[DaleGribble]

To clarify more. The scientific evidence of THC and its direct and indirect affects on growths, enzyme production or non-production, virus replication, etc, etc. Is in a clearly infant stage. This stage is being taken slowly by the same pharmaceutical companies we're trying to stay away from. If potential medical uses are found from this research, for the serious ailments from your studies, they will be owned by pfizer and come in a pill form. You can be sure if weed cures cancer, it wont have anything to do with rolling papers.

Seperate that from todays modern medical marijuana situation, where the dirtiest way of testing efficacy (as far as science/medicine are concerned: ie, smoking, using the entire product with a caucophony of ruining variables) is apparantly being seen as a success. That many of these symptoms, be it fatigue, weight loss, appetite, depression, pain, etc, etc while all caused by different things, have one thing in common. Smoking weed, not injecting THC, helps there symptoms. With no special attention to how each of these ailments DIFFER, the same properties of cannabis result a loss or lessening of symptoms. Seems to me the Symptom driven success is based on the fact that you dont feel symptoms when you are high, or feel them less.

Does anything I say break any logically bounds here?