US army unable to stem tide of servicemen suicides

Discussion in 'Politics' started by MelT, Aug 20, 2013.

  1. \tUS military struggling to stop suicide epidemic among war veteransLast year, more active-duty soldiers killed themselves than died in combat. And after a decade of deployments to war zones, the Pentagon is bracing for things to get much worse



    William Busbee was in many ways the archetype of the US soldier, and his mother feels he was let down by the army he loved so much. Photograph: Libby Busbee

    Libby Busbee is pretty sure that her son William never sat through or read Shakespeare's Macbeth, even though he behaved as though he had. Soon after he got back from his final tour of Afghanistan, he began rubbing his hands over and over and constantly rinsing them under the tap.
     
    "Mom, it won't wash off," he said.
    "What are you talking about?" she replied.
    "The blood. It won't come off."
     
    On 20 March last year, the soldier's striving for self-cleanliness came to a sudden end. That night he locked himself in his car and, with his mother and two sisters screaming just a few feet away and with Swat officers encircling the vehicle, he shot himself in the head.
    At the age of 23, William Busbee had joined a gruesome statistic. In 2012, for the first time in at least a generation, the number of active-duty soldiers who killed themselves, 177, exceeded the 176 who were killed while in the war zone. To put that another way, more of America's serving soldiers died at their own hands than in pursuit of the enemy.
    [​IMG]<span> Credit: Guardian graphics </span>Across all branches of the US military and the reserves, a similar disturbing trend was recorded. In all, 349 service members took their own lives in 2012, while a lesser number, 295, died in combat.
    Shocking though those figures are, they are as nothing compared with the statistic to which Busbee technically belongs. He had retired himself from the army just two months before he died, and so is officially recorded at death as a veteran – one of an astonishing 6,500 former military personnel who killed themselves in 2012, roughly equivalent to one every 80 minutes.
    \t'He wanted to be somebody, and he loved the army'Busbee's story, as told to the Guardian by his mother, illuminates crucial aspects of an epidemic that appears to be taking hold in the US military, spreading alarm as it grows. He personifies the despair that is being felt by increasing numbers of active and retired service members, as well as the inability of the military hierarchy to deal with their anguish.
    That's not, though, how William Busbee's story began. He was in many ways the archetype of the American soldier. From the age of six he had only one ambition: to sign up for the military, which he did when he was 17.
    "He wasn't the normal teenager who went out and partied," Libby Busbee said. "He wanted to be somebody. He had his mind set on what he wanted to do, and he loved the army. I couldn't be more proud of him."
     
    Once enlisted, he was sent on three separate year-long tours to Afghanistan. It was the fulfillment of his dreams, but it came at a high price. He came under attack several times, and in one particularly serious incident incurred a blow to the head that caused traumatic brain injury. His body was so peppered with shrapnel that whenever he walked through an airport security screen he would set off the alarm.
     
    The mental costs were high too. Each time he came back from Afghanistan. between tours or on R&R, he struck his mother as a little more on edge, a little more withdrawn. He would rarely go out of the house and seemed ill at ease among civilians. "I reckon he felt he no longer belonged here," she said.
    Once, Busbee was driving Libby in his car when a nearby train sounded its horn. He was so startled by the noise that he leapt out of the vehicle, leaving it to crash into the curb. After that, he never drove farther than a couple of blocks.
     
    Nights were the worst. He had bad dreams and confessed to being scared of the dark, making Libby swear not to tell anybody. Then he took to sleeping in a closet, using a military sleeping bag tucked inside the tiny space to recreate the conditions of deployment. "I think it made him feel more comfortable," his mother said.
     
    After one especially fraught night, Libby awoke to find that he had slashed his face with a knife. Occasionally, he would allude to the distressing events that led to such extreme behaviour: there was the time that another soldier, aged 18, had been killed right beside him; and the times that he himself had killed.
     
    William told his mother: "You would hate me if you knew what I've done out there."
    "I will never hate you. You are the same person you always were," she said.
    "No, Mom," he countered. "The son you loved died over there."
    \tSoldiers' psychological damageFor William Nash, a retired Navy psychiatrist who directed the marine corps' combat stress control programme, William Busbee's expressions of torment are all too familiar. He has worked with hundreds of service members who have been grappling with suicidal thoughts, not least when he was posted to Fallujah in Iraq during the height of the fighting in 2004.
     
    He and colleagues in military psychiatry have developed the concept of "moral injury" to help understand the current wave of self-harm. He defines that as "damage to your deeply held beliefs about right and wrong. It might be caused by something that you do or fail to do, or by something that is done to you – but either way it breaks that sense of moral certainty."
     
