Grasscity.com - the best counter-culture community


Go Back   Grasscity.com Forums > MARIJUANA GROWING > General Indoor Growing
Message Boards and Forums Directory


General Indoor Growing If you're growing indoors, this is the forum for you. Discuss lighting, mediums, feeding, efficiency and more.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #106 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 03:03 AM
tbolg is offline  
tbolg humbly walks among the Blades
tbolg
Cannabis Consumer
tbolg's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: So. Tex
Posts: 197
Re: The best stealth lighting system? ... PL FTW!

Quote:
Originally Posted by RooRTokeage View Post
I wanna get a GL80 grow tent. let me know what you think for lighting?? I have 2 pl 55 watt 27k bulbs. let me know what I would need for 4 plants. and the best. I was thinking a 150 hps but what u think?

Well the situations are all variable and not one setup can transfer to another perfectly every time . Your contrasting two different types of light . 110wtts total of Pl-l lights Vs. 150wtts HPS . The obvious winner in my book without having grown using the Pl-l Lights as of yet would be the HPS setup because you have 40 watts more of HPS .150w of HPS would be more intense of light than the 110w PL-L . EDIT: I just thought about it and i can re-call someone harping on 150w HPS because of the inefficiencies of the 150w sytems. Sooo someone please correct me if im totally off on this point .

Also your going to have to consider what ventilation system you will be capable of because the HPS light is going to run hotter . The Pl-l light on the other hand will remain relatively cool and wont need you to extract the hot air you would with the HPS.

Additionally your wanting to grow 4 plants under a 150wtt HPS ?? Or even yet 4 plants using a double 55Wtt system is both inefficient and simply not enough . I've heard that as a rough estimate when it comes to CFL ( which Pl-l are HO and more effiecient than cfls ) the best thing to do is use a minimum of 100Wtt for your first plant and 50-75wtts more each each plant after . So if you plug the numbers in (100w + 3(75w) = roughly 325wtts for healthy dank buds .

When it comes down to it just weigh your options and see which one you want to deal with . My choice personally is to go with the Pl-L Lights but thats just my prefrence .
__________________
CUTLASS INSPIRED STEALTH SPEAKER GROW BOX !!!!!
http://forum.grasscity.com/general-i...-lighting.html

Last edited by tbolg; 10-30-2009 at 03:07 AM.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #107 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 03:10 AM
tbolg is offline  
tbolg humbly walks among the Blades
tbolg
Cannabis Consumer
tbolg's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: So. Tex
Posts: 197
Re: The best stealth lighting system? ... PL FTW!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricard0 View Post


tblog


Could you perhaps provide a link to the info. stating the lumen-loss associated with the increased wattage? Or at least expand your explanation? I've read similar statements elsewhere, but with no facts to back it up, so i'm curious if you're basing your comments on someone's opinion or something more concrete. Thanx
I dont recall the forum that i found that information on because it was linked into some other forums so truthfully that is he said she said hearsay . Wish I had the link...
__________________
CUTLASS INSPIRED STEALTH SPEAKER GROW BOX !!!!!
http://forum.grasscity.com/general-i...-lighting.html
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #108 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 03:36 AM
Futur Master Chronic Guru
RooRTokeage's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cloud 12
Posts: 946
Re: The best stealth lighting system? ... PL FTW!

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbolg View Post
Well the situations are all variable and not one setup can transfer to another perfectly every time . Your contrasting two different types of light . 110wtts total of Pl-l lights Vs. 150wtts HPS . The obvious winner in my book without having grown using the Pl-l Lights as of yet would be the HPS setup because you have 40 watts more of HPS .150w of HPS would be more intense of light than the 110w PL-L . EDIT: I just thought about it and i can re-call someone harping on 150w HPS because of the inefficiencies of the 150w sytems. Sooo someone please correct me if im totally off on this point .

Also your going to have to consider what ventilation system you will be capable of because the HPS light is going to run hotter . The Pl-l light on the other hand will remain relatively cool and wont need you to extract the hot air you would with the HPS.

