Quote:
Originally Posted by snapperkeeper  Even if the topic of this thread was entitled "splitting hairs over when a raid is not a raid" and even if Obama's DEA was not fundamentally incapable of saying, "no thanks, it's a states' rights issue" and even if any of this mattered a good god damn to those operators now facing federal drug trafficking charges, the point remains intact that the DEA, under Obama/Holder, still poses a threat to dispensary operators. There will be those who insist on proceding to open their dispensaries and they will be running a real risk of being busted if or when the political winds blow in the wrong direction. |
Well I for one am glad that the DEA still poses a "threat" to ILLEGAL dispensaries that shouldn't be operating in the first place. And by the way on a side note, federal agencies usually conduct operations AT THE SPECIFIC REQUEST OF THE PROPER STATE AGENCIES, regardless if its a state issue or not - you think local police have the ability to trace explosives? No, they call the ATF, even if it is not a federal issue. Im not splitting hairs - the difference is night and day, there is a VERY VERY BIG difference between a legal and an illegal dispensary. These people who got raided DESERVED to get raided because they were BREAKING THE LAW (both state and federal). The DEA does NOT pose anykind of threat what so ever to LEGAL dispensaries.