Ground-Breaking Technique Traces Dna Direct To Your Ancestors Home 1,000 Years Ago

Discussion in 'Science and Nature' started by MelT, May 1, 2014.

  1. Tracing where your DNA was formed over 1,000 years ago is now possible, thanks to a revolutionary technique developed by a team of international scientists led by experts from the University of Sheffield.
     

    The ground-breaking Geographic Population Structure (GPS) tool, created by Dr Eran Elhaik from the University of Sheffield's Department of Animal and Plant Sciences and Dr Tatiana Tatarinova from the University of Southern California, works similarly to a satellite navigation system as it helps you to find your way home, but not the one you currently live in -- but rather your actual ancestor's home from 1,000 years ago.
    Previously, scientists have only been able to locate where your DNA was formed to within 700kms, which in Europe could be two countries away; however this pioneering technique has been 98 per cent successful in locating worldwide populations to their right geographic regions, and down to their village and island of origin.
    The breakthrough of knowing where the gene pools that created your DNA were last mixed has massive implications for life-saving personalised medicine, advancing forensic science and for the study of populations whose ancestral origins are under debate, such as African Americans, Roma gypsies and European Jews.
    Genetic admixture occurs when individuals from two or more previously separated populations begin interbreeding. This results in the creation of new gene pools representing a mixture of the founder gene pool.
    Such processes are extremely common in history during migrations and invasions, for example, when the Vikings invaded Britain and Europe in the 11th Century and settled with locals some of them formed a new Viking-Anglo-Saxon gene pool, but some married other Vikings and maintained their original gene pool, allowing GPS to trace their Scandinavian origins.
    Dr Eran Elhaik said: "If we think of our world as being made up of different colours of soup -- representing different populations -- it is easy to visualise how genetic admixture occurs. If a population from the blue soup region mixes with a population from the red soup region their off-springs would appear as a purple soup.
    "The more genetic admixture that takes place, the more different colours of soup are introduced which makes it increasingly difficult to locate your DNA's ancestry using traditional tools like Spatial Ancestry analysis (SPA) which has an accuracy level of less than two per cent."
    He added: "What we have discovered here at the University of Sheffield is a way to find not where you were born -- as you have that information on your passport -- but where your DNA was formed up to 1,000 years ago by modelling these admixture processes.
    "What is remarkable is that, we can do this so accurately that we can locate the village where your ancestors lived hundreds and hundreds of years ago -- until now this has never been possible."
    To demonstrate how accurate GPS predictions are, Dr Elhaik and his colleagues analysed data from 10 villages in Sardinia and over 20 islands in Oceania. The research published today in the journal Nature Communications shows that Dr Elhaik and his team were able to place a quarter of the residents in Sardinia directly to their home village and most of the remaining residents within 50km of their village. The results for Oceania were no less impressive with almost 90 per cent success of tracing islanders exactly to their island.
    "This is a significant improvement compared to the alternative SPA tool that placed Oceanians in India," said Elhaik.
    "In his third book, children's author L. Frank Baum revealed that Oz resided around Australia. It always troubled me that if I ever met anyone claiming to be from the wonderful world of Oz, I would like to be able to verify their origins and now we can!
    "This technique also means that we can no longer easily classify people's ethnic identities with one single label. It is impossible for any of us to tick one box on a form such as White British or African as we are much complex models with our own unique identities. The notion of races is simply not plausible."
    Tracing our ancestry is now a major social trend and genealogy is the number one hobby in America. An estimated one million people in the USA have already had their DNA genotyped. People can explore their DNA by simply taking a swab from inside their mouth and sending it to a company such as 23andme or ancestry.com for costs ranging from $99-$200.
    Dr Elhaik's co-author, Dr Tatiana Tatarinova, developed a website making GPS accessible to the public.
    "To help people find their roots, I developed a website that allows anyone who has had their DNA genotyped to upload their results and use GPS to find their ancestral home," said Dr Tatarinova, who is also an Associate Professor of Research Paediatrics at the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California.
    "We were surprised by the simplicity and precision of this method. People in a given geographical area are more likely to have similar genetics. When they also have genetic traits typically found in other, distant regions, the geographical origin of those traits is generally the closest location where those traits can be found."
    According to the researchers, in ethnically-diverse regions like the UK or US, where many people know only a few generations of their descendants, this kind of screening has huge, important medical implications.
    Discovery of a certain genotype might indicate the potential for a genetic disease and suggest that diagnostic testing be done. Also, as scientists learn more about personalized medicine, there is evidence that specific genotypes respond differently to medications -- making this information potentially useful when selecting the most effective therapy and appropriate dosage. The investigators are currently designing a study to correlate pharmacokinetics -- the time course of drug metabolism -- with genotype.
    Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aap-s1kle4Q

     
     
  2. #2 LuxTenebris, May 1, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2014
    Id totally do that if I had the money, sounds really cool
     
  3. This is nothing new.  The technology and services have been offered for several.  I've always wanted to do it but when do I ever have an extra couple hundred laying around to spend on curiosity.  I got bills to pay!
     
