blunts burn slower then joints

[GrandaddyPurps]

Is it just in experience or isnt true that blunts burn slower than joints?

[WalkeR.]

depends on the blunt wraps you use. I've used grape phillies before and they burn pretty slow. I guess it depends on how dry the bud you use is too

[elproducto]

yeah blunts burn a lot slower. i've had dutches and games that have burned for like 35 minutes

[godsthirdnut]

how long they burn has nearlly no relation to how high they get you, i'm fucking sick of people making these kind of statements. the plant matter burns and enters your lungs, just because it burns at a slower rate does in no way mean theres more THC getting to your lungs. also people tend to hit joints and blunts differently just because one burns slower in no way makes it more effective, although it can make for a more enjoyable session.

in fact the bong, one of the fastest burners in use, is also prized as being the most effective.

i know some people will argue with this and if you can do it with some valid logic i will give you mad props.

[strictlyheadies]

think about it, blunts are moist, fat, made of tobacco, so yea they probably do burn slower

[strictlyheadies]

Originally Posted by godsthirdnut

how long they burn has nearlly no relation to how high they get you, i'm fucking sick of people making these kind of statements. the plant matter burns and enters your lungs, just because it burns at a slower rate does in no way mean theres more THC getting to your lungs. also people tend to hit joints and blunts differently just because one burns slower in no way makes it more effective, although it can make for a more enjoyable session.

in fact the bong, one of the fastest burners in use, is also prized as being the most effective.

i know some people will argue with this and if you can do it with some valid logic i will give you mad props.

he wasnt asking wat gets you more stoned just wat burns slower, chill man

[nemsist221]

i always thought it depended on how tight it was rolled

[elproducto]

Originally Posted by godsthirdnut

how long they burn has nearlly no relation to how high they get you, i'm fucking sick of people making these kind of statements. the plant matter burns and enters your lungs, just because it burns at a slower rate does in no way mean theres more THC getting to your lungs. also people tend to hit joints and blunts differently just because one burns slower in no way makes it more effective, although it can make for a more enjoyable session.

in fact the bong, one of the fastest burners in use, is also prized as being the most effective.

i know some people will argue with this and if you can do it with some valid logic i will give you mad props.

there's more excess smoke that isn't being inhaled if it's loose. the weed in a bong burns fast but all the smoke gets sucked up into a tube, when a blunt or joint burns fast you lose a lot of smoke when you're not inhaling.

[RedBullGotWings]

ya so... it deff has alot of different variables on how slow you can make a blunt burn. but over all yes bluts are a lot thicker then joints.. bunts burn slower...
but you can roll a shitty bunlt that burns faster. but thats all your fault.