View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2008, 08:32 PM
the roach is offline  
the roach has a brilliant futurethe roach has a brilliant futurethe roach has a brilliant futurethe roach has a brilliant futurethe roach has a brilliant futurethe roach has a brilliant futurethe roach has a brilliant futurethe roach has a brilliant futurethe roach has a brilliant futurethe roach has a brilliant futurethe roach has a brilliant future
the roach
is dead
the roach's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: bumtown
Posts: 1,680
That's a neat article however,
Quote:
Originally Posted by cspcdawg View Post
[Note: the last mass extinction caused by a meteor collision was that of the dinosaurs, 65 million years ago.]
Most widely-supported explanations (Dinosaur mass extinctions)
Macleod (2001)<sup id="wp-_ref-11" class="reference">[14]</sup> summarised the relationship between mass extinctions and events which are most often cited as causes of mass extinctions, using data from Courtillot et al (1996),<sup id="wp-_ref-12" class="reference">[15]</sup> Hallam (1992)<sup id="wp-_ref-13" class="reference">[16]</sup> and Grieve et al (1996)<sup id="wp-_ref-14" class="reference">[17]</sup>:
  • Flood basalt events: 11 occurrences, all associated with significant extinctions<sup id="wp-_ref-i_0" class="reference">[18]</sup><sup id="wp-_ref-ii_0" class="reference">[19]</sup> But Wignall (2001) concluded that only 5 of the major extinctions coincided with flood Basalt eruptions and that the main phase of extinctions started before the eruptions.<sup id="wp-_ref-15" class="reference">[20]</sup>
  • Sea-level falls: 12, of which 7 were associated with significant extinctions.<sup id="wp-_ref-ii_1" class="reference">[19]</sup>
  • Asteroid impacts producing craters over 100km wide: 1, associated with 1 mass extinction.
  • Asteroid impacts producing craters less than 100km wide: over 50, the great majority not associated with significant extinctions.

http://www.answers.com/topic/extinct...cat=technology

We can't say for sure what happened, but to claim with such certainty that they were wiped out by only one of the theories theory is a bit unprofessional. (and dare I say....unscientific!)

Other then that It's a neat article.
__________________

Last edited by the roach; 03-28-2008 at 08:34 PM.
  Reply With Quote