Senator, You Used to Be a Pot Head

[high as hell]

http://www.alternet.org/story/55830/

Editor's Note: The following is a letter addressed to Minnesota Republican Senator Norm Coleman -- a strong advocate of the brutal federal drug laws on the books -- reminding him that he used to be a happy, safe, fun-loving pot smoker.

My friend Norman,

Years ago, in a lifetime far away, you did not oppose the legalization of marijuana. Years ago, in our dorm rooms at Hofstra University, you, me, Billy, your future brother-in-law, Ivan, Jonathan, Peter, Janet, Nancy and a wealth of other students smoked dope.

Sure, we had to tape the doors shut, burn incense and open the windows, but we got high, and yet we grew up okay, without the help of the Office of National Drug Control Policy's advice.

We grew up to become lawyers. Our other friends, as you go down the list, are doctors, professors, parents, political consultants and professionals. No one ever got cancer from smoking pot or diabetes from using a joint. And the days of our youth we look back fondly upon as years where we stood up, were counted and made a difference, from Earth Day in 1970 to helping bring down a president and end a war in Southeast Asia a few years later. We smoked pot when we took over Weller Hall to protest administrative abuses of students' rights. You smoked pot as you stood on the roof of the University Senate protesting faculty exclusivity. As the President of the Student Senate in 1969, you condemned the raid by Nassau County police on our dormitories, busting scores of students for pot possession.

You never said then that pot was dangerous. What was scary then, and is as frightening now, is when national leaders become voices of hypocrisy, harbingers of the status quo, and protect their own position instead of the public good. Welcome to the crowd of those who have become a likeness of which they despised. Welcome to the mindless myriad of legislators who gather in cocktail lounges to manhandle their martinis while passing laws against drunk driving.

We have seen more people die last year from spinach then pot. We have endured generations of drug addicts overdosing on a multitude of drugs, from heroin to crystal methamphetamine. In your public life, as an attorney general, mayor and United States senator, you have been in the forefront of speaking out against abuses which are harmful. You have been a noble and honorable public servant. How about not being such a dope on dope?

How about admitting that if the Rockefeller drug laws were applied to Norman Bruce Coleman on Long Island in 1968, or to me, or to our friends, and fellow students, you, I and others we knew and loved might just be getting out of jail now? How about recognizing that for too long too many have been wrongly arrested, unjustly prosecuted and illegally incarcerated for unconscionable periods of time?

How about recognizing that you have peers who have smoked pot for 25 years or more and they are successful record producers, businessmen and parents?

How about standing up and saying you have heard and witnessed countless stories of persons who have used pot medicinally, as I have, to endure the effects of chemotherapy?

You who have travelled to Africa and seen the face of AIDS so up close and personal would deny medicinal marijuana relief to those souls wasting away from malnutrition, nausea and no access to fundamental medicines?

How about not adopting the sad and sorry archaic path of our office of drug control, which this week suggested pot smokers are more likely to become gang members than others?

How about standing up and saying: "I, Norm Coleman, smoked pot in 1969." That "I am not a gang member, a drug addict or a criminal."

How about saying: "I was able to responsibly integrate my prior pot use into my life, and still succeed on my own merits."

How about standing up not only for who you are, but who you were?

How about it, Norm?

I will always love, admire and cherish what you have achieved and accomplished and the goals you have met. I will always fondly look at the remarkable success of your present.

How about you looking back at your past and saying: "What I did was not so wrong and not so bad and not so hurtful that generations of Americans should still, decades later, be going to jail for smoking pot -- nearly one million arrests for possession last year."

Can't Norm Coleman come out of the closet in 2007 and say "These arrests are wrong -- that there is a better way, and we need to find it."

You might find more integrity and honor in that then adopting the sad and sorry policy of our Office of National Drug Control Policy.

You might find the person you were.

Norm Kent

Norm Kent is an attorney based in Ft. Lauderdale, FL, who specializes in criminal defense and appeals, media law and First Amendment issues. He serves on the Board of Directors for NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

[DirtyPete]

I don't know what to say. I wanted to stand up and yell towards the end of it, got me all emotional.


NORML is so awesome.

[emagdnim13]

[BlazinRaven]

stoner freedom! w00t!

[JollyRoger227]

Dude that letter tells it like it is. I wish more people did this kind of thing. Great post dude

[Predator1]

Fight the machine, man.

[Ypres]

Originally Posted by emagdnim13

Rock on.

[TotallyToked]

I wanna know what the guys respone to the letter is. I doubt he actually wrote a response, but I think one of the main problems is that public servants are never forced to defend their position really (I mean, they might throw out something like "Pot increases the likelyhood you join a gang" without any real research backing that up (I could just as well say that eating ice cream tends to make the weather warmer... I'd think it more likely that joining a gang exposes people to pot... if it were legal, I think any link between likelyhood to join a gang and smoking would disapear)

But anyway, they never actually have to sit down and debate this. They can ignore letters like the above, and they can ignore people who give them facts and reasonable scientific research. Their response can just be "No" and the media won't get on them about why. It really pisses me off

EDIT: If I could hear a good argument as to why Pot should not be legalized or fully decriminalized (ie: no penalties at all for under say 5 lbs or for growing, misdemeanor with no jail time for anything over that), I would likely not agree with that argument, but I could at least have some respect for someone sticking to it. What frustrates me is that there is no good argument that I have heard, and that nothing is going to force politicians in favor of keeping weed illegal to come forward and furnish an argument.

[^B-Dub21^]

awesome post!

[hendrix]

beautiful letter man

[Chaohinon]

Originally Posted by TotallyToked

But anyway, they never actually have to sit down and debate this. They can ignore letters like the above, and they can ignore people who give them facts and reasonable scientific research. Their response can just be "No" and the media won't get on them about why. It really pisses me off

Well this is the paradox of lawful authority that people fail to understand. All authority actually, by definition, exists in a state of lawlessness. They simply don't need to respond to anyone or anything, because they have the guns.