Quote:
Originally Posted by elproducto
is that really true? i tried looking this up online but can't find anything.
|
Well technically now yes it is.
"The smell alone can't constitute the grounds because the smell of burnt marijuana - as opposed to raw marijuana - gives an inference that the material is gone, it's dissipated into the atmosphere. So how can you say you're in possession of something that doesn't exist?" Piche said. "There may be suspicion that the person is in possession of marijuana but that's not enough to base an arrest."
Case in Saskatchewan
http://cannabisculture.com/articles/5161.html