I'm saying all the planes were CGI, That is an obvious layering mistake. Another thing that is suspect is molten pools of steel were found at the WTC site, steel melts at 2750 degrees Fahrenheit, yet jet fuel burns at a max temperature of 1800 degrees Fahrenheit. Yet we are told to believe that the burning jet fuel caused the steel to melt. The twin towers are also the only buildings to EVER be brought down by a "fire." And the towers were on fire for less than 2 and a half hours before their collapse?
You realize that an operating sky scraper is made of more than steel right? If it were only steel, then the building would still be under construction
Ummm Do you have any idea how hot those fires were burning? Office chairs, papers, electronics, insulation, not to mention jet fuel... Also when metal heats it expands then contracts, weakening the integrity of the steel. And lastly building were meant to fall like that..
Unless you've fought fire, you don't realize the power of it. A structure fire with that much fuel that's like giving an alcoholic a key to a bar
:lol: :lol: First of all, when did I claim it was built only of steel? And second why would that even matter? Molten steel was found. Jet fuel and office supplies can't cause the steel that was in the building to "MELT LIKE LAVA" as the firefighters said. It amazes me that people still have faith in the "official story" I used to believe the official story too, until I looked into it more and more. If it was indeed burning that hot, due to office chairs, papers, electric, (already talked about how jet fuel cant cause it) how did Satam Suqami's paper passport survive the fire in PRISTINE CONDITION and magically fall out of his pocket out of the plane and onto the ground below? Where not a mere mortal found it, but an fbi agent. So that fire was hot enough to melt steel but not hot enough to burn a paper passport AT ALL?? Oh how convenient that is. And its not like the government wouldn't kill its own people over a false flag, the gulf of tonkin (what got us into vietnam) has been proven to be a false flag operation. There were 50,000 US military deaths and over 2 million Vietnamese civilians died. Governments staging terror attacks to get support for wars = typical. And what about WTC 7? Buildings 3,4,5 and 6 which were closer didn't collapse. Building 5 was cut in half and didn't collapse! But building 7 which was 300 yards away did? Because of "debris" This is so absurd. Inst it so convenient that they didn't include building 7 in the commission report? And what?? When BBC was reporting that WTC 7 fell.. it was still standing? If that doesn't tell you things were faked that day then I don't know how your thought process works. It's funny how I hear more assumptions and wild accusations from people backing up the official story, than I do from people backing up the so called conspiracy "theory".
It comes back to Cui bono really. If people think the US government benefited from 9/11 overall, they are just kidding themselves. They passed they PATRIOT Act afterwards, which might have been a calculated move or it might have just been a response to intense pressure to do something about it. But taking down a building as important as the Word Trade Center is a practical and symbolic victory for America's enemies. It was terrible for the country's morale, and a huge embarrassment for the administration in office at the time. Plus these guys targeted the World Trade Center before anyways. Anyone who reads up on 9/11 is bound to know about the failed truck bombings in 93(I think 93). So was that the US government's first failed attempt to blow up their own building, and then they waited almost 10 years to try again? Or was it terrorists in '93 and the US gov in '01?
Individuals within the US government, and related private sectors had interest in allowing the 9/11 attacks to occur. There was deliberate miscommunication/negligence (information being ignored or not passed along) between departments (FBI, CIA, NSA) and the alleged hijackers recieved funding and training in the US. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1567815.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/identities.html http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Atta,_alcohol,_strip_clubs_and_drugs http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hijackers-lived-with-fbi-informant/ http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/25/national/25HIJA.html http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=129563 http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Hijackers_trained_by_US_military%3F http://www.wanttoknow.info/010915newsweek http://www.globalresearch.ca/9-11-attacks-criminal-foreknowledge-and-insider-trading-lead-directly-to-the-cia-s-highest-ranks/32323 http://stj911.org/evidence/foreknowledge.html http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_during_the_September_11_attacks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_operations_and_exercises_on_September_11,_2001 http://tarpley.net/docs/drills_of_911.pdf http://youtu.be/n_fp5kaVYhk http://youtu.be/MAYrVarn_MY http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html http://www.globalresearch.ca/9-11-who-really-benefited/25762 http://www.corbettreport.com/episode-067-the-911-money-trail/ http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FIT403A.html http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/owners.html http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silverstein.html http://youtu.be/mWLis-TVB2w http://youtu.be/U9J_0Xfj0n0 Taking down the World Trade Center was a huge gain for Larry Silverstein (multi-billion dollar pay-out instead of paying millions of dollars to address asbestos problems in the complex). It was also a huge gain for the offices located in WTC 7 (Salomon Smith Barney, IRS Regional Council, US Secret Service, CIA, American Express Bank International, Standard Chartered Bank, Provident Financial Management, ITT Hartford Insurance Group, First State Management Group, Federal Home Loan Bank, NAIC Securities, Securities & Exchange Commission, Mayor's Office of Emergency Management), as evidence and records were destroyed along with the building. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/gold.html http://web.archive.org/web/20020214102835/http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/files/nov/01/arjj110101.htm http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/cutter.html http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/evidence.html http://911review.com/attack/wtc/b7.html You allude to the 1993 WTC bombing as a possible government-orchestrated/assisted attack. The FBI has assisted many terrorist plots in order to neccesitate its position as a government agency. This undermines national security in order to create a need for such government overreach. This is similar to how the US arms foreign nations it is currently occupying in order to prolong conflicts and create instability (which neccessitates further government intervention) http://youtu.be/_2vpcABWJiY http://youtu.be/g-vVqieLG_c http://youtu.be/TBobEiXInxQ http://rt.com/usa/fbi-terror-report-plot-365-899/ http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-helped-along-by-the-fbi.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Thank you. The documentation and testimony is there and it is up to individuals if they are willing to really explore the possibilities and horrendous truths.
Which most are not unfortunately, I have respect for like minded individuals like yourself who are willing to see past the lies.