In the recent debate, Ron Paul was asked who would pay for a 30 year old who has no insurance and in bad health (coma), and as the blood-thirsty tea-bagger, white trash audience cheer for the man to die. Ron Paul says a simple "no" but that "no" turns into a yes when he gives an awful answer, believing charity is the only way that he will get help. This guy has no compassion, he would let a fellow American die because he is poor? Outrageous! Not to mention he is a racist and a creationist. Ron Paul also looked like a little kid in a over sized jacket, it made me laugh. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJqlqZ13qeE]Ron Paul's Health Insurance Alternative - YouTube[/ame]
Huh? ...trolling? this is a real thread, with real opinions. You can't say anyone who hates ron paul is a troll. nice try though.
You can interpret his response in anyway you want. People will always skew it to what they want to hear. I for one liked his answer. And for some reason The Young Turks show annoys me. I'm not sure why it just rubs me the wrong way.
You sure you're not a child posting on an adults account? The problem is with your comprehension of his answer. Firstly, Ron Paul has saved more lives then you could ever hope to affect. Secondly, you have to understand that you, as an American, work until August for government costs. That's more than half of your income going to programs through taxes that you seem to believe are going to a more efficient system than the private sector could provide. You make the assumption that medicare and medicaid actually result in a better quality and efficiency of healthcare and this is where we disagree (and believe me, I'm a Canadian!). Now, even ignoring all this waste and the fact that under a Paul government you'd be able to keep a huge chunk more of your income you still worry about the people who would be stupid enough to not buy some sort of security for their health, right? Well, why doesn't enough charity exist for them now? How has Obama's healthcare plan affected existing charities? So there, my response had cohesive concepts and no name calling or unsubstantiated claims as you desperately resorted to. The fact that you called the one candidate standing up for INDIVIDUAL liberties a racist is a whole 'nother bag of your ignorance, sir. Cheers!
I'm having trouble believing you can understand English. Also, that douche on TYT is retarded. Probably about the same level as you in terms of overall knowledge & intelligence though.
So what happens when charity does not work for his 100,000 dollar health bill? In the world of Ron Paul, he would die. People have a hard time with critical thinking, seems that way for a lot of libertarians.
Hank Moody is a socialist, anti-paul troll who was previously banned. I'm sure the title 'banned' will soon grace his SN again. /thread
the hospital does the work, the dude stiffs the hospital and the taxpayers pay the bill.. this happens all the time. Why do you think medical care is so damn expensive? hospitals can't just let people die if they need care. That's not how it works.. and again.. ron paul never said "yes" so i am right and you are wrong.. as usual.
What happens when the government doesnt have 100,000 dollars to pay the healthbill? How can the government have 100,000 dollars when we are 14 trillion in debt?
The American Bar Association is a private licensing agency, which is exactly what Ron Paul is advocating.