Additionally your wanting to grow 4 plants under a 150wtt HPS ?? Or even yet 4 plants using a double 55Wtt system is both inefficient and simply not enough . I've heard that as a rough estimate when it comes to CFL ( which Pl-l are HO and more effiecient than cfls ) the best thing to do is use a minimum of 100Wtt for your first plant and 50-75wtts more each each plant after . So if you plug the numbers in (100w + 3(75w) = roughly 325wtts for healthy dank buds .

When it comes down to it just weigh your options and see which one you want to deal with . My choice personally is to go with the Pl-L Lights but thats just my prefrence .

That gives me No help what so ever. I know alot about 2g11 bulbs and PL_L I am asking you what is a better to grow with 250 watts of PL-l or 250 watts of hps. which will yeild higher would you say???

You have my information incorrect thats why I think you got the wrong idea. haahha. I know its about prefrence but I never grew with either so I would not know what to chose. So thats why I am asking the forum. For the advice before I go out and spend the dough
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #109 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2009, 01:32 PM
-mu is offline  
-mu has been heard by many-mu has been heard by many-mu has been heard by many-mu has been heard by many-mu has been heard by many-mu has been heard by many-mu has been heard by many
-mu
me+cannabis=me
-mu's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Above ground, where the buds are.
Posts: 1,106
Re: The best stealth lighting system? ... PL FTW!

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbolg View Post
Mu- Its pretty crazy that after 2 years people actually are giving PL's a second look. I had seen last year this exact thread and because it looked a little over complex I didnt pay much attention. Ironic I think ...
I could of just posted "PL lamps are the best stealth lamps. Go get one!", but like many things in life, more effort = greater rewards. The length of the post serves as a filter, removing the undedicated!

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbolg View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricard0
Could you perhaps provide a link to the info. stating the lumen-loss associated with the increased wattage? Or at least expand your explanation? I've read similar statements elsewhere, but with no facts to back it up, so i'm curious if you're basing your comments on someone's opinion or something more concrete. Thanx
I dont recall the forum that i found that information on because it was linked into some other forums so truthfully that is he said she said hearsay . Wish I had the link...
...

Quote:
Originally Posted by RooRTokeage View Post
That gives me No help what so ever. I know alot about 2g11 bulbs and PL_L I am asking you what is a better to grow with 250 watts of PL-l or 250 watts of hps. which will yeild higher would you say???

You have my information incorrect thats why I think you got the wrong idea. haahha. I know its about prefrence but I never grew with either so I would not know what to chose. So thats why I am asking the forum. For the advice before I go out and spend the dough
With most lamps, as you increase Wattage, you also increase heat. With HID lighting, a lot of the energy used, is given off as heat, and as weird as this sounds, a lot of growers actually equate the intense heat of an HID as being a good thing, the more intense the better! Obviously this is erroneous.

The hotter the lamp, the farther away you need to position your plants. To get maximum efficiency from a 250W HID lamp, you would need to position it 5" from your plants. At that distance, your plants will burn. Growing indoors, heat is always the enemy.

A PL lamp, on the other hand, enables maximum efficiency almost right up to touching its surface! Ergo, you get to use more of the available Watts for your plants, as light.

But an HID lamp can throw usable light farther.

So, which is the most efficient when it comes to yield is a simple question: What is your growing style?

If you are scrogging, or SOGing, all the bud falls within around 1 foot (height), and because all the important (bud) parts of your smaller plants fall within this optimum light zone, the PL lamp will yield more bud.

If you grow tall plants, a good HID lamp of the same Wattage will yield more bud.

-mu
__________________
pH 1 = Low pH = Acid. pH 14 = High pH = Alkaline.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
efficiency, fluoresent lighting, lighting, pl lamps, shelf, shelf growing, stealth cab grow cabinet, stealth grow


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strain Forgiveness SourDiesel Absolute Beginners 12 06-13-2009 11:10 PM
Manifesto by Theodore K. Mackkonen Spirituality And Philosophy 5 05-28-2008 03:05 AM
my lighting system. Dankycountryboy General Indoor Growing 1 01-14-2006 02:26 AM
The Bomb Ass Lighting System Kro-Nesis Absolute Beginners 5 12-08-2002 04:50 PM
FYI Inrush Current NdicaBud Absolute Beginners 0 11-12-2001 09:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:08 PM.

© Copyright 1999-2009
Grasscity.Com
All rights reserved.


SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.