Login to Account Create an Account
Would it be possible?
#1
Posted 22 May 2012 - 02:32 PM
I ask because I always see a lot of people mentioning wanting to change their name because people could just google a common name they use and find them on here. Plus, I think it would stop a lot of people from asking for a name change.
- Thunder_Fuck likes this
#2
Posted 25 May 2012 - 06:37 PM
There are very few forums that I visit where you can see what you see here without being members.
- JeffA93 likes this
#3
Posted 27 May 2012 - 07:35 PM
#4
Posted 28 May 2012 - 12:34 AM
#5
Posted 28 May 2012 - 12:41 AM
Sounds like a good idea, maybe you could even have an option to make your posts/threads invisible to non members ??
That's called Nirvana Skunky
#6
Posted 06 June 2012 - 06:05 AM
Would it be possible to have an option that would censor our usernames from nonmembers? Like if somebody doesn't have a GC account or they're not signed in, all the would see is ******* for the username.
I ask because I always see a lot of people mentioning wanting to change their name because people could just google a common name they use and find them on here. Plus, I think it would stop a lot of people from asking for a name change.
My name is ******and I fully support this idea. Specially cause I have someone trying to bust me by following me on here currently.
#7
Posted 06 June 2012 - 07:23 PM
I'm a firm believer in privacy...personally, in your own home and even on the crazy internet. Although, I will say that we are all responsible for what we post...it still would be nice to just have members able to view what we post. Plus, the total number of members would increase significantly. That should be an interesting fact for SJ if he were so inclined to allow us to go this route.
#8
Posted 06 June 2012 - 10:01 PM
#9
Posted 06 June 2012 - 10:04 PM
#10
Posted 07 June 2012 - 02:37 AM
I think that having a small fee, even just $5, would also deter most troll threads.
Thats what Nirvana is for. Its alot more low key in there.
#11
Posted 07 June 2012 - 07:42 AM
I have to say I'm still for this idea (but more so just that you can't view certain areas unless you're a member, the **** wouldn't even have to come into play, especially if it isn't an option) even if just for the grow forums.
I'm a firm believer in privacy...personally, in your own home and even on the crazy internet. Although, I will say that we are all responsible for what we post...it still would be nice to just have members able to view what we post. Plus, the total number of members would increase significantly. That should be an interesting fact for SJ if he were so inclined to allow us to go this route.Wink wink, SJ!
I'm all for it, too. Not so much censoring user names because that seems like a programming pain in the ass, but there are plenty of forums that don't allow you to view content without a user account. I wouldn't mind that sort of thing being implemented here.
Sure it might mean that a few people decide not to bother because they can't read without registering, but I think far more people would decide to make an account to get access to the info we have here.
I think that having a small fee, even just $5, would also deter most troll threads.
That seems like a bad idea, from a business aspect. I would never choose to be a member on a forum that requires a $5 membership fee right from the start. I'm not willing to pay money just to simply register an account on a forum, and it's something that would make me say "nope" right from the get-go.
JohnnyWeedSeed is right, that's why we have the Nirvana forum. People that have grown to love these forums can pay for a subscription to get access to a private forum with fellow paid members. I think that's a great way to go about it.
I would have never registered here if I was required to pay $5 just to be a member, without even knowing whether I'd like it or not.
#12
Posted 07 June 2012 - 01:44 PM
Edited by jmick, 07 June 2012 - 02:23 PM.
add info
#13
Posted 07 June 2012 - 03:26 PM
Well, it could be a free membership for a month, no posting- reading only, and then if you like the site a one time $5 membership fee...I think it would improve the quality of the site....Just had another thought...automatic membership with a purchase from the GC store...Eh?
That sounds good also but I get the feeling that requiring ppl to pay won't happen. It will discourage the ppl that Join just to spam, or to troll. I like the ideas you have though.
#14
Posted 07 June 2012 - 03:35 PM
#15
Posted 07 June 2012 - 04:19 PM
I think we should look into something like that.
#16
Posted 09 July 2012 - 01:21 AM
#17
Posted 09 July 2012 - 04:16 AM
i've already thrown most of my thoughts on this issue out there....anybody else?
Edited by jmick, 09 July 2012 - 04:19 AM.
add info...
#18
Posted 09 July 2012 - 10:04 AM
#19
Posted 09 July 2012 - 08:10 PM
I could see something like requiring a Rep or time spent as member requirement to access that section, that would probably drastically increase security.. but that has the drawback that I'm sure there are members who join specifically to post in that section and all
#20
Posted 09 July 2012 - 08:36 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Back to top








Sign In
Create Account