[Gri77oN]

i tend to turn to the future, Gilligan, as you know.

the furtur is:

-we will help freedom spread where needed.
-we will use force if necessary


(as for the WWI WWII argumentation, google slashdot, it's all been said there, be ready for some long reading.)

-------------

to wards the future now?

what will stop bush.

we have seen it is not the UN, we know it's not even it's citizens since they are manipulated (*), and we sure know that even if quite the whole of HUMANITY says no he will still go .

so i ask, how do we stop bush from pusshing ih religions' views on freedom to others? (that is fanatism, last time it happend it was called crusades, and was one of the bloddiest time of our history (propartionaly to the means of destruction available)


MY QUESTION:

HOW DOES ONE STOP BUSH FROM BOMBARDING A COUNTRY (is it by submitting? if so where is the difference between bush and saddam?)




*:no gilligan, i wont argue over that one again, rent the movie "independant media in a time of war", the demosntration is quite understandable, even for americans, no pund intended)
i wont argue, and if if you think i'm wrong, i have nothing agaisnt that.
i'm not scared about being wrong about the past. it's the futur that iwanna care about.