Jump to content

Welcome to Grasscity Forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account
Photo

The World's Not Going to End, It's going to Change.

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

#1
D M z

D M z

    Banned

  • Banned by Moderators
  • 712 posts
The world's not going to end, Armageddon is bullshit.

The masses also thought that the world was going to end in year 2000 but they misunderstood that change just like they are misinterpreting the 2012 change.
Why did they misunderstand the change? figure it out.

The year 2000, By the 1970's, it was becoming increasingly clear that the population of Europe and White America was rapidly declining while the 3rd world nations were expanding. Somehow, the gap between western populations and 3rd world population had to be abridged to restore Western (masonic) supremacy on a global scale. In the 1970's, President Jimmy Carter commissioned the Global 2000 report. The findings of the report blamed virtually all of the world's problems on the population growth of non-­white people. The report went on as far as recommending elimination of at least 2 billion people in 3rd world nations off the face of the earth by the year 2000 in order to restore Western supremacy.

The year 2012 is the beginning of the Freemason's fall, because their power is slowly being figured out by the masses. Our whole perception of the world will change before our eyes, because there are so many truths suppressed right now.

Those truths can only be held from the people for so long before we all become aware of what is going on, it's only a matter of time.

#2
welker 420

welker 420

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • 3,260 posts
im so sick of 2012 threads

#3
D M z

D M z

    Banned

  • Banned by Moderators
  • 712 posts
you're going to be pretty sick of 2012 then brother.

#4
welker 420

welker 420

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • 3,260 posts
can i punch you in the face when nothing even happens

#5
D M z

D M z

    Banned

  • Banned by Moderators
  • 712 posts
it's already happening and progressing. You just don't want to see it.
move on if you don't believe.

#6
ICGreen

ICGreen

    Actively Green

  • Registered
  • 10,846 posts
The Y2K was not about the World ending, it was about the chaos that could happen if the computers weren't fixed/programmed to read a 4 digit year. :smoke:

#7
jimbobbybob

jimbobbybob

    third eye is open

  • Registered
  • 1,654 posts
Time wave zero? <-------- I hope this theory is correct...hope

#8
D M z

D M z

    Banned

  • Banned by Moderators
  • 712 posts
hopefully someone thinks hard about that bold quote and researches into it. get aware of whats good.
haha cause the majority have no clue at all

and us stoners are a good majority
time to smoke a bowl.

#9
welker 420

welker 420

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • 3,260 posts

it's already happening and progressing. You just don't want to see it.
move on if you don't believe.

oh ya? hows that? shits always been changing.

#10
Tle

Tle

    Banned

  • Banned by Moderators
  • 2,399 posts

oh ya? hows that? shits always been changing.


im with you, this 2012 bullshit is ridiculous and just dumb, nothings is going to happen and if something was it would have already happend there buddy, its about time to move on and find another theroy to make into a dam conspericy world ending fuckness

#11
coalition17

coalition17

    Sharp Dressed Man

  • Registered
  • 1,260 posts
Kill whitey!

#12
Buzzwell420

Buzzwell420

    reefer brain

  • Registered
  • 7,943 posts
i am some what familiar with this shit.


whos taking there place

or is it power to the people.

because sometimes i cant tell whos winning

#13
Cruizer

Cruizer

    Wizard of Aus

  • Registered
  • 3,738 posts

The Y2K was not about the World ending, it was about the chaos that could happen if the computers weren't fixed/programmed to read a 4 digit year. :smoke:


1999 isn't a four digit year?

Edit: From what I thought it was that years were only programmed with the last two digits of the four digit year number. So 1983 was '83' and 1902 was '02' (I know computers weren't around then). Therefore in the year 2000 it would read '00' and the computers would have a fit and just stop working, 'thinking' time had stopped or some other nonsense.

So people said "Why don't they just change it to four digits?" Which idiots replied "It's so hardwired into all the computers that a complete overhaul of the yearly date would be impossible"

Then everyone went crazy.

Edited by Cruizer, 01 July 2012 - 07:52 AM.


#14
megamax42

megamax42

    ....

  • Registered
  • 1,428 posts
I believe it was about the abbreviated 2 digits and rolling over to a third.

#15
OscarZetaAcosta

OscarZetaAcosta

    The Truth

  • Gold Member
  • 9,370 posts

1999 isn't a four digit year?

Edit: From what I thought it was that years were only programmed with the last two digits of the four digit year number. So 1983 was '83' and 1902 was '02' (I know computers weren't around then). Therefore in the year 2000 it would read '00' and the computers would have a fit and just stop working, 'thinking' time had stopped or some other nonsense.

So people said "Why don't they just change it to four digits?" Which idiots replied "It's so hardwired into all the computers that a complete overhaul of the yearly date would be impossible"

Then everyone went crazy.


Very few computers were affected or even thought to be vulnerable to the changing date...It did however affect a few machines in the world, unknown if it was due to programming or simple user-error though.

Either way, the world has always been changing...This is the same thing they say every time one of their "End of all" theories goes up in smoke, "Well, we meant 'Change.'" Yeah, alright...There will probably not be any great change comin' in 2012 because it would seem a good portion of the population does not know how to make the choice to change.

We'll do this dance again in 20 years, I promise, and the world will be vastly different than it is now.:cool:

#16
Rerun

Rerun

    Foggy windows, soggy indo

  • Registered
  • 4,680 posts
We'll see, won't we.
Just live your life the way you think is best as a whole.

#17
davewinz

davewinz

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
the changes sure are starting to resemble something along the lines of a global government taking over. What with europe being taken over by fascist banks, and the us dollar disintegrating :smoke:

Edited by davewinz, 01 July 2012 - 02:27 PM.


#18
Cruizer

Cruizer

    Wizard of Aus

  • Registered
  • 3,738 posts
I think the only reason a man-made change would come on the 21st December 2012 would be because it's a self-fulfilling prophecy.

"We'll name a random date really far in the future, when people see it they'll make plans for the day thinking it has some kind of significance, then we'll be right." - Mayans

#19
Thekidthatshigh

Thekidthatshigh

    Banned

  • Banned by Moderators
  • 737 posts

The Y2K was not about the World ending, it was about the chaos that could happen if the computers weren't fixed/programmed to read a 4 digit year. :smoke:


It was already a 4 digit year dood

#20
bruhlazer

bruhlazer

    Jix

  • Registered
  • 1,262 posts

I think the only reason a man-made change would come on the 21st December 2012 would be because it's a self-fulfilling prophecy.

"We'll name a random date really far in the future, when people see it they'll make plans for the day thinking it has some kind of significance, then we'll be right." - Mayans


All they predicted was a new "cycle" not even the end of the world. It is highly possible humans destroy the world before 2012 out of fear though




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users