View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 06:21 PM
BubbleFunker is offline  
BubbleFunker has a reputation beyond reputeBubbleFunker has a reputation beyond reputeBubbleFunker has a reputation beyond reputeBubbleFunker has a reputation beyond reputeBubbleFunker has a reputation beyond reputeBubbleFunker has a reputation beyond reputeBubbleFunker has a reputation beyond reputeBubbleFunker has a reputation beyond reputeBubbleFunker has a reputation beyond reputeBubbleFunker has a reputation beyond reputeBubbleFunker has a reputation beyond repute
BubbleFunker
Female Canna-Maniac
BubbleFunker's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Top O' the Bottom Cali-billy!
Posts: 1,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by weedseed View Post
As if you just made a point...



The universe is space. You're assuming there is space outside the universe. Are you suggesting a multiverse?




Irrational? not according to the reasonable majority (who's only objective is fact, wherever it may lead).




If you haven't seen them either then why are you suggesting a scenario at all?





So you were there?




I do realize this, but that is not what was said.




I'm stating what science has discovered. Besides, the Big Bang is highly more likely than your "non-bang"--





I didn't say General Relativity did. I said GR supports Big Bang and Big Bang supports the Cosmological Argument.

Humor me. What is the correct sequence?




Honestly, most believers don't concern themselves with any of this.




Good point. Even some of your agnostic scientists will say the reason is that we cannot hope to discover truth of any metaphysical causes. Read 5c.






I'm glad that you mentioned these. My next stop is explaining the error in these exact theories.
I did make a point: that you have no point in all your rambling.
__________________


  Reply With Quote