Why you sometimes get higher off of mids than dank.

[BlazinPhoenix]

My theory, anyway.


Imagine, if you will, a weed-scale. From 1 to 10, 10 being best.
Schwag is ranked a 2
Mids are ranked a 4.
And Dank is ranked a 6. (or higher, but for demonstration purposes we'll use 6.)

What i'm thinking is that your body develops resistances to other stuff than thc (that might get you high, or allow the thc to get you higher.) Once your body has built a significant amount of resistance to THC (and the other dankity chemicals), the smoker smokes some mids. The mids would have a greater effect on the person than dank because his body hasn't built up these resistances to the other chemicals that we're inhaling, so it allows you to get alot higher.


So basically, your body would (with enough tolerance) bring dank down to a 3, because you're developing a resistance to all the other chemicals. You're not used to the mids chemicals, though, so the mids stays at a 4. Therefore dank would be less of a great idea to smoke, and mids you'd be better off with.

Does that make sense to anyone else?

[liquidswords]

cool theory and all, but have you actually tested it? I dont think it'd be true if you actually tried it

[BlazinPhoenix]

Well, you always hear people saying 'man i got SUPER blazed off this brick before, that shits still tight' so it would make sense. Plus if there's different potencies the chemical balance of the plant itself would be off (more x to accomodate to more y) and the high would be different.

[FuglyFungus]

It makes sense and all but hat are these "other" chemicals? I didn't know mids had different chemicals besides THC that got you high or I just cant read.

[The Lex]

dude on a scale of 1 to 10 how high are you?

you kinda described what makes the weed schwag, mids or dank: the level of THC in it. i think maybe it could be that you smoke say a lot fo indica and then suddenly get some sativa and them being different it seems higher and shit.

[BlazinPhoenix]

that made me laugh my ass off, but i'm probably an 8, i just smoked a dank/kief/dank/kief layered bowl, and it knocked me off my ass. on a scale from 1 to 10 for sleepiness i'm probably gonna be a 10. But yours makes sense too. And there are more chemicals that induce highs in weed, so the chemical balances would shift, is the theory.

[pbmike15]

Weed is weed. Dank just has more of the good stuff.

[Mr. bojangles]

I think you might be on to something Blazin Phoenix

[windowPanes]

Originally Posted by BlazinPhoenix

My theory, anyway.


Imagine, if you will, a weed-scale. From 1 to 10, 10 being best.
Schwag is ranked a 2
Mids are ranked a 4.
And Dank is ranked a 6. (or higher, but for demonstration purposes we'll use 6.)

What i'm thinking is that your body develops resistances to other stuff than thc (that might get you high, or allow the thc to get you higher.) Once your body has built a significant amount of resistance to THC (and the other dankity chemicals), the smoker smokes some mids. The mids would have a greater effect on the person than dank because his body hasn't built up these resistances to the other chemicals that we're inhaling, so it allows you to get alot higher.


So basically, your body would (with enough tolerance) bring dank down to a 3, because you're developing a resistance to all the other chemicals. You're not used to the mids chemicals, though, so the mids stays at a 4. Therefore dank would be less of a great idea to smoke, and mids you'd be better off with.

Does that make sense to anyone else?

Yeah man I think about this all the time. I've tried it and personally have found mids to be better, pricewise and smokewise, got me noticably higher than dank. More bang for your buck in my opinion.

I used to smoke nothing but dank, then my mom (yes, my mother), introduced me to her friend. She smoked me up with some high mids which had me Blazed after a nice bowl, while the dank would've taken 2-3 bowls depending if I topped it with kief. Now I get O's of this shit for 140-160(usually a couple g's over) , and these are Great mids too, the most seeds that ever came from one of her bags was 14, and they were even goood seeds, its "child" was definately heady. The grower it comes from keeps about half of the female plants for himself, but I always find danker nugs in the bag that obviously came from a better plant. Different look too sometimes, but I have NO complaints

[tylerc]

The difference between mids and dank is overrated.

I'm getting a quarter of some seedless mids/beasters tomorrow for $50, supposed to be real legit smoke.

[bss]

I think that makes sense. I normally by half o's and ive found that when i get some new stuff i usually get higher than ive been getting even if the new stuff isnt any better than the last.

[stonerboywonder]

all i know is that i smoked a couple blunts of the dankest in my area every day last week then saturday i smoked a blunt of mids and i didnt feel a thing.