Thread: CDs vs. LPs
View Single Post
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 07:26 PM
eleven357 is offline  
eleven357 has a reputation above and beyondeleven357 has a reputation above and beyondeleven357 has a reputation above and beyondeleven357 has a reputation above and beyondeleven357 has a reputation above and beyondeleven357 has a reputation above and beyondeleven357 has a reputation above and beyondeleven357 has a reputation above and beyondeleven357 has a reputation above and beyondeleven357 has a reputation above and beyondeleven357 has a reputation above and beyond
eleven357
Grow the Doja!
eleven357's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: California
Posts: 6,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by ETEK View Post
if you spend a shit load of money on an extremely high end record player that uses lasers the sound quality wouldnt be anywhere near that of a typical cd. and keep in mind LPs are created first then the music is compressed to fit on the CD. and anthing compressed isnt as good as the origional. sorry to burst your bubble eleven357 but a CD is better than your iPod
Oh no he wants to debate compression rates of mp3s?

Seriously, can one of you LP heads tell me what the signal to noise ratio is on a Technics SL-1210? Sorry I need more signal than noise in my music.

LP's are good for one thing, mixing, scratching, etc.

I can understand this if you are a DJ who still spins vinyl, but if you aren't then I don't see the point.

(queue flaming comments)

The quality of the MP3 is determined by the bitrate in which it was encoded. Most of my MP3s are ripped@320kbps, which is a much greater quality than 128kbps.
__________________



Last edited by eleven357; 04-18-2008 at 07:34 PM.
  Reply With Quote