Quote:
Originally Posted by OshGoshKaBosh  Oh and another bullshit fact: GH: under a LB, and around 6% THC compared to AN: over 2 LB and over 20% THC...come on, genetics are supposed to be the same, we all know nutes dont make that huge a difference. If GH is so bad, why is it used successfully by so many growers?
Anyways, I don't want to take anything away from AN but I am disappointed they decided to make this public when it is obviously doctored. |
I agree, I use AN products with no problem. However these claims of over double the yield of GH, and like almost 4 times the THC
I don't mind spending abit extra for nutes if they make up for it with yield, but comeon.
I am going to check things out for myself. I am starting a grow with 8 waterfarms.
I am going to sacrific 3 of them to test it out.
Bucket 1.......GH base nutrients only
Bucket 2.......AN base nutrients only (conneisure)
Bucket 3.......GH base nutrients along with a selection of AN additives.
Buckets 4-8.....AN base nutrients along with a selection of AN additives.
All will have the same clones, same pH, same light, same air, same water, same temp. I even plan to rotate the plants daily, so they each get equal lighting over their flowering life. I will make a journal too