Truthfully I dont know anything about the fish you mention. I'll try to look up some info on it. As for the Archaeopteryx, is not considered a 'missing link' and is not shown to prove evolution anymore. I think most people have agreed that its 100% bird but I have read some stuff about people studying it to find the origin of birds.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DaZEED&ConFuseD
Mammals arent the only example, of course. Just look at at a timeline of the different animals. So far the hasn't been any mammals before reptiles, no reptiles before amphibians, no amphibians before fish, no multicellular organisms before unicellular organisms. You see a hierarchy going on? This is based on current records and observations.
|
This time line is how evolution assumes the animals time on earth would have been. It also fits well with the geologic findings in the layers of the earth. (Further down, the older) But this could also have been explained by a flood. So who is to say that these creatures all existed at different time periods? There is definately no overwhelming evidence of it. Just a theory still.