[IGotTheCottons]

just because some rocks with iron in them got turned upside down doesn't mean that there was a pole switch. and also, which way does the iron go? there's poles on both ends so wouldn't that spread the iron out throughout the rock? oh, and how can you tell which iron was charged positivly and which was charged negativly as the rocks were cooling? and couldn't it be a possibility that the charge of the iron in the rocks could have changed over time (which is possible).

and finally, how can you determine just how old the rocks are when it's proven fact that uranium-lead, potassium-argon, and carbon14-carbon12 dating are all vastly inaccurate? especially seeing as how they've dated living snails to be 27,000 years old. the reliability of these dating techniques is based on assumptions, one of which being that the decay rate of these elements is constant in the environment, which is proven that they are not (if you want I'll give the backing for this). so you see, the last pole switch could have been a thousand years ago for all you know.

EDIT: and also... what are your responses to my other points? does anyone here have enough proof for their religion (i'm talking about evolution by the way) to defend it?

there's a guy with a standing offer. if anyone can give him any legitimate scientific proof for macro evolution, he will give them $10,000 on the spot. he was a former science teacher, and has debated the top evolutionists on this planet. so far no one has been able to give him any real proof. all the "scientific evidence" for evolution is a bunch of crap, and has no backing. all it is is a bunch of circular reasoning (ie, fossils are dated by the rock layers they're in, and the rock layers are dated by the fossils they contain).