This is good news
Login to Account Create an Account
Fed court to review Marijuana drug status, first time in 20 years
#1
Posted 09 October 2012 - 03:23 AM
#2
Posted 09 October 2012 - 03:43 AM
#3
Posted 09 October 2012 - 03:49 AM
For now, I remain skeptical..
#4
Posted 09 October 2012 - 04:51 AM
#5
Posted 09 October 2012 - 05:12 AM
Remember its like overturning a call in football, there must be sufficent evidence to do so.
#6
Posted 09 October 2012 - 05:49 AM
#7
Posted 09 October 2012 - 05:53 AM
fuck the government
Those whores? I wouldn't....not even with your dick dude....not even for a second. haha
#8
Posted 09 October 2012 - 12:21 PM
#9
Posted 09 October 2012 - 03:33 PM
I wouldn't count on it, they are going to look for solid studies conducted by highly regarded institutions, or possibly only government institutions. There are none, don't tell me there are because there are not any that have been conducted well-enough to be taken seriously. If it happens of course it will be pleasant surprise, but I would bet against it.
Remember its like overturning a call in football, there must be sufficent evidence to do so.
Actually there are tons of solid studies, even government studies that say pot is harmless. Your "there are none dont tell me there are" attitude is quite funny.
http://forum.grassci...g-oct-16th.html
That is a thread about what is going to happen oct 16 with audio of the people who will be speaking and what they are going to be speaking about.
#10
Posted 09 October 2012 - 05:53 PM
I wouldn't count on it, they are going to look for solid studies conducted by highly regarded institutions, or possibly only government institutions. There are none, don't tell me there are because there are not any that have been conducted well-enough to be taken seriously. If it happens of course it will be pleasant surprise, but I would bet against it.
Remember its like overturning a call in football, there must be sufficent evidence to do so.
Ever hear of the Shafer commision ????? Pretty sure you have your facts a bit twisted or your minds shut too tightly to our past history...
#11
Posted 09 October 2012 - 08:31 PM
#12
Posted 09 October 2012 - 10:32 PM
#13
Posted 09 October 2012 - 10:46 PM
#14
Posted 09 October 2012 - 10:53 PM
#15
Posted 09 October 2012 - 11:02 PM
Since its the federal government, I'm not holding my breath.
#16
Posted 09 October 2012 - 11:49 PM
I wouldn't count on it, they are going to look for solid studies conducted by highly regarded institutions, or possibly only government institutions. There are none, don't tell me there are because there are not any that have been conducted well-enough to be taken seriously.
I understand what you are saying, but I beg to differ:
?Gold Standard? Studies Show That Inhaled Marijuana Is Medically Safe And Effective | NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform
There are not too many "gold standard" studies on inhaled whole plant cannabis, but they do exist. Besides:
Medical Cannabis: Voices from the Frontlines » Blog Archive » Medical Prescribers Launch National Letter for Medical CannabisThere are many medically accepted uses of drugs for indications that have not undergone Phase III level testing. For example, take the use of platelet-rich plasma (PrP) injections for the treatment of Achillies tendonitis or tennis elbow.
Actually there are tons of solid studies, even government studies that say pot is harmless. Your "there are none dont tell me there are" attitude is quite funny.
I think what EasternSmoker was referring to was FDA approved studies showing inhaled whole plant cannabis as effective for treatment of specific medical conditions, NOT just that cannabis is safe.
Ever hear of the Shafer commision ????? Pretty sure you have your facts a bit twisted or your minds shut too tightly to our past history...
The Shafer commission's report was not a medical study. It did not prove that cannabis is effective for treating any medical conditions.
Ha! Someone here on GC called this about a week ago. It's a Democrat push to kick the stoners into gear for voting season. Nothing will be declassified, nothing will be decriminalised, the best you can hope for is MJ being reduced to a Sch 2.
Nothing to do with democrats or the election. The suit was filed by ASA, which has been working on getting cannabis rescheduled for years. And getting cannabis moved to Schedule II would be a tremendous benefit.
#17
Posted 09 October 2012 - 11:51 PM
They are arguing about rescheduling it. The best that could result from this is legalization as a recreational substance
HUH?
That would require removing it from all schedules, not rescheduling it.
#18
Posted 09 October 2012 - 11:55 PM
#19
Posted 09 October 2012 - 11:59 PM
Too bad the media will black out the entire thing like it never happened.
#20
Posted 10 October 2012 - 12:05 AM
This whole hearing should be played on at least 5 TV networks non-stop.
Too bad the media will black out the entire thing like it never happened.
I'm like 30 miles away...I'm going to take a day off work and see if I can get in to watch the hearing. If I can, I'll try to take some notes and report back.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Back to top








Sign In
Create Account