Grasscity.com Forums - View Single Post - Will Bush be the NAU 'president' in 2012?

tea.mochi · #79 (**permalink**) 05-07-2008, 06:43 AM

Ron Paul likes that Obama will get out of the war, but not his foreign policy.
Ron Paul's foreign policy is one of non intervention, so all US troops are here at home where they belong, Obama still wants to occupy places, so Ron Paul still disagrees with that point.
To suggest that Ron Paul would say one thing and mean another after over 20 years of saying the same shit over and over and over is kinda silly.

I watched your video and he says Obama is SLIGHTLY better on the foreign policy. I don't see how that is LIKING it. Looks like you're putting a spin on words.

Also, Ron Paul is IN the race. I have my ballot right in front of me and his name is on it. And who not get excited? A presidential candidate who wants to return to the constitution, give us freedom, sound money, no war and get us to take care of ourselves and this is a BAD thing? Its honestly astonishing...

Thanks for letting me know the page I posted was incorrect, that was a mistake on my part and I apologize.
I can't find anything on foreign policy cause I can't find the link, but I remember hearing that ours is supposed to be of non-intervention (and no, I didn't hear it from Ron Paul, but rather my school) and anyone who suggests we should expect other countries to actually allow us to watchdog them is off their rocker IMHO.

But like I said, if I have to swallow an Obama presidency I think I could, but I honestly don't have a good feeling about him. And no, color is not an issue, its the idea that we need to become a welfare state and watchdog other countries and expect them to love us for it and increase spending the most out of all of the candidates... and this is a GOOD thing.

#79 (permalink) 05-07-2008, 06:43 AM
tea.mochi GIRL Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Oregon Posts: 1,867 Blog Entries: 8	Ron Paul likes that Obama will get out of the war, but not his foreign policy. Ron Paul's foreign policy is one of non intervention, so all US troops are here at home where they belong, Obama still wants to occupy places, so Ron Paul still disagrees with that point. To suggest that Ron Paul would say one thing and mean another after over 20 years of saying the same shit over and over and over is kinda silly. I watched your video and he says Obama is SLIGHTLY better on the foreign policy. I don't see how that is LIKING it. Looks like you're putting a spin on words. Also, Ron Paul is IN the race. I have my ballot right in front of me and his name is on it. And who not get excited? A presidential candidate who wants to return to the constitution, give us freedom, sound money, no war and get us to take care of ourselves and this is a BAD thing? Its honestly astonishing... Thanks for letting me know the page I posted was incorrect, that was a mistake on my part and I apologize. I can't find anything on foreign policy cause I can't find the link, but I remember hearing that ours is supposed to be of non-intervention (and no, I didn't hear it from Ron Paul, but rather my school) and anyone who suggests we should expect other countries to actually allow us to watchdog them is off their rocker IMHO. But like I said, if I have to swallow an Obama presidency I think I could, but I honestly don't have a good feeling about him. And no, color is not an issue, its the idea that we need to become a welfare state and watchdog other countries and expect them to love us for it and increase spending the most out of all of the candidates... and this is a GOOD thing.