  4. personalized medicine based on genetics is still largely just a junk science alternative medicine buzzword at this point. just felt like adding that.

    what i never got is exactly how theyre supposed to know location based on genes. surely they can tell which genes got mixed and with what, but whats to say the people werent traveling extensively?
     
  5.  
    Me too.:)
     
    MelT
     
  6. Late to the party, but I'd totally have this done. If I had the money, I'd have anything n everything searched out in terms of my DNA. One possible benefit of knowing your lineage is your diet. Knowing where your ancestors came from and what they had to eat could help you plan a better diet, one more suited for your genes.. and jeans.
     
  7. mantikore, it isn't that expensive any more! Both Ancestry and 23 and Me have DNA testing for just under $100. I've had both done. 23 gives a better genetic profile, including what % of Neanderthal genes you have. Ancestry is better at hooking you up with folks with family trees to see where your ancestors overlap.  I think you get more "bang for your buck" at 23. 
     
    Granny
     
  8. hmm ive always wanted to take a dive into my ancestry as i know nothing past 1 grandmother....but i would love to see where any ancestors where 1000 years ago.
     
  9. #9 waktoo, May 9, 2014
    Last edited: May 9, 2014
    C'mon, Granny!  Don't leave us hangin'...
     
    So where are your genes from?
     
    How much Neanderthal do you have in you?
     
    I'm seriously curious...
     
  10.  
    Yeah, I looked into those.. but still has to wait for me, lol. Until I get my Lyme wrapped up, or whatever it is that's dragging me down, I keep myself in a perpetual broke hermit state. I remember seeing something about 23 and Me working on designer babies using the data they've collected from people, which is totally cool with me.. kind of a smart plan if they are. I will be having all kinds of data mined from me once I break free.
     
  11. #11 Storm Crow, May 9, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: May 9, 2014
    2.7% Neanderthal, about average.  Mom's side is about as white as you can get. Germans who migrated to Russia with Catharine the Great (who was a German princess).  She offered the Germans a sweet deal- free land, lower taxes and exemption from the draft!  My ancestors settled near the Volga river and remained a little bit of Germany in the middle of Russia! They only rarely married outside of the group. (When the "no more draft" was revoked by a later government, my grandpa split for America!)
     
    Dad's side is quite the opposite! A genealogical tangle with more than one mystery to solve!  Tangle? Let's just say that my grandmother was her own cousin!  And there was, at least, one bastard passed off as the child of the husband (he knew)- which is how black and native American got into that side of the family. I suppose you want the whole "family scandal" story, now...
     
    Ancestress of mine was kidnapped by Charlie Amathala (minor historic figure whose death started the Seminole Wars) and some of his boys. She apparently "got passed around" and was returned later by treaty rather pregnant. She set the blame on Charlie. But Charlie, besides being a bit of a SOB, was also a bit of a racist! He was quite proud of the fact that he was pure blood Native American and said so more than once! Since the DNA shows both native American and black- Charlie is ruled out as bio-dad!
     
    Some of his crew, on the other hand were of mixed blood. The reason so many of you are "part Cherokee" is that the Cherokee and several other tribes were matrilineal. That means it didn't matter who dad was, you were part of your mother's clan/tribe and her brothers filled the male role model instead of bio-dad!  Also before marriage, sleeping around a bit was expected of all young people as a part of growing up. As a result there were a lot of mixed race babies!
     
    So the young lady was returned as a result of a treaty, and much to her fiance's credit, he married her and raised the child as his own. My dad never said just who it was, but by elimination due to geography and age, I have it narrowed down to two gals, but I think I know which one. One had a son born just BEFORE she was married (but that was more common than you'd think! lol).
     
    So I get the results from my brother's "Y" and much to my surprise our paternal line starts with a "E1b1a7a". Now this is doubly interesting for me since that line ends suddenly with my "brick wall" g-g-grandfather, who had an interesting middle name. He also states in the 1860 census that his parents were from North Carolina.  Now E1b1a7a has its origins in Africa, and there is a family of mixed race people in North Carolina that have that same unusual name running through their family.  I think that my gg-grandpappy may have been a mixed race man who was able to "pass" as white. His family moved to a new state, Alabama, and changed their race to match their appearance!
     
    So Granny is a mongrel! lol 
     
    There are other interesting stories in my tree, but the hubby is threatening to smoke a pipe without me, so .....Bye!
     
     
    Granny
     
  12.  
     
    Damn, Granny!  Now that's some genetic history... really cool.
     
    Ultimately, the majority of us are all mutts.
     
    Thanks for sharing!
     
  13. Everyone's families have these stories!  You just have to dig for them a bit! Talk with your grandparents and you'll see! I wish I had taken the time to talk with my paternal grandmother when I had the time! (My other 3 grandparents died when I was too young to understand.)
     
    Granny
     
  14. Human genome project...
     
  15.  
    No, this is new. The previous tests couldn't isolate ancestors with such geographical accuracy.
     
    MelT
     

Share This Page