Quote:
Originally Posted by MoreBudzForMe
Nothing more to be said really. At least not in my mind. Small as it may be.
Ah but quality now thats an interesting topic, who/what is it that quantifies quality and were does quality exist? Is a red apple red, the way we percieve red, in the objective world?(the question we ask as children, do you see the same red?) Well one could argue the objective world is less concrete then previously thought. More of a fuzz than a concrete statue that we have nothing to do with. What makes up the fuzz, energy? Well what is energy?Movement? Movement in what, it seems to me there isn't anywhere to move to if this all ='s zero. Its all illusion in my mind. But why actually go through with all the bullshit (Cancer SUCKS), whats the point? As terence mckenna said "Oh, I don't know, a good party."
If this don't make sense I totally understand, I'm not as learned as Id like to be, but I try.
|
Um.... I actually have a question for you: how could something be "red" if no one could see it? Objectivity doesn't apply to adjectives. That's why you have to watch when pro-Rationalists and pro-Religionists stress subjective qualities (a.k.a. use adjectives). Certainly they aren't talking about any sort of Objective Truth, but rather a subjective approximation of it, perhaps (albeit with the assumption that Objective Truth does indeed exists*).
* And what I mean by that is, what is Objective? Isn't Objectivity perceived? If so... it's subjective again.
EDIT: I'll response more in depth to your post shortly as well.
By the way, what is that thing in your signature, "Family is everything!" about? I'm curious to know what you mean.