|
|
||||||
| Pandora's Box Discussion of various topics-- if you don't want to play with Pandora, don't come to the Box. Administration reserves the right to remove any threads and/or posts. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
it's IN YOU.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Knowledge, as wisdom, has value only when shared.
Posts: 1,488
|
in 200hundred years, americas has achieved
mass genocide, then slavery, then freedom, then the american dream, and now:
slavery, of a new kind... +++++++++ Brave New Era for Privacy Fight By Kim Zetter Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,66242,00.html 02:00 AM Jan. 13, 2005 PT As the nation prepares for President Bush's inauguration next week, privacy activists on both sides of the political spectrum are bracing for a White House push to augment controversial domestic surveillance powers gained under the Patriot Act and other legislation passed since 9/11. "The administration has made it clear that they do intend to continue their move to dramatically reduce privacy and constitutional protection for our citizens," said former Republican congressman Bob Barr, who now works as a speaker and consultant to organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union. But surveillance legislation isn't the only concern on the minds of privacy advocates. They're also looking at technologies and services coming out of the commercial sector that could seriously affect civil liberties. Some of the important issues to watch this year are: Patriot Act enhancements In his state-of-the-union speech last year, Bush urged ongress to renew certain provisions of the Patriot Act that are set to expire at the end of this year. Barr and other civil liberties advocates expect that the administration, believing it has a mandate to gain the powers it wants, will also try to push through new Patriot Act II provisions, which the administration partly abandoned when their existence came to light and caused an uproar in 2003. Barr expects the administration will pass provisions piecemeal in other legislation to avoid controversy, as it did last year with the Anti-Terrorism Intelligence Tools Improvement Act of 2003, or HR3179. "This will be a crucial battle over the coming two years to see whether Congress really will stand up for the privacy rights of our citizens," Barr said. "The record so far has not been terribly optimistic." One possible reason for optimism could be the SAFE Act, introduced in 2003, which Barr sees as a sign that some members of Congress regretted passing the Patriot Act with insufficient checks and balances. The Security and Freedom Ensured Act of 2003, or SB1709, is a bipartisan bill that refines some of the more invasive provisions of the Patriot Act regarding wiretaps, library records and other types of surveillance. The bill has 19 co-sponsors but has been frozen in the Senate for more than a year. A House companion bill (HR3352) has also been stuck. Data mining The corporate sector has increasingly been collaborating with government agencies in data-mining projects that whittle away individual liberties. Privacy advocates say this will be the most important issue to watch this year. Although laws prohibit the government from building dossiers on individuals, they don't prohibit the government from buying information from commercial data aggregators like Acxiom, ChoicePoint and LexisNexis, which collect information about citizens' web surfing, bank transactions, doctor visits and travel itineraries. And there are no laws governing how federal agencies can use the data. The concern cuts both ways, however. Privacy advocates say there are currently few safeguards governing how private corporations can use information passed to them by government authorities. For example, the Fleet Bank in Boston closed the financial accounts of several customers after law enforcement made inquiries about the customers' transactions in the course of a terrorist investigation. Although authorities never found any reason to charge the customers with a crime, the bank closed their accounts anyway. Kim Taipale, executive director of the Center for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology Policy, said that monitoring and battling such corporate/government partnerships takes a concerted effort that has, until now, been lacking. "When the public spotlight is on it, it creates a lot of concern and attracts a lot of attention, but the battle is getting the public spotlight to shine on these plans," Taipale said. European and Latin American countries are also looking to establish privacy safeguards for data collected by U.S. companies on foreign consumers. According to Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, U.S. commercial data aggregators have collected information on Latin American consumers and dropped it into border-patrol databases to help officials determine who should be allowed entry to the United States. "This data from property records and DMV and voter-registration records in those countries should not be going to the U.S. for these purposes," Rotenberg said. "The flow of information around the world will be a very big issue this year." National ID Another important issue is the adoption last month of what could become a de facto national ID card. Even though Congress previously nixed a proposal for a national ID card on grounds that it would be too intrusive and prone to abuse, a driver's license provision in the National Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Act, passed before Congress' holiday recess, requires all driver's licenses to be standardized to include machine-readable, encoded data by the end of 2006. Although the legislation didn't specify what data would be encoded in the cards, it gave authority to the secretary of transportation, in consultation with the Homeland Security secretary, to define the data