Conspiricies Theorys

[burnttwaffle]

i was inspired to make this by Tea.Mochi,thanx for the idea, lets hope it worx


I wanted to make this to discuss any and all conspiracy theory's,


i want to keep this from being closed or deleted, and prevent bands from it

so

no matter what happens, no flaming disrespect and basically keep in mind the rules of GC posted EVERYWHERE.


First post gets to pick a theory, and we can stick on that until GC basically decides we are done discussing it

Lets all try and play nice here

[Tical00]

How about the conspiracy of god?

[Tical00]

Just kidding, there are already too many topics on that.
Anyone believe that what the bush administration is telling us about 9/11 is true? Or does anyone think something else is behind it.

Please, no facts from Fahrenheit 911 though.

[burnttwaffle]

i am not really up to date on that stuff, care to inform me, id like take part in this discussion

[CaptainLavender]

yess i love all this kind of stuff!! i dont think bush was directly responsible for 9/11 but i def think he knew it was goin to happen and was in on it in some way.

anyone seen the movie zeitgeist, if you havent you should watch it, its a sick moviee!

[Tray Dub]

No, I really doubt he was in on it. Did he suck at dealing with terrorism? Yeah. He was warned by the Clinton people that Bin Laden was by far his greatest threat and he instead focused on the star wars missile defense bullshit. But I have a hard time he knew about and wanted 9/11 to happen. Oh, and Loose Change is just a piece of shit. So don't bring that up.

[burnttwaffle]

well iv been doing some reading

and i really think bush didnt know it was going to happen

however.... he is still a dumass and handled everything wrong IMHO

[Cali Ounces]

i think there is so much fodder on both sides its quite difficult to form a logical legitimate opinion about 9/11.

so let me just put up more questions. . .

who stood to profit off of 9/11?
who stood to lose?

was the building really capable of handling the impact? many people say it was, and that the collapse was inhibited by unknown forces.

is the fact that the idea that our own government would commit such an act so outrageous that they knew we'd never buy that and end up blaming the USA? especially with such a perfect scapegoat . . .

[Tray Dub]

Originally Posted by Cali Ounces

i think there is so much fodder on both sides its quite difficult to form a logical legitimate opinion about 9/11.

so let me just put up more questions. . .

who stood to profit off of 9/11?
who stood to lose?

was the building really capable of handling the impact? many people say it was, and that the collapse was inhibited by unknown forces.

is the fact that the idea that our own government would commit such an act so outrageous that they knew we'd never buy that and end up blaming the USA? especially with such a perfect scapegoat . . .

The answers to your questions are:

-Terrorists, companies that profit from wars, politicians
-Americans, anyone of Arab descent
-No, it wasn't. I could go into great detail about how the crash/fire weakened the building to a point of vulnerability, but I don't really want to. Do some research for yourself. But it's completely possible that those towers could've been knocked just by a couple planes
-Maybe. But containing a conspiracy that big is damn near impossible. If the white house can't even keep a blowjob secret, I doubt they could've kept their murder of 3000+ Americans in broad daylight secret.

[Cali Ounces]

Originally Posted by Tray Dub

The answers to your questions are:

-Terrorists, companies that profit from wars, politicians
-Americans, anyone of Arab descent
-No, it wasn't. I could go into great detail about how the crash/fire weakened the building to a point of vulnerability, but I don't really want to. Do some research for yourself. But it's completely possible that those towers could've been knocked just by a couple planes
-Maybe. But containing a conspiracy that big is damn near impossible. If the white house can't even keep a blowjob secret, I doubt they could've kept their murder of 3000+ Americans in broad daylight secret.

not to doubt the legitamacy,
but can you extrapolate on point number one?

[Tray Dub]

Originally Posted by Cali Ounces

not to doubt the legitamacy,
but can you extrapolate on point number one?

Yeppers. Terrorists, well there recruiting has exploded (no pun intended) with the wars. It's just common sense. Any time a country is occupied, its citizens resent the occupants. We've pissed off a lot of Arabs, and a lot of them are going to grow up to at least sympathize with the terrorists if not actually become one. Companies that profit from wars because a major attack on us almost always leads to a war. Politicians because big attacks make the country want to find a leader, and they almost always find one in the politicians. Before Pearl Harbor, FDR couldn't get the country to go to war (I'm not an expert on WWII, so don't crucify me if I'm getting this wrong). Afterwards, he had the support he needed. After 9/11, the entire country fell in love with W and Guiliani (sic). It gave W the political capital he needed to take us to war with Iraq, which is what he wanted all along.

PS I'm not saying FDR was responsible whatsoever for Pearl Harbor

[Cali Ounces]

Originally Posted by Tray Dub

Yeppers. Terrorists, well there recruiting has exploded (no pun intended) with the wars. It's just common sense. Any time a country is occupied, its citizens resent the occupants. We've pissed off a lot of Arabs, and a lot of them are going to grow up to at least sympathize with the terrorists if not actually become one. Companies that profit from wars because a major attack on us almost always leads to a war. Politicians because big attacks make the country want to find a leader, and they almost always find one in the politicians. Before Pearl Harbor, FDR couldn't get the country to go to war (I'm not an expert on WWII, so don't crucify me if I'm getting this wrong). Afterwards, he had the support he needed. After 9/11, the entire country fell in love with W and Guiliani (sic). It gave W the political capital he needed to take us to war with Iraq, which is what he wanted all along.

PS I'm not saying FDR was responsible whatsoever for Pearl Harbor

no doubt,

9/11 provided an awesome oppurtunity for bush to put more of his ideals and political goals into action

[Tray Dub]

^Truth. But motive does not mean guilt.

[burnttwaffle]

so have you fellows come to a conclusion at all?

[Bluntzilla420]

The oil crisis. Why are politicians not doing SHIT to help? Hmm........