Grasscity.com - world's best online headshop


Go Back   Grasscity.com Forums > CHILL OUT ZONE > Pandora's Box
Message Boards and Forums Directory

Pandora's Box Discussion of various topics-- if you don't want to play with Pandora, don't come to the Box. Administration reserves the right to remove any threads and/or posts.

View Poll Results: Is the U.S. Government keeping secrets from the people about 9/11?
yes 48 87.27%
no 11 20.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 06:38 AM
Voodoo
labyrinth's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Labyrinth
Posts: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by METHOD_MAN View Post


well if thats the case then . lol


they cant come up with any hard evidence towards a conspiracy nor can they come up with any hard evidence that Bin Laden had anything to do with it. Maybe It was Conspired by M.A.S.K. or possibly G.I. Joe then??


there isnt any evidence for anything. lol so that means there are more people out there who are gonna come up with crazy conspiracy theories.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 06:39 AM
Level 7 Blaze Master
aaronman's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,194
The weirdest part about 9/11 is WTC Building #7. The fact that it wasn't even included in the 9/11 report is the sketchiest part.

Larry Silverstein (owner) said in a PBS documentary that they eventually made the decision "to pull it" during the day, meaning destroy the building. So what if they did rig it with explosives and demolish it for safety purposes??

It would take well over the time they were given to plant the charges throughout the structure, meaning the explosives must have already been in place.

Not only that, but British media reported that WTC #7 collapsed 30 minutes before it actually did.

What was in building 7? A lot of dirt on high ranking officials (Giuliani). Not to mention, Silverstein profited over $250 million from insurance.

Then all the withholding of evidence on the plane that hit the pentagon is sketchy. They have so many cameras that would give a good angle of the plane, but they won't release any. They also don't mention that the pentagon has built in defense missiles. Why weren't they deployed?

And what ever happened to the news report of the white van with explosives on the GW bridge that had 2 Israelis in it?

I want to believe it wasn't our government, but why don't they just address these issues and settle it once and for all? If they are telling the truth they should have nothing to hide...
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 06:42 AM
Kbasa is offline  
Kbasa is on a distinguished road
Kbasa
Registered User
Kbasa's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronman View Post

I want to believe it wasn't our government, but why don't they just address these issues and settle it once and for all? If they are telling the truth they should have nothing to hide...
Yeah, I'm with you, but there is something up with this.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 07:00 AM
Buzzard is offline  
Buzzard has a brilliant futureBuzzard has a brilliant futureBuzzard has a brilliant futureBuzzard has a brilliant futureBuzzard has a brilliant futureBuzzard has a brilliant futureBuzzard has a brilliant futureBuzzard has a brilliant futureBuzzard has a brilliant futureBuzzard has a brilliant futureBuzzard has a brilliant future
Buzzard
Dream.....
Buzzard's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,230
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kbasa View Post
Notice how the top floors collapsed above the impact site with the least amount of weight above it? It shows that something was up, also what about the fire resistant coating on the beams? It also doesn't explain the the almost freefall of the building or the molten iron that were found in the debris. Also it falls straight down, and not to mention BBC reports WTC7 collapsing 20 minutes before it actually does. Also WTC7 collapses from the bottom down even though the fires were in the middle of the building?

these videos explain it better and are better than loose change.

http://www.911revisited.com/video.html

http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.tv/911.php

It wasn't freefall.


It's amazing how most truthers are too lazy to find out the truth.


We had a Zeitgeist thread once where i refuted (with evidence) the idiotic "demolition" theory.
__________________
SHIT PISS FUCK CUNT COCKSUCKER MOTHERFUCKER TITS

RIP
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 07:00 AM
Registered User
CosmicSerpent's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,547
This is kind of a vague question. I think it's pretty undeniable that in the very least, they tried to cover a few things up to make themselves not look so bad. So in that aspect, yes I believe the government is keeping secrets about 9/11. However, I don't think they are keeping secrets so significant that they would completely change the public's overall perception about what happened.

