Do You Guys Think Romney Would Have Done A Better Job Than Obama?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nativetongues, Jun 25, 2014.

  1. #1 nativetongues, Jun 25, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 25, 2014
    Honestly I don't know where I stand on this issue, but if I had to choose again Id probably go with Obama again, cause I have no faith in a shill like Romney. Was wondering what you other blades thought about this hypothetical. I don't want this to become a straight Obama bashing thread. There's plenty of things that myself and I'm sure you other blades have an issue with that he's done, but the question is would Romney have done anything different or better than Obama.
     
  2. He wouldn't be able to get away with as much crooked shit, so technically, yes. But he would damn sure try to do the same evil shit.
     
  3. Why couldn't he, because he wasn't an incumbent?
     
  4. 6 of one 1/2 dozen of the other.
     
    neither of them would do a significantly better job than the other.. someone always gets fucked whether it be the poor, sick, small business people, home owners etc.
     
    as far as the weed issue i'd say that IF Romney had won that election, i don't think the fed would be as lax about weed as they are right now... but otherwise, it's a coin flip. They both have ultra powerful friends that they have to do favors for.
     
  5. #5 Crony, Jun 25, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 12, 2014
    Hard to say at this point..
     
  6. Depends on if you consider a white puppet better or a black puppet better.
     
  7. He probably would have more hawkish than Obama.
     
  8. Because he's white.
     
  9. dont know but im glad i dont have to use medicare vouchers
     
  10. I liked Ron Paul. the smartest person who ran.
     
  11. You flip a coin, sometimes you get heads, sometimes you get tails. But its still the same coin.
     
  12. I voted Gary Johnson last round only because marijuana.
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmMkYckAAIM
     
  13.  
    Obama is both.
     
    My personal opinion, there would be no difference. The only difference would be the PR spin and public perception.
     
    "The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes." - Felix Frankfurter US Supreme Court Justice
     
  14. The last 2 prezadunce prove that they can put any dummy in the seat.
     
    I'm just riding on top watching for when they run it into the ditch so I can hop off and hit the ground running.
     
  15. This.
     
    And the answer is no.
     
  16. Would Romney have done a better job of expanding government than Yomamma has?
     
    Probably not.
     
    Yomamma has a free pass to do whatever he wants cuz he has semi-black skin.
     
  17.  
    i don't think that has anything to do with it.. he has a free pass because the media is in love with him and/or his party. Don't think it's because he's black..
     
  18.  
    The liberals all wetted themselves when they *finally* got to vote for a black. My sister and her husband (in their mid '60s) certainly did and my (mid-80s) neighbors also.
     
    It mattered nothing what the man is, just that he had black skin. The fact that he is a big-government socialist/fascist was just icing on the proverbial cake. Voters don't get any choice on that issue, from either party.
     
    Substance means nothing to the vast majority of voters, but even less to statists. At least from my observations.
     
  19. #19 *ColtClassic*, Jun 25, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 25, 2014
     
    I think there is a strong correlation between the left/democratic spectrum of the two-party (turnstyle) political system and prefferential treatment of ethnically diverse individuals/groups. Where Obama might not be completely exempt from accountability, he will certainly receive the benefit of the doubt and special exceptions because people are (or were at his time of election and re-election) eager for more diverse individuals in positions of power and are willing to sacrifice their principles and standards to meet this goal. Often people will skew their perceptions/analysis to fit their expectations.
     
    If you want, pm me for relevant videos, it is sacry to see how voters will compromise for superficial prerequisites.
     
  20. Obama fascist? Wouldn't go that far. He's right of center in an objective view of his presidency which has certainly been average. Romney would be doing the exact same shit albeit pushing a conservative social agenda which I wouldn't abide by. Obama has certainly done the horrid with the foreign drone policy but the bullshit spin on Benghazi is just horrid considering embassies well documented history of beig attacked from time to time. But as far as the drones go, I think they were inevitably going to be used more regardless of party
     

Share This Page