    Contrary to widely held assumptions, it is not the fear and the terror that service members endure in the battlefield that inflicts most psychological damage, Nash has concluded, but feelings of shame and guilt related to the moral injuries they suffer. Top of the list of such injuries, by a long shot, is when one of their own people is killed.
     
    "I have heard it over and over again from marines – the most common source of anguish for them was failing to protect their 'brothers'. The significance of that is unfathomable, it's comparable to the feelings I've heard from parents who have lost a child."
     
    Incidents of "friendly fire" when US personnel are killed by mistake by their own side is another cause of terrible hurt, as is the guilt that follows the knowledge that a military action has led to the deaths of civilians, particularly women and children. Another important factor, Nash stressed, was the impact of being discharged from the military that can also instil a devastating sense of loss in those who have led a hermetically sealed life within the armed forces and suddenly find themselves excluded from it.
    <span>Busbee </span>
     
    That was certainly the case with William Busbee. In 2011, following his return to Fort Carson in Colorado after his third and last tour of Afghanistan, he made an unsuccessful attempt to kill himself. He was taken off normal duties and prescribed large quantities of psychotropic drugs which his mother believes only made his condition worse.
    Eventually he was presented with an ultimatum by the army: retire yourself out or we will discharge you on medical grounds. He felt he had no choice but to quit, as to be medically discharged would have severely dented his future job prospects.
    When he came home on 18 January 2012, a civilian once again, he was inconsolable. He told his mother: "I'm nothing now. I've been thrown away by the army."
    The suffering William Busbee went through, both inside the military and immediately after he left it, illustrates the most alarming single factor in the current suicide crisis: the growing link between multiple deployments and self-harm. Until 2012, the majority of individuals who killed themselves had seen no deployment at all. Their problems tended to relate to marital or relationship breakdown or financial or legal worries back at base.
     
    The most recent department of defense suicide report, or DODSER, covers 2011 . It shows that less than half, 47%, of all suicides involved service members who had ever been in Iraq or Afghanistan. Just one in 10 of those who died did so while posted in the war zone. Only 15% had ever experienced direct combat.
     
    The DODSER for 2012 has yet to be released, but when it is it is expected to record a sea change. For the first time, the majority of the those who killed themselves had been deployed. That's a watershed that is causing deep concern within the services.
     
    "We are starting to see the creeping up of suicides among those who have had multiple deployments," said Phillip Carter, a military expert at the defence thinktank Center for a New American Security that in 2011 published one of the most authoritative studies into the crisis . He added that though the causes of the increase were still barely understood, one important cause might be the cumulative impact of deployments – the idea that the harmful consequences of stress might build up from one tour of Afghanistan to the next.
     
    Over the past four years the Pentagon, and the US Department of Veterans Affairs, have invested considerable resources at tackling the problem. The US Department of Defense has launched a suicide prevention programme that tries to help service members to overcome the stigma towards seeking help. It has also launched an education campaign encouraging personnel to be on the look out for signs of distress among their peers under the rubric "never let our buddy fight alone".
    Despite such efforts, there is no apparent let up in the scale of the tragedy. Though President Obama has announced a draw-down of US troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014, experts warn that the crisis could last for at least a decade beyond the end of war as a result of the delayed impact of psychological damage.
     
    It's all come in any case too late for Libby Busbee. She feels that her son was let down by the army he loved so much. In her view he was pumped full of drugs but deprived of the attention and care he needed.
    William himself was so disillusioned that shortly before he died he told her that he didn't want a military funeral; he would prefer to be cremated and his ashes scattered at sea. "I don't want to be buried in my uniform – why would I want that when they threw me away when I was alive," he said.
     
    In the end, two infantrymen did stand to attention over his coffin, the flag was folded over it, and there was a gun salute as it was lowered into the ground. William Busbee was finally at rest, though for Libby Busbee the torture goes on.
     
    "I was there for his first breath, and his last," she said. "Now my daughters and me, we have to deal with what he was going through."
     
    ..

     
     
  2. It's a god damn tragedy. My heart drops each time I read about this. We have similar stories here in Norway, and I am in Denmark often, where each dead soldier in Afghanistan is written about in the newspapers, in detail.
     
    There are a lot of things to be said about warfare and our countries and their involvement in it. I don't intend to derail the topic, but I think it's interesting to provide a perspective on how our countries view soldiers, and war, differently:
     
    It's summed up very well by this comparison of recruitment commercials from respectively the United States Marines and the collected Nordic Battlegroup. (Nordic Battlegroup = Norway, Sweden, Ireland, Estonia, Finland, Latvia.) 
     
