Login to Account Create an Account
Male cop searches underage girl ALONE in School Bathroom
#1
Posted 21 March 2012 - 03:06 AM
Parent protests AHS drug search - The Daily Astorian: Free
If you put a pot leaf on your phone, we get to see your underwear;)
#2
Posted 21 March 2012 - 03:09 AM
#3
Posted 21 March 2012 - 03:29 AM
#4
Posted 21 March 2012 - 04:04 AM
I like that pic I Roll Fatties, I kinda wanna get it tattooed.. Where did you find it? Is it yours?
It's not mine, but it does look cool.
#5
Posted 21 March 2012 - 01:49 PM
#6
Posted 21 March 2012 - 03:06 PM
It mentions that she did not have any drugs on her, and the cop did not even ask the parents for their consent for this search.This story doesn't focus on whether or not the girl should have been searched in the bathroom. In fact, it doesn't even mention marijuana so I really don't see how this is relevant.
He pretty much chose a random girl, said he had probable cause because of a marijuana leaf sticker on her cellphone (which her friends could have placed there), follows her into a bathroom, and feels her up for "drugs" that she did not have.
That seems a little more like molestation + abuse of power than a search.
#7
Posted 21 March 2012 - 03:09 PM
#8
Posted 21 March 2012 - 03:14 PM
Molestation? Was that mentioned?It mentions that she did not have any drugs on her, and the cop did not even ask the parents for their consent for this search.
He pretty much chose a random girl, said he had probable cause because of a marijuana leaf sticker on her cellphone (which her friends could have placed there), follows her into a bathroom, and feels her up for "drugs" that she did not have.
That seems a little more like molestation + abuse of power than a search.
#9
Posted 21 March 2012 - 03:48 PM
It mentions that she did not have any drugs on her, and the cop did not even ask the parents for their consent for this search.
He pretty much chose a random girl, said he had probable cause because of a marijuana leaf sticker on her cellphone (which her friends could have placed there), follows her into a bathroom, and feels her up for "drugs" that she did not have.
That seems a little more like molestation + abuse of power than a search.
Where did you read anything about a marijuana sticker?
#10
Posted 21 March 2012 - 07:52 PM
No, just my personal opinion. He could have waited outside of the girl's washroom, rather than following her inside. That is just very un-professional, and there's no telling what happened inside because of the lack of cameras, which only makes it worse.Molestation? Was that mentioned?
I had read a comment from someone who mentioned that was their reason for suspicion. Not sure if it's true. I mean, considering no drugs were found on her, and their policy is that they will alert parents before any police action, no matter what the suspicion was - it could have been handled properly instead of like this.Where did you read anything about a marijuana sticker?
#11
Posted 21 March 2012 - 08:11 PM
#12
Posted 21 March 2012 - 09:00 PM
This story doesn't focus on whether or not the girl should have been searched in the bathroom. In fact, it doesn't even mention marijuana so I really don't see how this is relevant.
She had a pot leaf on her phone (the newspaper article manages to leave out most of the facts:( but some of them made it to the comments) . I seriously question the immediate danger that was threatening the school due to this.
The article was incredibly lame, and obfuscating as the school is apparently CYA
Doctors can't examine an underage patient without a nurse present.
The officer can always transfer to corrections....
Sex abuser trailed vacationing Lake Oswego family to get access to girl | OregonLive.com
Sorenson, a former juvenile corrections officer, and the girl met online. Using a website that allows two-way video chats, their conversations and behavior went from friendly bantering to sexually explicit displays. Then they met in person -- Sorenson, who lives in Dallas, Ore., would drive to Lake Oswego -- and began having sex.
Edited by tharedhead, 21 March 2012 - 09:04 PM.
#13
Posted 21 March 2012 - 09:36 PM
#14
Posted 22 March 2012 - 12:44 AM
#15
Posted 22 March 2012 - 03:53 PM
Hoppes said that because 10 to 12 students from AHS will travel outside the country, heading to Walldorf, Germany, the school board must approve. The vote was unanimous. That trip occurs over spring break.
Wait, what?
#16
Posted 22 March 2012 - 04:26 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Back to top









Sign In
Create Account