Quote:
Originally Posted by remdog
the point where i see this is flawed is within in the question, are humans any less natural than any thing else? i say no.
and to this i also add is a human killing someone else anything more than its own survival? a criminal for example carries a gun, robs a bank to get money to get by, cops oppose him, and he shoots the cops in fear of giving up his flourisihng life. is this any different than say a crocadile killing a wilderbeast to feed its self and family?isnt that whay the criminal robbed the bank, to feed his family and him self?
dont we also raise humans to be vicious, i mean a crimainal maser mind is trained by one influence or another, and a football player the same? dont we train humans in that smae way?
just some ideas
|
i pretty much agree with what you're saying. we do what we gotta do to survive. the only difference is, our brains are able to process our actions on many, many different and complicated levels. more than any other animal brain, i'd assume. we're able to assign "good" and "bad" to all the various means of survival, but they're still just means.