Jump to content

Welcome to Grasscity Forums - Register now for FREE
Register now to gain access to all of our features, it's FREE and only takes one minute.
Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Create an Account

Best Ways To Conserve Weed


  • Please log in to reply
 

#1
Toker.

Toker.

    Registered User

  • Registered Upgraded
  • PipPip
  • 29 posts
Does taking more, smaller hits get you higher?

With smaller hits, is there a greater chance that ALL of the smoke makes contact with your lungs LONGER? If you take a huge hit, I'd guess that some of the smoke barely touches your lungs, and for a shorter amount of time.

What's the best # of seconds to inhale, between Bill Clinton-ing it and zeroing it?

I know zeroing isn't good for you, so at what point does the inhale cease to get you much higher?

Are grav's really more efficient than pipes?

I want unfiltered smoke to get more of a body stone - so bongs are out. Why do people think grav's are more efficient/get you higher than using a pipe?

#2
Marvo Gang

Marvo Gang

    Youth vs Est.

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 884 posts
if you make a small bowlpiece for your grav it will conserve your bud & get you blasted. I'm talking a metal bowl mouthpiece jammed into a cap. a plastic one, or a cork for a glass bottle, whatever you can make., a plastic coca cola cap and plastic bottle is the simplest way. make a gram last longer.
1. it's your preferance. i like taking more small hits.
2. hold it for like 3 or 4 seconds. don't clinton it and don't lose brain cells over a hit from holding it so long, that's dumb.
3. yeah, if you make it right. the way i described is one of plenty

Edited by Marvo Ging, 09 December 2012 - 08:06 PM.


#3
skuzzy420

skuzzy420

    Chef/Food Scientist

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 266 posts

Does taking more, smaller hits get you higher?

With smaller hits, is there a greater chance that ALL of the smoke makes contact with your lungs LONGER? If you take a huge hit, I'd guess that some of the smoke barely touches your lungs, and for a shorter amount of time.

What's the best # of seconds to inhale, between Bill Clinton-ing it and zeroing it?

I know zeroing isn't good for you, so at what point does the inhale cease to get you much higher?

Are grav's really more efficient than pipes?

I want unfiltered smoke to get more of a body stone - so bongs are out. Why do people think grav's are more efficient/get you higher than using a pipe?




I would just make a good air tight gravity bong. Burns all the weed if its made right and you get ripped in 2 or 3 hits. Not a lot of weed used either.

Dont hold the smoke in for more than 10 seconds id say. I usually just breathe out when i want to

#4
StateofReverie

StateofReverie

    T.I.P. BALLER STATUS

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 1,025 posts
If you take smaller hits the weed will be burning for a longer duration

#5
Toker.

Toker.

    Registered User

  • Registered Upgraded
  • PipPip
  • 29 posts
What I don't understand is how can burning let's say .3 grams of weed in a bowl (one hit) get you less high than .3 grams of weed in a grav (one hit)? If you hold it in the same amount of time, shouldn't they get you equally high?

What am I missing?

#6
jizzledfreq

jizzledfreq

    Professional Enthusiast

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 2,539 posts
I'm going to start using my metal cigarette one hitter (it's actually 2-3) and just take a hit and draw the smoke deep into my lungs. I'm also going to start smoking at night time only. I noticed if I smoke all day everyday, my stash goes hella fast.

#7
skuzzy420

skuzzy420

    Chef/Food Scientist

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 266 posts
this is what I got

Attached Thumbnails

  • image-1538607174.jpg


#8
skuzzy420

skuzzy420

    Chef/Food Scientist

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 266 posts

What I don't understand is how can burning let's say .3 grams of weed in a bowl (one hit) get you less high than .3 grams of weed in a grav (one hit)? If you hold it in the same amount of time, shouldn't they get you equally high?

What am I missing?





youd just have to see for yourself....as for me id say the gb gives a bigger hit

#9
Marvo Gang

Marvo Gang

    Youth vs Est.

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 884 posts
agreed just gotta try it gets everyone really baked

#10
Toker.

Toker.

    Registered User

  • Registered Upgraded
  • PipPip
  • 29 posts
Is it possible to get varying amounts of smoke from the same amount of weed?

The only thing I can think of, is that you fill up your lungs as you hit a bowl...but using a grav it hits you all at once?

Even if this gets you higher, won't gravs lower your tolerance faster...thus becoming less efficient over time (because you'll need to smoke more often)?

#11
skuzzy420

skuzzy420

    Chef/Food Scientist

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 266 posts
a grav hit basically vaporizes the weed because of the suction on it..i dont see a pipe doing the same thing.

so yeah a grav hits you all at once because the smoke is forced into your lungs.

#12
Ihazabp

Ihazabp

    Registered User

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 126 posts

a grav hit basically vaporizes the weed because of the suction on it..i dont see a pipe doing the same thing.

so yeah a grav hits you all at once because the smoke is forced into your lungs.


That is no way similar to vaporizing. GBs are straight up combustion.

#13
skuzzy420

skuzzy420

    Chef/Food Scientist

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 266 posts

That is no way similar to vaporizing. GBs are straight up combustion.


I didn't literally mean vaporize. when it just burns up to nothing is what I meant

#14
Ihazabp

Ihazabp

    Registered User

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 126 posts

I didn't literally mean vaporize. when it just burns up to nothing is what I meant


Poor word choice on a forum full of stoners. :P
  • Emblazened likes this




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users