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWqT8Rljt_8 (1 min 54 s)
     
    (The Nordic BG commercial starts at 1:05)
     
  3. The simple answer is, don't enlist. Don't fight for someone else's lies and then be discarded the second you start to see how morally wrong it is.
     
    "Suppose they gavea war and nobody came?"
     
    MelT
     
  4. Note in the story above that many of the personnel committing suicide have not served on active duty.
     
     
    MelT
     
  5. This thread made me tear up
     
  6. Maybe some were 187'ed due to sensitive 411. Rest In Paradise Patt Tillman!
     
  7. #7 MelT, Aug 21, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2013
    Most of those who enlist are from poor backgrounds, who are lured into the forces with the promise of education and learning useful skills. It doesn't happen like that, and what comes back from active duty needs more than a certificate in motor maintenance to survive in the outside world. The UK and USA have happily ignored injured soldiers and done their best to avoid giving them their just dues for the service they have given. We're damn good at saluting monuments, pitiful at actually doing anything to help.
     
    MelT
     
  8. Maybe we need to stop glorifying the soldiers when they come home. Love them, but don't call them a hero for something they know is wrong.

     
  9.  
     
    Instead of training threse people like serial killing animals. Try training like a shaolin monk
     
  10. #10 3Deez, Aug 21, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2013
    I was enlisted. I dont consider myself a serial killer nor anyone else I served with. I know for a fact that we didnt do anything wrong at anytime during the combat deployments I took part in. We took an oath to serve and thats what we did and are still doing. I dont care to be hailed as a hero but I wont let anybody try to convince me that I did anything wrong....especially when Ive personally been thanked by Iraqi families and felt the relief of getting someone's brother/sister/son/daughter/mom/dad whatever, back here to them on American soil. Sure there are a few who are extreme in the way they conduct themselves but they dont account for the rest of us who did it correctly.Enlisted men and women are not mindless drones who only know kill or self destruct. Many do in fact have education and jobs after service and also pay taxes and contribute. Unfortunately many also dont. Ive lost a few friends to suicide...but Ive also lost more to alcohol related incidents.For those who appreciate what we do, I thank you. For those that dont, youre welcome anyway. People shaking my hand and thanking me for my service is more than enough for me. I feel terrible for those who fought in Vietnam only to come to disdain, redicule and homelessness.BTW, I have much respect for shaolin monks (I actually met two some years back). Their concepts are pretty interesting. Still though, I have yet to see one of them suit up in full MOPP gear in 120 degree heat and still manage to accurately put rounds on target at 600+ yards using only iron sights.
     
  11.  
     
    Really good to hear your take on all this, thanks:)
     
    MelT
     
  12. Thank you to you also for helping to get more exposure to this topic.


     
  13. You have to take into account that the nice things you've experienced in war do not override the overall negative that comes from war. We should not be over there, there isn't a good reason to be over there, thats the bottomline.

    My problem is when people say 'they have fought to defend our freedom.'
    That statement is the furthest from the truth you could get.
    The battle for freedom takes place within this country, not without.

    Also, any involvement in the military only furthers the power of our corrupt leaders. And that is why I'm strongly against anyone I care about enlisting.

    It's cool if you're happy with your experience, but don't support that notion that what you're doing has anything to do with the defense of this country.