I don't believe that any part of the U.S. government was intentionally involved in the planning, organization, or execution of the attack. I don't believe there were any demolition explosives or bombs involved. I believe bin Laden and al-Qaeda were the sole parties responsible, and that the mainstream account is basically true. So far, I have not seen any evidence that would convince me otherwise.

What I do believe may have been covered up were warnings received by top government officials prior to the attack, but most importantly the response and lack of decision-making once it was actually unfolding that morning. They realized that their handling of the situation was horrible, and did everything possible to divert the public's attention from it. No doubt the media was involved too. But that's about as far as any "secrecy" goes.

None of the 9/11 conspiracy theories add up. If the government had really attempted something like this, the result would be a botched unsuccessful operation that exposed itself early on. I refuse to believe that Bush and his administration are capable of such a large scale organized secret attack. He hasn't done anything else with precision and accuracy during his administration, so what makes so many people think he would have the necessary qualities and resources to pull an inside job?
__________________
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 07:08 AM
Registered User
Tommot76's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 104
Haha I voted both since I dont believe the government purposely set the whole thing up, but I think there is a lot of reasoning and answers they arent going to explain to us
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 07:10 AM
Kbasa is offline  
Kbasa is on a distinguished road
Kbasa
Registered User
Kbasa's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzzard View Post
It wasn't freefall.


It's amazing how most truthers are too lazy to find out the truth.


We had a Zeitgeist thread once where i refuted (with evidence) the idiotic "demolition" theory.
I didnt say freefall, I said almost freefall.

Copy your argument from zeitgeist to here.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 07:14 AM
Level 7 Blaze Master
aaronman's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicSerpent View Post
He hasn't done anything else with precision and accuracy during his administration, so what makes so many people think he would have the necessary qualities and resources to pull an inside job?
He's fooled a lot of people into going to war for him at least once, he's advanced the neocon globalist agenda tremendously, and all his financial supporters have been made filthy rich in the process.

I don't believe all of the theories surrounding 9/11, like that they were actually missiles, or r/c controlled planes, the puffs of air shooting out of the windows are arguably caused by high pressures not explosives... But what do you think about the questions surrounding Building #7, and the fact that it was excluded from the official report all together?

Edit: damn, got moved to the crazy section too quick.

Last edited by aaronman; 07-02-2008 at 07:39 AM.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 09:28 AM
Tyro! is offline  
Tyro! is on a distinguished road
Tyro!
Registered User
Tyro!'s Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 100
Here's the sequel to Loose Change: Unfastened Coins.



But seriously, I got into all of this conspiracy theory stuff awhile back when Loose Change first came out. Unfortunately some of it is probably true, but due to the extraordinary cover up jobs, there's really not much that we can do about it. The few that may know the truth are always outweighed by the sheep who believe whatever "truth" the government feeds them.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 10:31 AM
Bong666 is offline  
Bong666 has received neither good or bad Karma
Bong666
MUSHROOMS
Bong666's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 8 7 0 6 2 1 3 4 5 7
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by labyrinth View Post
come dude thats Bull shit the us is not keeping secrets from us about 9/11 but iraq/iran is hole new story ... like this what im about ti say its not a lie... the pentagon told the media that it was called operation iraqi freedom or OIF but the troops said that it was called operation iraqi liberation or OIL !!!! wtf man blood for oil??? and one more story about Iran we had special forces operations in iran for 3 years now FACT i just seen this off of cnn looks like operation iran freedom is next or should i say operation irani liberation or OIL.. sad we go to war for oil . makes me feel down sometimes but i love my country i hope for peace
__________________
I need more
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 10:35 AM
Bong666 is offline  
Bong666 has received neither good or bad Karma
Bong666
MUSHROOMS
Bong666's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 8 7 0 6 2 1 3 4 5 7
Posts: 332
http://search.cnn.com/search?type=vi...t+oil&x=2&y=11 video inside
__________________
I need more
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 09:57 PM
Space Cowboy
pavlakos's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: milky way
Posts: 2,079
i didnt read any posts except for the first one and the few i skimmed while scrolling down, but heres my input:

