View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2004, 08:55 PM
ReformMaryJaneLaws is offline  
ReformMaryJaneLaws has a reputation above and beyondReformMaryJaneLaws has a reputation above and beyondReformMaryJaneLaws has a reputation above and beyondReformMaryJaneLaws has a reputation above and beyondReformMaryJaneLaws has a reputation above and beyondReformMaryJaneLaws has a reputation above and beyondReformMaryJaneLaws has a reputation above and beyondReformMaryJaneLaws has a reputation above and beyondReformMaryJaneLaws has a reputation above and beyondReformMaryJaneLaws has a reputation above and beyondReformMaryJaneLaws has a reputation above and beyond
ReformMaryJaneLaws
RMJL-Forum Administrator
ReformMaryJaneLaws's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 17,560
It violates it pretty badly. The only leg they really have to stand on when it comes to justifying their decision is that public transport is federally funded. With them getting their money to function from the government, the government may believe that it has this right to take away the freedom of private advertising when it comes to advertising on something they pay for...but...BIG BUT....the money essentially comes from our taxes, so they still aren't in the right at all. So, while they aren't allowing private sectors to purchase ad space on public transportation to promote reform, they are still spending our tax dollars for their anti-marijauna bullshit.
  Reply With Quote