     
  14.  
    Would you mind talking about what you think the current suicide problem might relate to?
     
    MelT
     
  15. #15 3Deez, Aug 22, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2013
    [quote name="MelT" post="18553476" timestamp="1377123490"]Would you mind talking about what you think the current suicide problem might relate to? MelT[/quote]There's little doubt about why the suicide rate has generally been this way in the military. Truth be told, there was an alarming number of suicides prior to the start anything with Iraq or Afghanistan. I personally had a good friend who shot himself after being cornered by law enforcement when he robbed a bank back in the 90s. Another friend shot himself when his father passed away and his wife left him at the same time. One of the Marines in my own charge almost killed himself when he got drunk at a party and put a gun to his own head as a joke. the round blew out the back of his skull but he lived. According to him, he didn't know that the gun was loaded. These are only a few examples but my point is that each one was an incident that could have happened involving a civilian just as easily. There are Marines that I know who suffer from mental and physical trama and do need help. Some Marines and myself got shelled one night in Iraq...for some reason I still have nightmares about that to this day...and that was back in '04. Ive never sought help because I have other problems with my body that are more chronic and the VA is pretty much useless when it comes to processing claims. I am only one of THOUSANDS. The line of people needing access to help through the VA is staggering to say the least and its back logged by years literally.   Check this out, back in 2006 time frame, my buddy's little sister was blown up by an IED in a convoy. She got a jacked arm (still functional though) and also lost an eye. Her weeks at Walter Reed were worse than being in combat (she says). The help she got was terrible to say the least. She eventually returned back to full active duty status with one glass eye (talk about a hard ass huh?). Eventually Water Reed Medical Center became the center of controversy when it was exposed but this is only one hospital out of MANY. There are a lot of service members who suffer either mild or acute service related issues because they get tired of dealing with the red tape coming from Washington. They will tell the media that there is a lot being done but then they tell us (off camera of course) that there is no budget to support the needed programs. As a result, many people just fade back into society as best they can until they gain attention by committing some act. As for budget money, this is just my opinion. We know that there are things that need funding to compensate service members however, congress says there is no money to do it. There is supposedly so little money for operational purpose within the DOD that civilians are just now going back to full work weeks after being furloughed. Truth is, furloughs are only over at this point because there can only be so many days taken away from workers within each fiscal year. As of right now, furloughs are supposed to continue if analysis shows that it helped. My question is who did it "help"? On average government employees (on the civilian side) lost anywhere from 4-6k of their annual salaries due to furlough. I know this from talking to people I currently work with both on the east and west coasts. These are not rich folk who can do without that money. Instead they are hard working people who were essentially told, "We're forcing you to take time off so we dont have to pay you and there is nothing you can do about it". Im sure that statistical data will tell a different story though. The suggestion that they (congress) absolutely LOVE to skirt though is the one involving their own furloughs to help with the problem they preach about. The fact that our country has been selling itself out to the highest bidder should tell you flat out that we don't get to pick and choose our fights. If I had my way, the amount of effort we put in other countries' defense would be put in protecting our own within the cities that need help. Put the military in a city like Chicago to help law enforcement quell gang violence and just watch how much backlash comes due to military occupancy. I personally wouldve loved to have been standing duty at the school where that shit head shot those kids. I guarentee you though that haf I been there, I might be standing trial today for blowing his face off because someone somewhere would find one of his rights that I violated. The military does little to defend American freedom because1) the administration would never let them because there's no profit to be made.2) People are afraid of it...and should be because it could get out of hand very fast. I only say this part because I notice that throughout GC there seems to be a heavy anti-military sentiment that I seriously don't get. A few weeks ago, I had a conversation with someone in another thread about the military's role in the defending freedom for American people. Im still not really sure what that guy was getting at and I back out of the conversation because I don't believe in fighting over the internet...its pointless. Fast forward to some of the things said here in this very thread (not by you).  MichaelMongrel, I do about as much to defend your freedom as you do to defend mine. I think that we can both agree on that. People want to make the military out to be the bad guys for some reason.
     
  16. Thanks very much for that, very sobering reading. I think the problem that people have with the military may be due to misunderstanding their role and equating their actions with that of the government. Politicians say go in and clean up X country, the army does so and soldiers are criticised for doing their jobs, as requested. It's pointing the finger at those on the dirty end, not those in power. Here in the UK our army does the bidding of our government whether they like it or not, and thankfully even those at the top are now saying enough is enough. We're continually being lied to about who the supposed enemy is, and it's becoming obvious that we aren't fighting for democracy and nor are we involved in a war on terror.
     
     I don't know if you would be interested, but after reading your post above, might there be a need for a continual thread here where servicemen and women get to talk about their experiences and share their thoughts about what it really means to enlist - and to come home again. We here can only gain a measured understanding of these matters from people like you, rather than government PR. Perhaps there are other ex-servicemen here whom it would help to get some of these things off their chests?
     
    Again, thanks for your detailed reply,
     
    MelT
     
  17.  
    "Just following orders" is no justification for taking part in foreign occupations.
     
  18. I'm surprised they didnt do themselves in before being deployed to the war zone.
     
    Sounds like a good song for system of a down to sing about.
     
  19. #19 donutbread, Aug 22, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2013
    Here's the truth:You enlist, you serve, you get praised when you come home, and the government sees that as a thumbs up from the American people.In other words, all this 'Thank you for making the sacrifice for our country' stuff only tells the government that nobody is worked up enough about the wars to give a shit.
     
  20. I'd rather hear about the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives destroyed than some tale of woe from a state-sponsored murderer.
     
    If you don't want to be traumatized from your stint in America's death squad, don't join it. I feel bad for their families, but no one made these people enlist.
     

Share This Page