within 18 months. Privacy advocates are concerned that rather than just preventing ID fraud, the data on cards could be linked to a national database containing dossiers of information gathered from other sources. Robert Ellis Smith, publisher of the Privacy Journal, has said the new law "will have more serious consequences for individual liberties of American citizens than any other law enacted in at least two decades." Privacy legislation and states' rights Privacy advocates expect ongoing battles between the federal government and states over jurisdiction in privacy matters. California experienced such a scuffle when Congress, bowing to pressure from business lobbyists, passed a law in 2003 that undid a California privacy regulation. The state law would have let bank and brokerage customers prevent financial institutions from sharing their personal information -- such as bank balances, credit card purchases and stock holdings -- with affiliate companies. California has been a leader in passing privacy legislation, but Rotenberg says the state's moves have made a lot of people inside and outside of corporate boardrooms uncomfortable. "There's a lot of nervousness in Washington about California's willingness to create privacy laws," Rotenberg said, "and I think you may see some effort to use federal authority to reign in states." DNA databases Although Californians have high regard for privacy, this regard didn't extend to criminal suspects last November when residents approved one of the most aggressive DNA measures in the country, which privacy advocates say will likely be copied nationwide. The DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocence Protection Act allows authorities to take DNA samples from anyone -- adult or juvenile -- convicted of a felony. Currently, it also lets police collect samples from any adult arrested for specific felonies, such as sexual assault and murder, even before they are convicted. But in 2009, that authority will expand to allow police to collect DNA samples from any suspect arrested for any felony -- including nonviolent crimes like residential burglary -- whether or not the person is charged or convicted. It's expected that genetic data for 1 million people -- including innocent suspects -- will be added to California's DNA databank by 2009, making it the largest state DNA databank in the country. "Not long ago, people said we would only collect for felony convictions of sex crimes where there is a high level of concern about recidivism," Rotenberg said. "Now it's dramatically expanded to non-sex crimes and even misdemeanors. I can now imagine the world of perfect DNA matching that (the film) Gattaca depicted." RFID tags Radio-frequency ID tags will become a bigger issue in 2005 as their use expands into new areas. Currently, stores and companies embed RFID tags in the packaging of drugs and commercial products to help track product supplies and update orders. But privacy advocates say the tags will soon be embedded in clothing and other products, raising concerns that the tracking might not stop when consumers leave a store with the product. "The problem is not only about tracking the whereabouts of people but about linking associations," Rotenberg said. "Students with RFID student cards can be grouped and monitored in terms of who they're with." Chips embedded beneath the skin will also become a larger issue. Last October, the FDA approved an implantable computer chip that would contain medical information to assist with health care. The military has discussed implanting the chips in soldiers to speed up medical care, and Rotenberg said it's likely the chips will soon be used in prisoners, parolees and eventually children. The concern is with forced chipping, which would take away choice from individuals receiving the chips. Rotenberg expects 2005 to be a busy year for privacy advocates. But he hopes that individuals won't leave it to organized activists to do all the work to protect privacy rights or think that because a specific right doesn't pertain to them that it's OK for others to lose it. "It's a mistake to think that privacy is an individualist or atavist right," Rotenberg said. "I really view privacy as a collective right. When someone else is forced to give up their privacy, yours could be the next to go." ++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++ I stand against these ciolations, and am actively informinn all people around me about these risks. it is our duty, as people whom understand the danger, to inform others. please note that it is not the technology that is negative, it is the fact that it can be used against freedom and the search for happyness we all thrive for. Gri, scared.
__________________
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="256"><td><center><br><br><br>There is a single truth<br>that unites and trenscands all humans:<br><br>our fundamental desire is<br>to be happy.<br><br><br></td></center> </table> |
|
|
|
Crack baby
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pirate Lair, Wa
Posts: 98
|
Democracy does'nt work. I'm suprised this country's lasted this long. The roman empire lasted extremely long, and so far we've made it about 200 + years and it's already the most divided country on earth.
__________________
"Oh man, I am so high right now..I have no idea what's goin on" - Towelie www.mattr0x.com <--
|
|
|
|
Crack baby
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pirate Lair, Wa
Posts: 98
|
I'm actually more republican leaning. Communism is truly terrible and I definitely don't support it in any way, I just said this country is very divided as a result of our "freedoms".
__________________
"Oh man, I am so high right now..I have no idea what's goin on" - Towelie www.mattr0x.com <--
|
|
|
|
it's IN YOU.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Knowledge, as wisdom, has value only when shared.
