Login to Account Create an Account
Best Ways To Conserve Weed
#1
Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:00 PM
With smaller hits, is there a greater chance that ALL of the smoke makes contact with your lungs LONGER? If you take a huge hit, I'd guess that some of the smoke barely touches your lungs, and for a shorter amount of time.
What's the best # of seconds to inhale, between Bill Clinton-ing it and zeroing it?
I know zeroing isn't good for you, so at what point does the inhale cease to get you much higher?
Are grav's really more efficient than pipes?
I want unfiltered smoke to get more of a body stone - so bongs are out. Why do people think grav's are more efficient/get you higher than using a pipe?
#2
Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:04 PM
1. it's your preferance. i like taking more small hits.
2. hold it for like 3 or 4 seconds. don't clinton it and don't lose brain cells over a hit from holding it so long, that's dumb.
3. yeah, if you make it right. the way i described is one of plenty
Edited by Marvo Ging, 09 December 2012 - 08:06 PM.
#3
Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:07 PM
Does taking more, smaller hits get you higher?
With smaller hits, is there a greater chance that ALL of the smoke makes contact with your lungs LONGER? If you take a huge hit, I'd guess that some of the smoke barely touches your lungs, and for a shorter amount of time.
What's the best # of seconds to inhale, between Bill Clinton-ing it and zeroing it?
I know zeroing isn't good for you, so at what point does the inhale cease to get you much higher?
Are grav's really more efficient than pipes?
I want unfiltered smoke to get more of a body stone - so bongs are out. Why do people think grav's are more efficient/get you higher than using a pipe?
I would just make a good air tight gravity bong. Burns all the weed if its made right and you get ripped in 2 or 3 hits. Not a lot of weed used either.
Dont hold the smoke in for more than 10 seconds id say. I usually just breathe out when i want to
#4
Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:13 PM
#5
Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:18 PM
What am I missing?
#6
Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:18 PM
#7
Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:19 PM
#8
Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:23 PM
What I don't understand is how can burning let's say .3 grams of weed in a bowl (one hit) get you less high than .3 grams of weed in a grav (one hit)? If you hold it in the same amount of time, shouldn't they get you equally high?
What am I missing?
youd just have to see for yourself....as for me id say the gb gives a bigger hit
#9
Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:27 PM
#10
Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:30 PM
The only thing I can think of, is that you fill up your lungs as you hit a bowl...but using a grav it hits you all at once?
Even if this gets you higher, won't gravs lower your tolerance faster...thus becoming less efficient over time (because you'll need to smoke more often)?
#11
Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:34 PM
so yeah a grav hits you all at once because the smoke is forced into your lungs.
#12
Posted 09 December 2012 - 09:05 PM
a grav hit basically vaporizes the weed because of the suction on it..i dont see a pipe doing the same thing.
so yeah a grav hits you all at once because the smoke is forced into your lungs.
That is no way similar to vaporizing. GBs are straight up combustion.
#13
Posted 09 December 2012 - 09:07 PM
That is no way similar to vaporizing. GBs are straight up combustion.
I didn't literally mean vaporize. when it just burns up to nothing is what I meant
#14
Posted 09 December 2012 - 09:18 PM
I didn't literally mean vaporize. when it just burns up to nothing is what I meant
Poor word choice on a forum full of stoners.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Back to top









Sign In
Create Account