Top Bin Laden Expert: Confession Fake (email this to your congessional representative

[weedzilla420]

http://infowars.com/articles/terror/...ssion_fake.htm

Top Bin Laden Expert: Confession Fake
9/11 Blogger | February 19, 2007

Kevin Barrett sent the following email:

Top U.S. Bin Laden Expert: Confession Video “Bogus”
by Kevin Barrett, http://mujca.com
2/17/06

Was Osama Bin Laden responsible for 9/11?

The Bush Administration says yes, citing a grainy, badly-edited videotape that surfaced in December, 2001. In that tape, a fat guy who vaguely resembles Bin Laden chortles about the success of the 9/11 attacks. (In earlier interviews, Bin Laden had denied responsibility for 9/11, once even deploring the loss of civilian life in the attacks and calling them un-Islamic.)

Is the famous “confession video” genuine? Despite Bush’s insistence that the tape is authentic, America’s top academic Bin Laden expert has finally gone on the record, joining numerous other experts.

“It’s bogus,” says Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University’s Religious Studies program.

Lawrence, author of Messages to the World: The Statements of Osama Bin Laden, offered his historic debunking of the administration’s lie in an interview with Kevin Barrett (“Dynamic Duo,” gcnlive.com, 2/16/2007, first hour). The interview marked Lawrence’s first major public statement since he made headlines last year by suggesting that recent Osama tapes are hoaxes and that the real Osama Bin Laden may be dead.

Why has the Bush Administration been lying for more than five years by telling us that this preposterously bad hoax is a genuine “confession video”? Lawrence, citing informants in the US intelligence apparatus’s Bin Laden units, said that everyone knows the tape is fake, adding that the hoax has been kept alive because it is politically useful to those who wish to deflect attention from
“conspiracy theories” about 9/11.

If Professor Lawrence is right—and anyone with eyes can see that he is, simply by comparing the overweight impostor in the Fatty Bin Laden bogus confession video to other pictures of Osama Bin Laden—the Bush Administration, by repeatedly citing the tape as authentic, is clearly guilty of obstruction of justice at best, high treason and conspiracy to mass murder at worst. Since the FBI now tells us that Osama Bin Laden is “not wanted for 9/11” because there is “no hard evidence” connecting him to the 9/11 attacks, and since US intelligence personnel all know the “confession tape” is a Bush Administration hoax, it should not be difficult to nail the perpetrators of this outrageous cover-up of the crime of the century.

It is time for Congress or an appropriate judicial authority to mount an investigation of the Fatty Bin Laden bogus confession video.

Where did this tape come from? Who was responsible for the
administration’s claim that it is authentic, despite widespread knowledge in relevant intelligence agencies that it is bogus? If Bruce Lawrence is correct in asserting that US intelligence personnel know the tape is fake, we need to put them, along with Bush and Cheney, under oath and find out why our government has been lying so outrageously for more than five years in order to obstruct justice by shielding the real perpetrators of 9/11.

Please email your congressional representatives with the subject header “investigate bogus Bin Laden ‘confession video’ NOW!” and include a copy of this article in the body of the message.

[emagdnim13]

nothing will come of it.

nothing comes of anything in this world of an inactive congress.


they will say something like "if you want to prosecute the current administration, we will be emboldening the enemy and weakening our troops morale. also, you are a terrorist."

yay democracy!

it doesn't even work here and we are fighting wars to spread it elsewhere....

[Rasta_Man]

What a second... let me get this straight... so Bin Laden WASN'T behind 9-11?

Who was then? The flying spaghetti monster?

[emagdnim13]

but...but...but...that means the government...GASP ....lied.

[weedzilla420]

Originally Posted by Rasta_Man

What a second... let me get this straight... so Bin Laden WASN'T behind 9-11?

Who was then? The flying spaghetti monster?

i'm beginning to think my homeboy xenu had something to do with it.

[Tootsie ~ blue]

Originally Posted by Rasta_Man

What a second... let me get this straight... so Bin Laden WASN'T behind 9-11?

Who was then? The flying spaghetti monster?

that damn spaghetti monster needs to be put in a cage..

But heres something I wonder.. If Bush bullshits as much as this implies he does, why didnt he say they'd found Bin Laden way earlier?.. Infact they still havent officially found him, they just say he's dead..

[high as hell]

The real question is why hasn't Alex Jones been assassinated yet.

[Rasta_Man]

Originally Posted by Tootsie ~ blue

that damn spaghetti monster needs to be put in a cage..

But heres something I wonder.. If Bush bullshits as much as this implies he does, why didnt he say they'd found Bin Laden way earlier?.. Infact they still havent officially found him, they just say he's dead..

Because then there is no Goldstein.

[high as hell]

Originally Posted by Rasta_Man

Because then there is no Goldstein.

As I read.. "The interview marked Lawrence’s first major public statement since he made headlines last year by suggesting that recent Osama tapes are hoaxes and that the real Osama Bin Laden may be dead"

I thought the exact same thing.

[LieutenantDank]

I'm confused. bin Laden said that 9/11 was "un-Islamic" and that he would never have done such a thing even though he took responsibility for trying to take the same towers down just a few years before? I don't buy it.

[rumandromanism]

Originally Posted by high as hell

The real question is why hasn't Alex Jones been assassinated yet.

Hahaha that made my day. + rep

[high as hell]

Originally Posted by LieutenantDank

I'm confused. bin Laden said that 9/11 was "un-Islamic" and that he would never have done such a thing even though he took responsibility for trying to take the same towers down just a few years before? I don't buy it.

Read the first paragraph: The Bush Administration says yes, citing a grainy, badly-edited videotape that surfaced in December, 2001. In that tape, a fat guy who vaguely resembles Bin Laden chortles about the success of the 9/11 attacks. (In earlier interviews, Bin Laden had denied responsibility for 9/11, once even deploring the loss of civilian life in the attacks and calling them un-Islamic.)

They are saying that he never claimed he was the one that did it, and it was a fake video.

[Orangecoat]

Our govt needs to get their shit together. They covered up the landing on the moon pretty well. . . but the sucked at covering up 911

[LieutenantDank]

Originally Posted by high as hell

Read the first paragraph: The Bush Administration says yes, citing a grainy, badly-edited videotape that surfaced in December, 2001. In that tape, a fat guy who vaguely resembles Bin Laden chortles about the success of the 9/11 attacks. (In earlier interviews, Bin Laden had denied responsibility for 9/11, once even deploring the loss of civilian life in the attacks and calling them un-Islamic.)

They are saying that he never claimed he was the one that did it, and it was a fake video.

I wasn't talking about 9/11. The WTC was attacked by an al-Quida funded group in 1993, and bin Laden has repeatedly claimed that he helped organize the plot.

[hozomeen]

hmm...the blogger has no citations, no links to videos, no images, only words. bloggers need to work on the work that should go into their claims.

i can't find the confession video (does anyone else have a link?) but i found this:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html

it's pretty obvious that the guy isn't bin laden, but where is the evidence of bin laden saying the attacks were un-islamic? where is the video of anything?

if anyone is convinced of a hoax solely by this unsubstantiated letter, they are as guilty of believing in a hoax as are those who believe in the supposed hoax that is spoken of here.