Posts: 1,488
|
Quote:
don't you see, how must i spell it to ya all.... wake up.
__________________
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="256"><td><center><br><br><br>There is a single truth<br>that unites and trenscands all humans:<br><br>our fundamental desire is<br>to be happy.<br><br><br></td></center> </table> |
|
|
||
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: So Cali
Posts: 989
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
it's IN YOU.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Knowledge, as wisdom, has value only when shared.
Posts: 1,488
|
this so wrong in my opinion.
to flee away or to deny the facts is most certainly not an option. not anymore. we (as in us, those whom just want to be happy) must step up and have our voices heard. this system we have put in place doesn't /seem to/ work, granted. but it /can/ all we need is to focus on real atteinable goals: health freedom happyness. global economy could be used to attein such goals, but right now, it's goal is to make the rich get richer. may it be in the us or outside. That's what's wrong. we have (as in we, those among us whom just want happyness) to let go of our thirst for money or power, we have plenty of proofs that it doesn't lead to happyness. I just wanna love ya all, i wanna care for ya, i wanna help you atteind happyness; i sure know it's possible. but first, i gotta pay my taxes. how insane can that be ? we HAVE TO CHANGE.
__________________
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="256"><td><center><br><br><br>There is a single truth<br>that unites and trenscands all humans:<br><br>our fundamental desire is<br>to be happy.<br><br><br></td></center> </table> |
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 1,813
|
The EU will beat us down to toilet.
CIA gives grim warning on European prospects
NICHOLAS CHRISTIAN THE CIA has predicted that the European Union will break-up within 15 years unless it radically reforms its ailing welfare systems. The report by the intelligence agency, which forecasts how the world will look in 2020, warns that Europe could be dragged into economic decline by its ageing population. It also predicts the end of Nato and post-1945 military alliances. In a devastating indictment of EU economic prospects, the report warns: "The current EU welfare state is unsustainable and the lack of any economic revitalisation could lead to the splintering or, at worst, disintegration of the EU, undermining its ambitions to play a heavyweight international role." It adds that the EU’s economic growth rate is dragged down by Germany and its restrictive labour laws. Reforms there - and in France and Italy to lesser extents - remain key to whether the EU as a whole can break out of its "slow-growth pattern". Reflecting growing fears in the US that the pain of any proper reform would be too much to bear, the report adds that the experts it consulted "are dubious that the present political leadership is prepared to make even this partial break, believing a looming budgetary crisis in the next five years would be the more likely trigger for reform". The EU is also set for a looming demographic crisis because of a drop in birth rates and increased longevity, with devastating economic consequences. The report says: "Either European countries adapt their workforces, reform their social welfare, education and tax systems, and accommodate growing immigrant populations [chiefly from Muslim countries] or they face a period of protracted economic stasis." As a result of the increased immigration needed, the report predicts that Europe’s Muslim population is set to increase from around 13% today to between 22% and 37% of the population by 2025, potentially triggering tensions. The report predicts that America’s relationships with Europe will be "dramatically altered" over the next 15 years, in a move away from post-Second World War institutions. Nato could disappear and be replaced by increased EU action. "The EU, rather than Nato, will increasingly become the primary institution for Europe, and the role Europeans shape for themselves on the world stage is most likely to be projected through it," the report adds. "Whether the EU will develop an army is an open question." Defence spending by individual European countries, including the UK, France, and Germany, is likely to fall further behind China and other countries over the next 15 years. Collectively these countries will outspend all others except the US and possibly China. The expected next technological revolution will involve the convergence of nano, bio, information and materials technology and will further bolster China and India’s prospects, the study predicts. Both countries are investing in basic research in these fields and are well placed to be leaders. But whereas the US will retain its overall lead, the report warns "Europe risks slipping behind Asia in some of these technologies". For Europe, an increasing preference for natural gas may reinforce regional relationships, such as those with Russia or North Africa, given the inter-dependence of pipeline delivery, the report argues. But this means the EU will have to deal with Russia, which the report also warns "faces a severe demographic crisis resulting from low birth rates, poor medical care and a potentially explosive Aids situation". Russia also borders an "unstable region" in the Caucasus and Central Asia, "the effects of which - Muslim extremism, terrorism and endemic conflict - are likely to continue spilling over into Russia". The report also largely en dorses forecasts that by 2020 China’s gross domestic product will exceed that of individual western economic powers except for the US. India’s GDP will have overtaken or be overtaking European economies. Because of the sheer size of China’s and India’s populations their standard of living need not approach European and western levels to become important economic powers. The economies of other developing countries, such as Brazil, could surpass all but the largest European countries by 2020. Delivery formats for "Scotsman.com News" Can anyone tell me what great things France has brought to the world in the last 200 years? Keep focusing on our negatives so your dont have to think about your own. Democracy doesnt work. That is why our forefathers made us a republic, not a democracy. If everyone has 1 vote, then think about how many ill-informed, non informed people you have making decisions for you. People go and vote and dont even know what they are voting for. This will not be a popular statement, but we need to have some more limits or something on voting. People who dont pay taxes, people with 0 stock in this country vote on decisions to better themselves at the cost of the taxpayers. Last edited by Gilligan; 01-16-2005 at 10:44 PM. |
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Aux Arcs
Posts: 2,371
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|||
|
it's IN YOU.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Knowledge, as wisdom, has value only when shared.