9/11/1990 (solar maximum) George Bush Sr. announces NWO being in view.
exactly 11 years later, on the next solar maximum, the three towers, not two, but three towers fell.
keep in mind Hitlers false flag attack, aka Reichstag Fire, which let him pass the Enabling Act, essentially a 1940s version of the Patriot Act.
Now, Bush, upon knocking down the towers, has reason to go into Afghanistan, harvest mass quantities of opium(obvioulsy Bush didnt do it personally), sell them on the black market, go into Iraq, rob their oil, all while slowly surrounding Iran, which wishes to remain a sovereign nation, to instigate a war between the Muslims and Jews, and ultimately turning it into a WW3, killing off large quantities of people as planned.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/...owers_bush.htm
^interesting




EDIT: call me crazy, but i also believe that we are there for much more than oil. i believe we wanted access to iraq to take away the last of a technology which allows the user to look into the future, which saddam hussein had. i believe many countries had the technology and saddam had the last one and refused to destroy it, because the technology was overused and would ultimately cause the destruction of the planet.

EDIT2: dont forget the bill our beloved president bush passed pardoning him of all warcrimes, which basically gives him the right to do them again....
__________________
Peace, Love, Pot
Legalize it! www.abovetheignorance.org
I am not a number!!! I am a free man!!
Let go of reality, touch infinity.


Quote:
Originally Posted by africantapwater
"Dude.... I'm falling towards the Earth!!! DUDE!!! DUUUUUDE!!!"
STOOONED!!!!

Last edited by pavlakos; 07-02-2008 at 10:10 PM.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 11:28 PM
Bong666 is offline  
Bong666 has received neither good or bad Karma
Bong666
MUSHROOMS
Bong666's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 8 7 0 6 2 1 3 4 5 7
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by pavlakos View Post
i didnt read any posts except for the first one and the few i skimmed while scrolling down, but heres my input:

9/11/1990 (solar maximum) George Bush Sr. announces NWO being in view.
exactly 11 years later, on the next solar maximum, the three towers, not two, but three towers fell.
keep in mind Hitlers false flag attack, aka Reichstag Fire, which let him pass the Enabling Act, essentially a 1940s version of the Patriot Act.
Now, Bush, upon knocking down the towers, has reason to go into Afghanistan, harvest mass quantities of opium(obvioulsy Bush didnt do it personally), sell them on the black market, go into Iraq, rob their oil, all while slowly surrounding Iran, which wishes to remain a sovereign nation, to instigate a war between the Muslims and Jews, and ultimately turning it into a WW3, killing off large quantities of people as planned.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/...owers_bush.htm
^interesting






EDIT: call me crazy, but i also believe that we are there for much more than oil. i believe we wanted access to iraq to take away the last of a technology which allows the user to look into the future, which saddam hussein had. i believe many countries had the technology and saddam had the last one and refused to destroy it, because the technology was overused and would ultimately cause the destruction of the planet.

EDIT2: dont forget the bill our beloved president bush passed pardoning him of all warcrimes, which basically gives him the right to do them again....
what the what drugs are u on?!! i want some!!!!
__________________
I need more
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cannibus grow bible SmittyDaDude Advanced Growing Techniques 14 09-06-2008 08:12 PM
Government Report: Bio-Weapons Could Be Used To Combat Overpopulation weedzilla420 General 14 07-16-2008 05:59 PM
Doctors risking their livlihoods for you: the saga of Doc Fry. BubbleFunker Medical Marijuana 40 03-20-2008 06:54 PM
9/11 report slams ‘deep’ failings in government Bud Head General 0 07-23-2004 05:36 AM
Dutch Government to Put Cannabis on Prescription superjoint General Marijuana News from around the World 0 10-20-2001 07:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:10 PM.

© Copyright 1999-2008
Grasscity.Com
All rights reserved.


SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.