Welcome to Grasscity ForumsRegister now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account
Posted 25 February 2012 - 10:26 PM
I'm confused about it as some seem to think it's like dog shit and others think it's not that bad. Guess doing this thread won't solve my confusion
I suppose it fully depends on the level of smoker you're dealing with. We started with schwag back in the day only a couple times, mids were sooo much better and not that much pricier. Now it's only chronic, fuck mids, I want to get high, I don't want to get a headache, and a couple tokes will get you way further.
Objectively, the grading is chronic > mids > schwag. Why would you go for the lowest grade? It's not like gasoline, it's like meat. Choose the steak restaurant over taco bell's beef every time
Posted 26 February 2012 - 12:21 AM
Dank is going to win in conparison everytime but bottom line is.. Weed is weed, and when you cant get one and the other is available they both will get you high( enough?) But I mean like atm I cant really afford dank and be able to smoke all week, so I can smoke on some swag till i can.. Yeah im supporting the cartels and probably smoking somethin fierce but It is still Mary jane, same plant, one was just grown outdoors and left nature to nurish it, and well if that wasnt how its meant to be then idk what.
Posted 26 February 2012 - 03:31 AM
...Too many weed snobs, swear.
There's nothing snobby about not smoking weed that wasn't grown correctly at all. I've seen schwag with string and bugs in it. I smoked it when I was in high school but now that I know better... I'll never touch another brick of schwag for as long as I live.
Posted 26 February 2012 - 03:44 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users