|
Yeah, 9/11 was a good way to get public opinion supporting "pre-emptive" policies. If someone accepts that, the rest is simple to put together.
Another good example of social mechanics is the camera thing in England. Check this out and then think twice about who gains what when something like that happens.
Anyway, fuck that, most people are so ignorant that they can't see their own ears. :-)
About the plant, the things you say are neither correct nor wrong. Basically you say one thing, that the plant is good for us [almost every one here agrees with that], but the way you present it is just too much [my guess is that almost no one here agrees with that, why ? -Is it really ignorance ? Lack of research? Lack of enlightenment?].
Let me explain why I say this.
You talk about the nutritional value of the seeds. Well, could you perhaps tell me which essential amino and fatty acids (as you say), the plant has ? Please do so by giving some solid reference. Also, present it like you are talking to a guy with the knowledge of a 3rd year old. This could be helpful [no dammit, it won't save the world, but still] for those watching this discussion, because, after we all agree that it does NOT have ALL the essential amino acids and fatty acids human creatures need, we will at least know how those amino/fatty acids are called and maybe perhaps why it's not cannabis plants we would seek to get them even if their cultivation was legal and contained all of them, anyway.
For me that would be convincing enough. I mean, it would convince me that you are fighting for something, rather than just propagate ideas (just that) that seem to suit your way of living, demanding them to be accepted by the public in general. Well, if you are about to do this, you better be convincing. If you are not, then what and how exactly are you fighting for?
And to avoid any misunderstandings, I am just playing devil's advocate, giving a little twisted perspective. All is well, peace.
|