The whole thing conflicts with medical marijuana. Its like they gonna say something like "its already legal for medical use so why not legalize oxycontin for recreational use too" or "how much further loose should this get with all these pot shops everywhere". If something is legal only for sick people, it doesnt really sound right to just say lets legalize it for everyone. Its as if legalizing it for recreational use cheapens or makes real medical patients somehow worthless. They couldnt even get something like this passed in California 2 years ago. As liberal as California is, even the voters there didnt want to legalize marijuana. Maybe the drug legalizers should try getting something like this in British Columbia on a ballot there. There simply isnt enough support for legalizing drugs.
What do you think? Yes or No?
Edited by Vollont, 22 July 2012 - 02:36 AM.