Login to Account Create an Account
Making cheap cars for expensive car looks
#1
Posted 21 April 2012 - 04:23 AM
#2
Posted 21 April 2012 - 08:40 PM
but maybe? I personally wouldn't want a wantabe Lamborghini with a weak ass engine...
but for the economic person maybe it would work out? Hybrid Lambo?
Haha!
#3
Posted 21 April 2012 - 09:00 PM
I know I would never pay just for the looks of a car, thats stupid.
People pay for performance.
Also, companies own the rights to how their cars look, so they would have to be th ones producing it and if they did, they would get knocked on by the whole car community for making shoddy cars.
#4
Posted 21 April 2012 - 09:00 PM
#5
Posted 21 April 2012 - 09:02 PM
#6
Posted 21 April 2012 - 09:03 PM
#7
Posted 21 April 2012 - 09:23 PM
I'm sure they could fit a shell of a lambo on all types of cars, but if the car/engine underneath is still week who would want it? It would be like a joke.
#8
Posted 21 April 2012 - 09:29 PM

#9
Posted 22 April 2012 - 12:28 AM
But notice how every supercar has a certain look to it? You can just tell it's a supercar and rediculously expensive just by looking at it. They should make a car that looks like a supercar that is affordable, but not just rediculously expensive.
Maybe my first thought of $22,000 was too low. Maybe less that $50,000 though, I think that's a reasonable price.
The only cars I've seen with the sporty style that are not a ridiculous price are as follows: 350z,370z, Hyundai Tiburon, Mitsubishi Eclipse, Ford Mustang, Toyota Celica, Mitsubishi 3000GT, Chevy Camaro, Mazda RX8, and a few other 90's cars I can't think of right now. Oh yeah and the Lotus Exige, which looks fantastic and is affordable for around $50,000. But that's the only one I can really think of that could fit my answer.
If you can think of anything else feel free to add to the list.
Edited by ddd3, 22 April 2012 - 12:31 AM.
#10
Posted 22 April 2012 - 12:32 AM
If wanna be a cheap bastard then your gonna drive a cheap bastard car.
cars aren't cheap to engineer or test.... i mean there is more then just the cost of materials when manufactures set a car price.
Wouldn't car companies make so much more money this way?
common sense now, dont you think a car company.... A BUSINESS, would wanna make more money, they obviously know what they're doing and are doing what works....
which car would you want?
this:
[ame][/ame]
or this:
[ame][/ame]
Edited by Hydroriffic, 22 April 2012 - 12:34 AM.
#11
Posted 22 April 2012 - 12:32 AM
#12
Posted 22 April 2012 - 12:34 AM
#13
Posted 22 April 2012 - 01:08 AM
That shit is expensive.Well it doesn't have to be a "weak" engine perse. They could still fit in a v6 or a v8. But what makes a car turn heads on the street isn't just the loud exhuast, it's the way it looks. Tinted windows, nice rims, paint job, side skirts, spoilers/wings. These are the things that make people say "that's a nice" car.
But notice how every supercar has a certain look to it? You can just tell it's a supercar and rediculously expensive just by looking at it. They should make a car that looks like a supercar that is affordable, but not just rediculously expensive.
Maybe my first thought of $22,000 was too low. Maybe less that $50,000 though, I think that's a reasonable price.
The only cars I've seen with the sporty style that are not a ridiculous price are as follows: 350z,370z, Hyundai Tiburon, Mitsubishi Eclipse, Ford Mustang, Toyota Celica, Mitsubishi 3000GT, Chevy Camaro, Mazda RX8, and a few other 90's cars I can't think of right now. Oh yeah and the Lotus Exige, which looks fantastic and is affordable for around $50,000. But that's the only one I can really think of that could fit my answer.
If you can think of anything else feel free to add to the list.
#14
Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:23 AM
That shit is expensive.
It is, but still shouldn't exceed $100,000 dollars, or match up to the price of a supercar.
#15
Posted 22 April 2012 - 11:28 PM
It is, but still shouldn't exceed $100,000 dollars, or match up to the price of a supercar.
it wouldnt be a "supercar" then, itd just be a sportscar and they already do this.....
you named off like 10 cars and still wonder why they do make cheap cars for expensive car looks, What more do want?
A supercar imo can reach speeds close to 200mph+, i wouldnt base the meaning of a supercar on its "expensive looks", expensive looks is just a byproduct of millions of $'s of Research in the wind tunnel. Otherwise they'd be giving cars away for less then they cost to produce.
if you haven't figured it out by now, go read a book or something.
#16
Posted 23 April 2012 - 12:11 AM
#17
Posted 23 April 2012 - 12:24 AM
#18
Posted 23 April 2012 - 05:53 AM
#19
Posted 23 April 2012 - 05:59 AM
Plus, this is already happening. Look at hyundai and kia, trying to copy merc/bmw/rolls/bentleys etc.
#20
Posted 29 April 2012 - 12:11 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Back to top










Sign In
Create Account