Posts: 1,488
|
Quote:
YOU ARE TIREING, Gillian. YES FRANCE IS AS SHITTY AS THE US OR ANY OTHER COUNTRY. there i said it. now, can we f***ing move on and be constructive. Quote:
they are OUR misktakes, as a whole community called humanity. Quote:
Quote:
*TO BETTER THEMSELVES* when is it that people in power will start to work for their citizens... when is it that people will start fighting for other's freedom, or health, or happyness. I am fighting for the right to freedom of americans, and i'm french. (ergo this thread as an exemple) I am not fighting against something or someone. I am fighting FOR someone, anyone, everyone. because i am part of everyone; one my own, i'm nobody, and so are you, Gilligan. ( imho, of course ^__^ )
__________________
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="256"><td><center><br><br><br>There is a single truth<br>that unites and trenscands all humans:<br><br>our fundamental desire is<br>to be happy.<br><br><br></td></center> </table> Last edited by Gri77oN; 01-17-2005 at 06:39 PM. Reason: name spelling *SORRY* |
||||
|
|||||
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 1,813
|
could you atleast attempt to spell my name right when addressing me?
The same un you gave a speech to against iraq, is that the same UN that is so currupt from the top on down to the bottom? The same un France sold their vote to iraq in? You talk about us being slaves, who are we slaves to? I would say socialist programs, ones you love, your country impliments, the ones ruining your economy, enslave the population. Slavery is working without proper compensation. Working so the govt can steal your money is slavery. Maybe your should butt out of our lives, our slavery, and try to do something about your own. But that is against the French policy isnt it. You are good at pointing out problems, even giving your solutions, although very seldom asked for them, but its hard to listen to them when they are comming from a place where the government enslaves the entire population. Off topic, i noticed in another post you said you meditate 80% of the time your awake, does that mean you meditate at work or do you not have a job? Heres a good example of how democracy sucks. We are a nation of a majority christian population. If the majority rules, the christians could basicly do what the hell they wanted. Ban other religions, Ban books, ban anything, do anything,. This is why democracy sucks. You talk about bettering themselves, but the selfish people better themselvs at the cost of the workers. They have no reguard for anyone but themselves. Fight for your own fucking freedoms in your own fucking country! Heres someone who has the nad to stand up for the enslaved people in your country. Vote Sarkozy in 07! End sociaist, enslaved, anti-jew and anti-american France.!!!!!! socailsm is slavery!!!! Moreso than anyt slavery you think we have here. ACT goddamnit!!! Happy 1,000 post to me, i couldnt ask for a better topic for it to be under. Fucking ACT!!!!!!! Free yoursevles, then help us. You telling me to act is like a monk telling me about sex. |
|
|
|
it's IN YOU.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Knowledge, as wisdom, has value only when shared.
Posts: 1,488
|
Quote:
yes of course, my applogies. it's just that ... don't ask me how but i never even /saw/ the 2nd g until you pointed it out to me. I'm sorry but i can tell that this i due to the way I pronounce your name in my head, i pronouce it gillian, becoz it sounds like grillon .... sorry mate. now onto you post..
__________________
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="256"><td><center><br><br><br>There is a single truth<br>that unites and trenscands all humans:<br><br>our fundamental desire is<br>to be happy.<br><br><br></td></center> </table> |
|
|
||