Sensation Vs Solution-What Does The Nwo Want?

Now I'm showing how you may be correct and agreeing that violence may be needed to get the current infiltrated government to obey the amended constitution, and you do not like it.

There is a huge difference in the violence you assert is needed and that which I agree may happen.

What I suggest occurs AFTER a long, legal, due process occurs making certain offices, departments and agencies obviously, improperly occupied by enemies of the state.

A state of OUR republic which has been lawfully tested and purified by amending its constitution.

You and vicious suggest Americans will need, and that it is best, to just begin an armed. Violent revolution.

BIG DIFFERENCE!

 

For the unity needed to use "alter and abolish", Article V, and defend unalienable rights as in, The Declaration of Independence.

You've never shown that. Besides, the phrase is natural law and it is HOW the phrase is applied that matters. Context.

I support that humanity NOT destroy its air and water. How I propose doing that is opposite the NWO agenda. The people do it because they need air and water, not government.

You/vicious have gotten that comment last night and immediately tried to use my citation of the 2nd amendment to imply it was Marxist.

I am against corporations having individual rights. I've acknowledged numerous times some corporations are very much needed and have integrity.

Correct! You are against a lawful and peaceful revolution and have posted all of the above misrepresentations in an attempt to oppose the plan I've put forth for Americans to unify around a definition of free speech and control their states, then proceed to an Article V convention with preparatory amendment, ending the abridging of free speech, securing the vote and reforming campaign finance.

You pretend to be an activist for positive change but in reality, covertly, you oppose it.

 

Or someone with actual evidence it was not a valid definition of the purpose of free speech or interpretation of constitutional intent with plan & process for a lawful, peaceful revolution.

It's freakin common sense, all of it.

 

 
 
LOL!  Common sense indicates you are not here for activism.  Q-So why are you here?  A-Look at what you are doing.  One thing, bashing the proposed lawful and peaceful revolution.
 
Q-What sincere activist would do that?    A-One that had a better plan, or did not, could not believe in the Constitution for the united states of America.  Or, someone pretending to be an activist.
 
Q-Who would pretend to be an activist?  A-An agent covertly infiltrating activists to try and prevent unity and successful activism against agendas of those directing them.

 

Potheads can be activists for constitutional defense. But your only activism is working to prevent the unity needed for a lawful and peaceful revolution.

It's obvious.

 

As I've stated in the past, the label of "troll" was invented so traitors could be seen as assholes enabling them to more effectively continue supporting treason.

Your agenda is careless and wantonly undisguised. You've tried attacking every aspect of Americans utilization of the constitution with its intent, to try and induce the viewer to dismiss the plan for a lawful and peaceful revolution.

You've stated you cared about the environment, then tried to use the fact that I do, try and mis represent me as a communist in favor of agenda 21.

It is quite clear to any who read these threads that you will use anything to try and marginalize a plan based in legal process, WHICH INCLUDES Americans having the capacity to define constitutional intent as "the rightful masters of the congress and the courts" to assure all amendments from an Article V convention have constitutional intent. That would be the purpose of free speech.

You've said you would like to see an Article V convention. However, by default, if you do not empower Americans to define and know constitutional intent then control their states with it, you are empowering corporations like the Koch bothers do with ALEC to conduct an unconstitutional convention favoring corporate profits over the environment, justice and civil rights.

Your agenda is clear, but sloppily executed exposing the agenda from a covert position with pretense.

 

 

 
Spoken like an infiltrator, or one so conditioned, that they do not know the difference.  In that case, you need the doc.

 

LOL, I've schooled at least twice on what cognitive dissonance, and you STILL do not know.

OMG!

It's pretty clear you've got a mental problem and cannot separate objectiveness from the subjective, what you think, well enough to EVEN learn.

Your inability to realize the amount of cognitive distortion you use was an early tip off to your uses of your mostly internal perspective. You didn't know the difference between cognitive dissonance and distortion, and now we learn, you can't learn.

 

Yuri, this is the third time I've provided a link explaining what cognitive dissonance is.

The fact of that indicates what is in your mind is what matters to you and is your perception of the reality. That IS the definition of subjectivity.

http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/cognitive_dissonance.htm

Description
This is the feeling of uncomfortable tension which comes from holding two conflicting thoughts in the mind at the same time.

Objectivity is when facts of the external world are cognitively assimilated and used in reasoning together.

Twice you have failed to use the definitions of the external world and instead you rely on your internal perception of cognitive dissonance in attempting to define it. What you are defining is the symptom or effect of dissonance, not cognitive dissonance.

It increasingly appears that you have a mental disability that just happens to have you behaving as a cognitive infiltrator.

When you fail to reason simple things like the social implications of things like our appreciation of each other's survival instinct and how our mutual respect for information vital to survival has natural priority related to a root purpose for free speech, I am shown proof of something!

Now I consider it a mental disability because you are NOT learning.

Your brain is not working quite right.

That is your subjective opinion and because moderators and others are making an effort to sort out your dysfunctions and make them clear along with that which I do, you simply continue without realizing what you are doing.

It takes a village to raise a child.