Jump to content

Welcome to Grasscity Forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account
Photo

Male cop searches underage girl ALONE in School Bathroom

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1
tharedhead

tharedhead

    Southern Gothic

  • Bronze Member
  • 8,881 posts
Press reports it like this
Parent protests AHS drug search - The Daily Astorian: Free

If you put a pot leaf on your phone, we get to see your underwear;)

#2
I RoLL Fatties

I RoLL Fatties

    Canadian homegrown daank

  • Registered
  • 2,535 posts
:rolleyes: ;)

:smoking:

Attached Files



#3
Klauck

Klauck

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • 752 posts
I like that pic I Roll Fatties, I kinda wanna get it tattooed.. Where did you find it? Is it yours?

#4
I RoLL Fatties

I RoLL Fatties

    Canadian homegrown daank

  • Registered
  • 2,535 posts

I like that pic I Roll Fatties, I kinda wanna get it tattooed.. Where did you find it? Is it yours?



It's not mine, but it does look cool. :P Forgot where I found it. :smoke:

#5
HeaDiEs RusH

HeaDiEs RusH

    All Good 2011

  • Registered
  • 827 posts
This story doesn't focus on whether or not the girl should have been searched in the bathroom. In fact, it doesn't even mention marijuana so I really don't see how this is relevant.

#6
Laith

Laith

    Banned

  • Banned by Moderators
  • 2,621 posts

This story doesn't focus on whether or not the girl should have been searched in the bathroom. In fact, it doesn't even mention marijuana so I really don't see how this is relevant.

It mentions that she did not have any drugs on her, and the cop did not even ask the parents for their consent for this search.

He pretty much chose a random girl, said he had probable cause because of a marijuana leaf sticker on her cellphone (which her friends could have placed there), follows her into a bathroom, and feels her up for "drugs" that she did not have.

That seems a little more like molestation + abuse of power than a search.

#7
xdog

xdog

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • 1,771 posts
I have to agree with Headies. Kind of felt sucked into reading it and then it just kind of digressed away and never discussed the details of or reason for the search.

#8
xdog

xdog

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • 1,771 posts

It mentions that she did not have any drugs on her, and the cop did not even ask the parents for their consent for this search.

He pretty much chose a random girl, said he had probable cause because of a marijuana leaf sticker on her cellphone (which her friends could have placed there), follows her into a bathroom, and feels her up for "drugs" that she did not have.

That seems a little more like molestation + abuse of power than a search.

Molestation? Was that mentioned?

#9
HeaDiEs RusH

HeaDiEs RusH

    All Good 2011

  • Registered
  • 827 posts

It mentions that she did not have any drugs on her, and the cop did not even ask the parents for their consent for this search.

He pretty much chose a random girl, said he had probable cause because of a marijuana leaf sticker on her cellphone (which her friends could have placed there), follows her into a bathroom, and feels her up for "drugs" that she did not have.

That seems a little more like molestation + abuse of power than a search.


Where did you read anything about a marijuana sticker?

#10
Laith

Laith

    Banned

  • Banned by Moderators
  • 2,621 posts

Molestation? Was that mentioned?

No, just my personal opinion. He could have waited outside of the girl's washroom, rather than following her inside. That is just very un-professional, and there's no telling what happened inside because of the lack of cameras, which only makes it worse.

Where did you read anything about a marijuana sticker?

I had read a comment from someone who mentioned that was their reason for suspicion. Not sure if it's true. I mean, considering no drugs were found on her, and their policy is that they will alert parents before any police action, no matter what the suspicion was - it could have been handled properly instead of like this.

#11
As Above So Below

As Above So Below

    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄

  • Registered
  • 3,796 posts
I guess no one is alarmed that male officers can search minors in the bathroom alone? So much could have went wrong. Police are not saints and I know there are hundreds of cops out there who would have done harm to this girl, sexually or not.

#12
tharedhead

tharedhead

    Southern Gothic

  • Bronze Member
  • 8,881 posts

This story doesn't focus on whether or not the girl should have been searched in the bathroom. In fact, it doesn't even mention marijuana so I really don't see how this is relevant.



She had a pot leaf on her phone (the newspaper article manages to leave out most of the facts:( but some of them made it to the comments) . I seriously question the immediate danger that was threatening the school due to this. :confused:
The article was incredibly lame, and obfuscating as the school is apparently CYA
Doctors can't examine an underage patient without a nurse present.


The officer can always transfer to corrections....

Sex abuser trailed vacationing Lake Oswego family to get access to girl | OregonLive.com

Sorenson, a former juvenile corrections officer, and the girl met online. Using a website that allows two-way video chats, their conversations and behavior went from friendly bantering to sexually explicit displays. Then they met in person -- Sorenson, who lives in Dallas, Ore., would drive to Lake Oswego -- and began having sex.


Edited by tharedhead, 21 March 2012 - 09:04 PM.


#13
xdog

xdog

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • 1,771 posts
Is there rebuttals to the article allowed or a comments section in that particular newspaper?

#14
Buttery

Buttery

    hi dair

  • Registered
  • 1,023 posts
That is an extremely poorly written article lol... no facts and they kinda randomly tried to connect it to sex abuse. -1 for journalism

#15
Froop

Froop

    Logic Prevails!

  • Registered
  • 314 posts

Hoppes said that because 10 to 12 students from AHS will travel outside the country, heading to Walldorf, Germany, the school board must approve. The vote was unanimous. That trip occurs over spring break.


Wait, what?

#16
travilanche

travilanche

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • 2,372 posts
Because smoking pot is far more harmful to a young girl, than getting felt up by a strange man in his 30's for no reason.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users