Grasscity.com - the best counter-culture community


Go Back   Grasscity.com Forums > CHILL OUT ZONE > Pandora's Box
Message Boards and Forums Directory


Pandora's Box This forum is for discussion of various topics that might be controversial for some members. If you don't want to play with Pandora, don't come to the Box. (Administration reserves the right to remove any threads and/or posts.)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2007, 02:26 AM
kid with the chemicals
sodomizedjello's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the forest
Posts: 1,591
An authoritarian ideal: drug control is social control

i thought this was interesting

http://www.cleartest.com/testinfo/social_control.htm

Fear and hate are the cornerstones of the war on drugs. We are taught to hate drug users and fear that we are too weak to resist the power of drugs. Prohibitionists harness negative emotions about drugs to create an elaborate system of social control. As we have seen, any atrocity can be justified by the drug war. However, we generally just imagine the atrocities could never happen to us, since our fear has kept us away from illegal drugs. The fear has been so expertly promoted that many Americans have been willing to forego certain constitutional rights and civil liberties, while simultaneously ceding more power to government officials and other drug war profiteers. The institutions trying to control the masses also recognize the utility of the drug war as social control. Since drug use frequently does not show outwardly, the drug war is an excuse to invade the private life of the individual. Everyone is a suspect. In order to see who really is and who really isn't a drug user, surveillance is necessary. Urinalysis in the workplace is an excellent example. Drug testing is sold as a safety procedure, but is really quite a bit more. Not only is it a process which demeans the employee while demonstrating the great power of the employer, drug testing gives the employer a glimpse into the employee's medical life, and the process asserts the employer's right to regulate behavior outside the workplace. Drug fear offers employers a broad justification to exert additional control over their employees. As we have seen, the additional control offered to government is even more invasive and overwhelming.
The drug war offers a slippery slope over which to slide into a completely authoritarian, surveillance-based police state. Drug war propaganda insists that individuals are too weak to control drug use. As criticism builds over the failure of drug policies, law enforcement officials claim they can't do the job either; instead each individual and institution is obliged to spy on their fellow citizens.

By zeroing in on the weakness of individuals, drug warriors highlight the need for themselves and other drug war institutions. If we can't control ourselves, what can we do? Pay someone else to control us, and give them whatever weapons they need, constitutional or not.

Ironically, the drug war also reinforces the idea that individuals are solely responsible for the problems of society. The drug war tells us that when we approach the problem of workplace safety, all that really matters is the types of drugs used by individual workers, not the condition of the workplace or its regulations.59 The drug war tells us inner cities are deteriorating because of drugs, not because of poverty and neglect.60 The propaganda of the drug war constantly reinforces the idea that drug users should be punished for their sins, not helped with their problems.61

Ultimately, the drug war exploits many of our personal weaknesses, and makes them open for pillage by some of the strongest institutions in society. If we continue to support the war blindly, it can only continue to balloon out of control. Drug war logic interprets signs of "drug problem" improvement as the vindication of getting tough; signs of failure are interpreted as a failure to get tough. Even though many recognize that this war can't be won, those promoting the war offer nothing but further escalation.

Fortunately, some brave individuals have stood up against this devastating crusade.

59. Gilliom, John (1996). Surveillance, Privacy and the Law, pp. 43-51. Hit "Back" button to return to text.

60. Reinarman et al, (1997). Crack in America, pp. 37-39. Hit "Back" button to return to text.

61. To see how the Partnership for a Drug Free America promotes this ideology, see Buchanan, et al (Spring, 1998). "This is the Partnership for a Drug-Free America: Any Questions?" Journal of Drug Issues p. 346. Hit "Back" button to return to text. If this title is out of print at retailers, you may want to search Powell's Books.


Source:

"Maximizing Harm: Losers and Winners
in the Drug War," http://www.maximizingharm.com/
Author: Stephen Young
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by cocoa
we erowidulated that shit.
questions? erowidulate that shit.

prying open my third eye

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2007, 04:09 AM
anarkin is offline  
anarkin has been heard by manyanarkin has been heard by manyanarkin has been heard by manyanarkin has been heard by manyanarkin has been heard by manyanarkin has been heard by manyanarkin has been heard by manyanarkin has been heard by many
anarkin
I
anarkin's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,183
I'll admit, I didn't read the whole thing. But I must agree that drug control is a form of social control. Call me paranoid, but it seems that alot of things going on are just little ways to take a little more freedom away, slowly bringing us closer to a police state.
__________________
They say you are what you eat, so I strive to eat healthy
My goal in life is not to be rich or wealthy
Cause true wealth comes good health and wise ways
We got to start taking better care of our selves.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 09:54 PM
bohemian
Maitereya's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,128
we need to get some fucking weapons and organize.
__________________
Barack Obama stating that he would try to make Comcast's filtering of BitTorrent illegal. - wikipedia
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bulk of Illicit Club Drug Concocted in Netherland superjoint General Marijuana News from around the World 5 02-12-2009 06:43 AM
US IL: Civil Liberties Cast Aside in Overzealous Drug War Truth-Seeker General Marijuana News from around the World 5 11-06-2008 12:17 AM
European Drug Laws and Policies...listed by country. ReformMaryJaneLaws Legalization and Activism 2 05-23-2007 07:54 PM
History of the DEA - Know thy Enemy. Durchii General 0 01-12-2007 07:37 PM
California Senate Votes to Bar Random Drug Tests in Schools ReformMaryJaneLaws General Marijuana News from around the World 0 05-29-2004 08:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 AM.

© Copyright 1999-2009
Grasscity.Com
All rights reserved.


SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.