Obama Litmus Test For Military Leaders: They Must Be Willing to Fire On US Citizens

Discussion in 'Politics' started by AirKuhl, Jan 23, 2013.

  1. Nothing you said here proves Obama is more socialist than Reagan. And Reagan didn't bring anything together. The 80's and now are two very different times with different scenarios. The division you are referring to in our country right now is much bigger than one man.
     
  2. Remember the troops won't be firing on civilians they will be firing on terrorist threats.

    Its not like there will he a mob of people against a swat team. Its going to be house raids on people the nsa decides are terror threats
     

  3. Yeah I don't think people are arguing that soldiers are going to go "Kent State" and shoot on protesters. No the Americans they fire on would be classified as domestic threats. More likely they would be doing house raids.
     

  4. Of course that's only a far-fetched scenario that is highly unlikely to ever come to fruitation. :smoke:
     
  5. In what way? They don't look alike, they don't follow the same socioeconomic philosophy, they don't follow the same religion, Obama is only liked and supported by slightly over half of the US population, Ho Chi Minh was support by about 90% of the Vietnamese people, etc... I see no similarities at all.
     
  6. Not at all. I know full well the division is the result of far more than 1 man. But as our leader, he has done nothing to bridge that gap. Every speach he makes, he pits one group against another. That's not a leader. As for as who was more socialistic, who the fuck cares? I care about what's happening NOW! Shit now I have to :smoking:
     

  7. :confused: So what does that have to do with Socialism?

    You strike me as someone that (may) listen to the speeches and only hear what you want to hear. Much like the claims of socialism with no foundation to actually demonstrate why you feel that way. One shouldn't blindly parrot others hate. :smoke:
     
  8. Oh really. Have you forgotten about the house to house gun confiscations after Katrina?
     

  9. Why are you so in love with socialism? You love Obama don't you?:wave:
     
  10. And his opponents never do the same thing. :rolleyes:
     
  11. I don't love Obama because I actually am a socialist and Obama is not.
     
  12. You didn't have to tell me that. I already knew it. Have fun. I have work to do.
     
  13. This is actually a shocker to me, since from your posts it appears you are very clueless about socialism.
     
  14. Do you even pay attention to who replies/who you reply too? You bring up false, parrotted Socialism charges and then claim that I am in love with Socialism. :rolleyes: Very trollish, or immature discussion. :smoke:
     
  15. more like 25% or so, since only half the population votes and only a little more than half of those voters voted for Obama...
     
  16. did i miss the post where you mentioned the things that Obama does that are socialist?

    you insult socialists when you call that neocon president of ours a socialist..
     
  17. But that is assuming the other 50% that doesn't vote hates Obama. That is an assumption nobody can back up. The only way we can speculate is based on the voting and on polling. Both seem to show slightly more than half have a favorable view of him. And considering the majority of people who don't vote are poor minorities, my guess is that missing 50% isn't going to be against him.
     
  18. fair enough.. but they obviously didn't like him enough to get off their ass and vote either lol..

    but i know what you're saying man..
     
  19. pretty much.

    the republicans should be in LOVE with obama right now. he's the bush that bush could never be. a neocon warmonger AND a great orator
     
  20. Good point. My guess is they probably have other matters that are far more pressing to them than voting in another asshole politician that really doesn't give a shit about them. Hell I feel that way and I'm not an extremely poor minority. :(
     

Share This Page