Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 4Degrees
Oh, and the Beatles are a load of shit. They are the epitome of popcultured music. Their lyrics and music were not impressive or talent-worthy. I give them no credit. The Rolling Stones started out before or around the same time as the Beatles, and they are a hell of a lot more talented in every element than the Beatles could ever wish to be. Take a look at the Rolling Stones' career and the evolution they put into their music. I mean, compare albums like Emotional Rescue, Sticky Fingers, Beggars Banquet, and Tattoo You. Not very many bands can evolve like that.
|
wow, what beatles albums have you listened too? they were all friends with the rolling stones (mick jager was at the live "all you need is love" brodcast, he smoked a joint sitting next to them and got a fine for it after the cops watching tv realised what it was). you may not like them but they were damn influential and they did evolve a lot. listen to their works starting at rubber soul. thats when they stopped being pop music and started being themselves. they weren't the first rock band, but they were one of the biggest. compare rubber sould to revolver, albums that were released in under a year of each other. their style evolves so much in there. dislike them all you want, but don't say the didn't do shit and didn't evolve.