Thread: A Proposition
View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 04:20 AM
bkadoctaj is offline  
bkadoctaj has a reputation beyond reputebkadoctaj has a reputation beyond reputebkadoctaj has a reputation beyond reputebkadoctaj has a reputation beyond reputebkadoctaj has a reputation beyond reputebkadoctaj has a reputation beyond reputebkadoctaj has a reputation beyond reputebkadoctaj has a reputation beyond reputebkadoctaj has a reputation beyond reputebkadoctaj has a reputation beyond reputebkadoctaj has a reputation beyond repute
bkadoctaj
Mr. Woodfine
bkadoctaj's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 4,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam_Spade View Post
Greetings again bkadoctaj,

Ah, so we come down to semantics? The proposition was intentionally constructed to be flexible. Reasonable would suggest a high level of certainty. I hope that we would both be aware that no claim can ever be 100%, that is the nature of human knowledge. We can only approach increasing percentages of certainty based upon logical consistency and available evidence.

Yours Truly,
Sam_Spade
You talk about percentages as if they are inherent in nature. As if they could exist outside of human beings. And certainty (or more scientifically, accuracy) is not precision. Precision is possibly what empirical and experimental research can demonstrate or allude to. Not accuracy, because we all understand that that is an absolute, and yet do humans truly understand what an absolute is, other than as a figment of their imagination.
__________________

  Reply With Quote