Eat Vs. Smoke

[keystone08]

I would call myself an experienced toker but i have never eaten. i am going to a red sox game and i want to toke before it but i am not looking to get a rrested so i planned to eat or make firecrackers. that brings me to my questions, if i was to eat it, how much less effective is it than smoking it. is it enough to eat a gram of headies to get you stoned?

[quasimoto]

Yeah a gram will have you good for the whole game.

I prefer smoking, but I will make brownies/firecrackers from time to time.

[jimmoman]

i like smoking better but a g should be good, i dono if it was just my weed but da firecrackers gave me a really heavy buzz, not intense or anything but just lik sleepy n heavy

[syntax13]

Eating is actually far more effective, you are able to absorb nearly 100% of the THC rather than the usual 60% from smoking. Also when you digest it it turns into delta-11-thc rather than delta-9 which is far more psychoactive and has a longer duration.

So yeah, a gram of dank in a firecracker will probably have you absolutely fucked for more than the game, you might even wanna make like a couple half grams ones and eat them one at a time cause cooking with thc is very potent.

[wak]

Originally Posted by syntax13

Eating is actually far more effective, you are able to absorb nearly 100% of the THC rather than the usual 60% from smoking. Also when you digest it it turns into delta-11-thc rather than delta-9 which is far more psychoactive and has a longer duration.

So yeah, a gram of dank in a firecracker will probably have you absolutely fucked for more than the game, you might even wanna make like a couple half grams ones and eat them one at a time cause cooking with thc is very potent.

nah i saw a post today that said the oposit. aprently its less efective.

[Thrill]

Originally Posted by wak

nah i saw a post today that said the oposit. aprently its less efective.

i heard it was more effective to eat, then to smoke. like, it lasts longer.

[zidave05]

I've heard that too

[quasimoto]

When I eat weed it lasts like 6-8 hours and when I start getting high I feel a little high.. then it gets more and more and more intense as the night/day goes on.. I still prefer smoking though because it is almost instant effects and I just like smoking weed lol..

[bluetoke547]

Lets just agree that no matter what it gets us all high? lol. Why would you get arrested if you smoked before? You would be high either way and there is nothing they can do to you if your caught high. Maybe give you an "intoxicated in public" or something but I really dont think they can legally do anything.

[willie_the_pimp]

I've found eating to be a totally different high... Cookies get you more body stoned and it takes a lot longer to kick in, but its a great trip.

[sensimil]

Originally Posted by keystone08

I would call myself an experienced toker but i have never eaten. i am going to a red sox game and i want to toke before it but i am not looking to get a rrested so i planned to eat or make firecrackers. that brings me to my questions, if i was to eat it, how much less effective is it than smoking it. is it enough to eat a gram of headies to get you stoned?

A gram should do it~It certainly is more of an intense/body high, and bring your sunglasses-you eyes are going to look like you are BLAZED TO THE BONE (heh, sort of reflecting how you are going to be feeling)
Personally, I dont like trying new things in a big public event, but thats just me, Id rather seek the comfort of my home. If you have the chance, you might want to become 100% comfortable with cooking, the amount, the trip, etc before trekkin into the unknown, but whatever you choose, have fun, im sure you will firecrackers are a blast.