If Free Speech Had A Purpose, Would You Recognize It?-This Your 1St Right

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ChristopherABrown, Aug 31, 2014.

  1. I feel like this response was auto generated by a computer...

    Sent from my LG-E739 using Grasscity Forum mobile app
     
  2. Answer anyway you poor thing.
     
  3. Why humor the Illuminati? Your just a paid shill trying tito make the nwo conspiracy look like a loony bin idea.

    I'm done with your misinformation you arent fooling anyone

    Sent from my LG-E739 using Grasscity Forum mobile app
     
  4. #84 ChristopherABrown, Sep 16, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 16, 2014
     You've shown no proof I'm anything but what I say I am and all of my posting shows I'm working against the NWO by supporting the constitution and amendment to return prime constitutional rights.  This process of a lawful and peaceful revolution.
     
    -------------------
    NOTICE:

    This below, is the process I've posted four times now.  It totally kicks ass.  Sure it is working for an ideal, but why not?  Cannot give up on ideals of rights and freedoms.

    --------------------

    A) Can you understand and accept that the root purpose of free speech is to assure information vital to survival is shared and understood?

    B) Can you accept that purpose of free speech as prime constitutional intent?

    C) Can you accept that EVERY American can understand and accept A)?

    D) Are you aware that in 1911, 2/3 of the states applied for a convention and congress violated the law, their oath and the constitution by failing to convene delegates?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs7qIQ1VkEg
    http://patriotaction.net/forum/topic...etter-to-clerk
    Can you accept that such a fact justifies that all delegates are elected in the states by the people of the states?

    E) Can you understand that any state legislator that cannot accept A), can be impeached in this constitutional emergency as being unfit for office?

    F)Can you understand and accept that A) B) C) D) & E) are legal process and that IF citizens D) for justification, and E) to complete the legal process they WILL be "the rightful masters of the congress and the courts" BECAUSE their states, as the people, then will agree that proper preparation for Article V consists of;

    1) Ending the abridging of free speech

    2) Securing the vote

    3) Campaign finance reform

    G) And such preparation by amendment is completely constitutional and can only enable democratic assertion of the principles of the republic once complete; WHEREUPON all amendment ceases until America can assure it is competent to Article V by testing itself to assure it knows and can define constitutional intent?

    Please answer by letter and numbered paragraph so it is very clear.
     
     
     
     
    Why are you not interested in assuring robust function for free speech making "the people the rightful masters of the congress and the courts?"
     
  5. The understanding of free speech in society as it operates from the social instincts of each person led to the development of the pragmatic statement of the "purpose of free speech".  This page has it.
     
    http://algoxy.com/poly/meaning_of_free_speech.html
     ​
     ​
    To be "the rightful masters of the congress and the courts" as Abraham Lincoln described us, the people, in September 17, 1859, during speech in Illinois , is needed for integration into the First Amendment as a function of an Article V convention.
    The people of the United States
are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts,
not to overthrow the Constitution,
but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."
     ​
     
    The mechanism for doing that is Article V, our FIRST constitutional and most important right because it is the right to "alter or abolish" from the Declaration of Independence, codified.
    The "Greater Meaning Of Free Speech" is or was, an actual, practiced philosophical doctrine. The "meaning" is derived from an understanding that can come from the practice of free speech. From the understanding can come; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love, protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
     
    When we ingrate the meaning into the FIrst Amendment by revision, our society will change for the good.  And to show how possible this ideal is to manifest, examine a simple reality based on the knowledge of a parent of this proposal.
     
    <i>Which mother or father in this nation will ignore or pass up the real opportunity to assure their child will grow into a nation that holds high and honors understanding that can create; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love, protecting their life, their liberty and their pursuit of happiness?</i>
     
    The unity these concepts can create if shared are the basis for the unity needed to create and manage a lawful and peaceful revolution in America.
     
    Why are these posters here against this?  WHY?
     
  6. no one here has shown any.proof of anything

    Please site spources without using.conspiracy sites.

    Sent from my LG-E739 using Grasscity Forum mobile app
     
  7.  
    What more do we need then the actual text of the First Amendment:
     
    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
     
    The "root purpose" of the first amendment is clearly established.  It's purpose is to protect citizen's religious freedom, our right to protest and our right to a free press, without prosecution.
     
  8. #88 yurigadaisukida, Sep 16, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 16, 2014
    I said the ssame thing earlier which got me accused of being a cognitive infiltraitor.

    Sent from my LG-E739 using Grasscity Forum mobile app
     
  9.  
    The pretense that the constitution is perfect is proven wrong by the political difficulties we are faced with.  Natural law and constitutional intent are THE PEOPLES right to define.  Are you saying you want no part of defining it and prefer using what is very likely deficient and responsible for the problems we have?
     
    Would you consider this example of a press controlled by government interests and example of our right to a free press?
     
    http://algoxy.com/law/no_free_press/sbsecretsofmedia.html
     
    If free speech cannot be used to protect life without massive amounts of money, how does the right to life receive protection?
     
  10.  
    It was your unaccountability and continuous use of cognitive distortions which earned you that label.
     
  11. No it was your paranoia.

    Sent from my LG-E739 using Grasscity Forum mobile app
     
  12.  
    Another cognitive distortion of labeling incompetently used to evade becoming informed of serious events impairing our first right.
     
  13. So do you have any non conspiracy sources or is this going to be one of those you talk in circles till people get tired of your shit and this thread gets ignored kinda posts?


    Sent from my iPod touch using Grasscity Forum
     
  14.  
    The thread is really about the purpose of free speech.  A refusal to use available information lead to off topic posting.
     
      Do you think free speech has a social purpose?​
     
    If it does, would accept that purpose to assure that information vital to survival be shared and understood?
     
  15. #95 Account_Banned283, Sep 17, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2014
     
    Free speech is the right through which one can freely speak purposefully, that is, for whatever purpose one chooses to speak for - any good coginfil knows that, why don't you?
     
  16. No. If ssomeone claims they saw a unicorn and I say "pics or it didn't happen" that is not cognitive distortion (which is something you made up by the way)

    You haven't cited ANY of your claims. The links are to other people making claims

    Maybe Im wrong. Maybe you can spood feed me. Please show me.some evidence

    Sent from my LG-E739 using Grasscity Forum mobile app
     
  17. #97 ChristopherABrown, Sep 17, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 17, 2014
    So how then does freedom of speech protect life, a need, greater than a want?
     
  18. #98 ChristopherABrown, Sep 17, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 17, 2014
    Cognitive distortions are what I say they are.

    http://psychcentral.com/lib/15-common-cognitive-distortions/0002153

    A covert group can pretend they are real and induce those observing to have incorrect cognition.

    Claims are not cited. Claims are asserted and evidence supporting them is cited. Quotations are cited, statutes are cited.

    Why I have to spood feed someone that can so clearly state that nations are not capitalistic or socialistic, I do not know.
     
  19. #99 Account_Banned283, Sep 17, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2014
     
    It doesn't.. people choosing to freely speak/communicate in such a way as to help them survive is what protects their life - there is no ''purpose'' to it other than to serve as an ethical/moral right to allow each human to freely speak/communicate without restriction.
     
  20. You just proved my point. The purpose of the law, the right, serves he purpose of freedom of speech by protecting it.
     

Share This Page