Quote:
Originally Posted by TiCkEr  Sure!
Truth: a verified or indisputable fact, proposition, principle, or the like.
You clearly missed my point. When I said it was a not conspiracy, I meant it in a sense that it should not be looked upon as a "conspiracy theory" by "conspiracy theorists" with all the dogma that goes along with anything "conspiracy". It is the truth and thus should be addressed as the truth, nothing but. I did not mean it in a grammatically correct sense with definitions and such, who gives a fck really. I'm not disputing what the definition of "conspiracy" is.. all I'm saying is that 9/11 should not be labeled as such.There are tons of bogus conspiracy theories out there, which keep people from opening up to what really happened on 9/11. People think if they believe 9/11 is an inside job, then they also must believe Hilary Killary is a shapeshifting alien from another planet.
TiCkEr |
Why should it not be looked upon as a "conspiracy theory" by "conspiracy theorists"? Do I need to post the definition of "conspiracy theory" one more time? Seriously, go read it again.
No matter what you say, the idea of the government being involved in 9/11 is by definition a conspiracy. The fact that it is a conspiracy has absolutely NOTHING to do with whether it is true or not, and I never implied that it did. The assassination of Julius Caeser was a conspiracy, and it was true. The Watergate scandal was a conspiracy, and it was also true.
I did not miss your point. You misinterpreted mine because you didn't fully understand the meaning of a word. You implied that the word "conspiracy" meant that something wasn't true, so you were in fact disputing its definition. And it has nothing to do with grammar, it has to do with lexicon.