Quote:
Originally Posted by My Fax
I don't think so.
I say that because nature has a very fine balance. Animals killing for sport would upset that balance, and in turn, possibly hurt their chances of survival.
Whether an animal has the ability to be good/evil? In the wild, no. Pets on the otherhand, I might think differently.
People will raise dogs to be vicious, and to pretty much attack anything that moves. They also raise dogs to love unconditionally.
Granted it's because of how their owners raised then. But whether or not the animal is good/evil is debatable.
Personally, I don't think animals are capable of it.
|
the point where i see this is flawed is within in the question, are humans any less natural than any thing else? i say no.
and to this i also add is a human killing someone else anything more than its own survival? a criminal for example carries a gun, robs a bank to get money to get by, cops oppose him, and he shoots the cops in fear of giving up his flourisihng life. is this any different than say a crocadile killing a wilderbeast to feed its self and family?isnt that whay the criminal robbed the bank, to feed his family and him self?
dont we also raise humans to be vicious, i mean a crimainal maser mind is trained by one influence or another, and a football player the same? dont we train humans in that smae way?
just some ideas