this is a continuation of a thread that got deleted for being in the wrong section. here you go now please prove these wrong which you apparently could so easily do but have not yet. oh and he's not trying to legalize weed, merely leave it up to the individual states which means it will still be illegal in most places for medical use and almost everywhere if not everywhere for recreational use.
i didnt make the chart, and i agree it does list things multiple times to make the list longer. like allowing discrimination falls into the women/gay/civil rights. but i have still yet to see anyone prove these wrong at all.
yeah and? thats not what this is about... this is about the cons list. in the other thread there were people so eager to say that the list was full of lies yet not once did they link a source or have any sort of proof.
that cons list is pretty big, but that pros list is pretty powerful. my opinion of Ron Paul is therefore unchanged. bite me.
quality varies whether it public or private. some good teachers only want that private stash, some public teachers are saints to do what they do. most of em treat it as a paycheck. no one is gonna stop teaching the kids unless you as citizen vote for it, ok.
would you eat a ham sandwich covered in dog shit because you like ham? and the pro's of what he wants to do most likely wont happen anyway because of the congress and senate... however the republicans would be all over his con list.
Give me a little while I am about to hop in the shower and then I'll get to this before I head out for the night. I do appreciate you making a new thread rather than cluttering the Appreciation thread.
now i will say that paul isnt bad as far as republicans go but you have to realize anything that he does want to do that congress doesnt agree with wont happen. he wont be elected and shit just happens. and i can almost guarantee you that the pro list will most likely not happen but a lot of the stuff in his con list might stand a chance which is bad.
Not gonna let you get away that easy. I expect you to explain in great detail why each of the cons accusations are a bad thing. And if you had any knowledge of ron Paul then you'd already know most of those cons are too funny. Being an anti Ron Paul guy, have you had the curiosity to spend quite a few hours watching all of ron Paul's interviews and speeches? I have because I'm interested but would someone like you? I know damn well I don't watch any of romneys Gingrich or Perry's videos. They say enough in the debates and in their past.
All of those cons are pros. Except: Promote Creationism over Evolution and the others that are written in a way that just slander instead of address the principle of the issue. And they're not even true. It's you're ignorance to economics that blinds you.
“Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. society can have a government, that government can be a democracy, just cause bastiat is upset don't mean he and impose his will on a majority. the majority want to feed the poor and pay taxes to do so. i, ron paul, believe that those taxes should not go to waste.
RON PAUL "PLAN TO RESTORE AMERICA"Â |Â Ron Paul 2012 Presidential Campaign Committee This is what he says he'll do. That poster is just hyperbolic bullshit. Half of it is false.