare you.
The title of this thread is about covert agents infiltrating forums I see the mods don't move this shit to Pandora's anymore Time to remake the 911 truth thread! -yuri
Your participation and that of your counterparts is all the proof that is needed. Cognitive infiltration is well reported with evidence from its foreign government source. No sincere, decent American would participate as you have with obvious unaccountability and constant misrepresentation with deception.
This thread is meta and conspiratorial. It belongs in Pandora's Box. Ah oh, it was moved. They must have got the word from higher up to put you in the conspiracy section to ridicule and dismiss you.
It is supported by facts, and your unaccountable, selective, manipulative, deceptive posting is another fact supporting that the politics forum is heavily infiltrated.
If we really are infiltrators then we are covert Case and.point - everyone thinks your crazy I guess we win -yuri
Only the unaccountable and they do not matter. I think that might be two. Of course everyone has no experience with what I'm dealing with and I've proven the scope of it, so they do not know, and you do not want them to.
Anybody that disagrees with you is considered unaccountable by your own absolutes and circular logic. That is not how accountability works. You cannot even discuss and entertain an idea that conflicts with your own. Your own anecdotal experience isn't proof.
I know it is ridiculous to think that you would be the judge of the validity of the evidence of your own guilt. The lurkers that are wondering WTF a cognitive infiltrator is are reading and noting how often you distort, how often you evade, how often you misrepresent, how often you fail to be accountable. How inconsistent all that is with someone that complains about government, when I'm proposing using law, a method of the people becoming the rightful masters of the congress and the courts to stop governmental abuses and you diss it.
There are two basic forms of accountability. One relies on external evidence, facts that corroborate, the other on common knowledge reasoning and logic. When others do not misrepresent, or do not intentionally misinterpret AND use one form or the other of accountability actions, they can disagree and they can change my mind. If you can't do that, then you are not reasonable and not accountable. Absolutes will mean nothing you, so how could you possibly see them as shared.
The factors that indicate participation in a psyops are those actions that oppose human unity needed for preserving rights and freedoms. Particularly a group action not preceded by adequate discussion to signify a proper, reasonable, cognitive alignment for that purpose. Anything which opposes defense of the constitution by uses of constitutional rights that are used with the intention to defend the constitution fits the psyops description. Any effort to degrade the meanings of constitutional intent is clearly an attack upon Americans potential capacity for unity needed to defend the principles of the republic.
I agree with everything and these psyops are said it's sad what these programmers can do, remember me Christopher.